期刊文献+

刍议医疗诉讼中法官的自由裁量权 被引量:1

Judiciary Discretion in Medical Lawsuit
下载PDF
导出
摘要 严格适用法律是法官的天职,但各国司法实践中法官普遍存在着自由裁量问题。医疗诉讼案件的高度专业化的特性、医事法律的不周延性和滞后性,不仅提高了审判难度,也增大法官自由裁量空间。实现医疗诉讼中法官自由裁量权的平衡,需建立专业医疗诉讼法官队伍,克服医疗纠纷案件惯有的审判情结,限定自由裁量权的行使边界,平衡司法能动与司法克制的关系,在质证、认证中适度的司法能动。以减少医疗诉讼负面效应,化解医患纠纷,实现公正的医疗司法。 Applying the law strictly is bounden duty of the judiciary. However, there is judiciary discretion in juridical practice in the world. The highly specialized medical lawsuit and unthoughtful hysteretic medical law increase the difficulty of the trial and the space of judiciary discretion. In order to keep the balance of judges discretion, we need to set up a professional medical lawsuit judge team, conquer the customary complex of medical dispute cases, restrict the boundary of discretion, balance judicial activism and judicial restraint relationship and keep proper judicial activism in cross-examination and authentication. In that case, it can reduce medical lawsuit negative effects, defuse medical dispute and realize justice of medical judicial.
出处 《医学与哲学(A)》 北大核心 2016年第9期77-79,共3页 Medicine & Philosophy:Humanistic & Social Medicine Edition
基金 2014年度四川省哲学社会科学重点研究基地四川医事卫生法治研究中心项目 项目编号:YF14-Q09 YF14-Q13
关键词 医疗诉讼 司法能动 司法克制 自由裁量权 medical lawsuit, judicial activism, judicial restraint, discretion
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献33

  • 1马骏驹,聂德宗.当前我国司法制度存在的问题与改进对策[J].法学评论,1998,16(6):25-39. 被引量:97
  • 2[英]韦廉.韦德.徐炳,等译.行政法[M].北京:中国大百科全书出版社,1997.
  • 3Blach Law Dictionary (5th Ed) , West Publishing Co. 1979 , p. 419.
  • 4向泽选.法律监督:理念、机制与改革[M].北京:法律出版社,2010.
  • 5Mello M M. Understanding medical malpractice insurance [EB/OL]. (2006-07-05) [2013-01-151. http://www, rwjf. org/pr/synthesis/ reports_and briefs/pdf/noB_primer, pdf/.
  • 6U. S. Department of Health and Human Services. Confronting the new health care crisis, improving health care quality and lowering costs by fixing our medical liability system [EB/OL]. (2002-07-24)[2013- 12 - 25 ]. ht t p : / / aspe. hhs. gov/daltcp/report s/litrefm, htm.
  • 7Mohr JC. American medical malpractice litigation in historical perspective [J]. MAMA,2000,283(13) ,1731-1737.
  • 8Fraser J Jr,Committee on Medical Liability. Alternative dispute resolution in medical malpractice[J]. Pediatrics,2001,107(3) :602-607.
  • 9American Tort Association. State and federal reforms[EB/OL]. [2013 04- 24]. http : / / www. atra. org/reforms/.
  • 10Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation, Department o{ Health and Human Services. Conronting the new health care crisis improving health care quality and lowering costs by fixing our medical liability systern[EB/OL]. (2002-07-24)[2013- 10 -09]. http:// www. cns. org/advocacy/wc/archives/mlr/HHSReport 7 - 02. pdf.

共引文献10

同被引文献19

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部