科学知识经济学还是新科学经济学——结合文本、案例的比较分析被引量：3

Economics of Scientific Knowledge or New Economics of Science?——Comparative Analysis Based on Text and Case

导出

摘要目前学界在科学知识经济学概念上达成共识,但在其规范性和与新科学经济学的关系上还有分歧。汉兹对规范性的坚持缩小了科学知识经济学的研究范畴,其文本分析对象的不一致造成新科学经济学的概念模糊。新科学经济学和科学知识经济学都关注优先权规则,前者利用囚徒困境、资源配置研究科学家行为,后者利用期望效用模型分析理论选择问题。它们在科学动机、研究方法、解释方式上存在共同之处。 Nowadays, the concept of economics of scientific knowledge has been reached a consensus. But its normativity and relationship with new economics of science are uncertain. Hands insisted normativity , which narrowed the scope of ESK. The concept of NES was vague because of ineonformity of the text analysis. Concerning the rule of priority, NES studies the behavior of scientists with prisoner＇s dilemma and resource allocation, while ESK analyzes the problem of theory choice with expected utility model. It is in common among their scientific motivation, research methods and interpretive mode.

作者王一雪

机构地区厦门大学哲学系

出处《自然辩证法研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第9期22-26,共5页 Studies in Dialectics of Nature

基金教育部人文社会科学研究一般项目"当代西方科学论的经济学转向研究"(12YJA720019)

关键词科学知识经济学新科学经济学优先权 economics of scientific knowledge new economics of science priority

分类号 N031 [自然科学总论—科学技术哲学]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献14

1D. Wade Hands. Conjectures and Reputations: The Sociology of Sci- entific Knowledge and the History of Economic Thought[J]. History of Political Economy, 1997,29 (4).
2D. Wade Hands. The Sociology of Scientific Knowledge: Some Thoughts on the Possibilities[C]// Philip Mirowski and Esther- Mirjam Sent(eds). Science Bought and Sold:Essays in the Econom- ics of Science. Chicago:the University of Chicago Press,2002.
3汉兹.开放的经济学方法论[M].武汉大学出版社,2009.
4Jesfis. P. Zamora Bonilla. The Economics of Scientific Knowledge [C]// U. Maki (ed). Handbook of the Philosophy of Science, Phi- losophy of Economics. North Holland : San Diego,2012.
5Matthieu BaUandonne. New Economics of Science, Economics of Sci- entific Knowledge and Sociology of Science: the case of Paul David [J]. Journal of Economic Methodology, 2012,19 ( 4 ).
6Shi Yanfei. the Economics of Scientific Knowledge: A Rational Choice Neo -Insitutionalist Theory of Science [M]. Chehenham: Edward Elgar, 2001.
7Partha Dasgupta, Paul A. David. Toward a New Economics of Science [C]// Philip Mirowski and Esther- Mirjam Sent(eds. ). Science Bought and Sold: Essays in the Economics of Science. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press ,2002.
8Christoph Luetge. Economics in Philosophy of Science:a Dismal Con- tribution ? [J]. Synthese, 2004,140 ( 3 ).
9Philip Kitcher. The Advancement of Science:Science Without Legend,Ob- jectivity Without Illusions [M]. New York :Oxford University Press,1993.
10Michael Strevens. The Role of the Priority Rule in Science[J]. The Journal of Philosophy ,2003,100 ( 2 ).