限制性液体复苏联合损伤控制手术在严重多发伤伴低血容量性休克急诊救治中的意义被引量：24

Limited fluids resuscitation(LFR) and damage control surgery(DCS) in the emergency treatment of severe multiple injuries with hemorrhagic shock

下载PDF

导出

摘要目的探讨和总结限制性液体复苏联合损伤控制手术在严重多发伤低血容量性休克急诊救治中的意义。方法对2012年3月至2015年3月中国医科大学附属盛京医院收治的51例严重多发伤伴低血容量性休克患者采取限制性液体复苏联合损伤控制手术救治(实验组),并与2003年3月至2012年3月收治的50例采取限制性液体复苏联合常规手术方法救治的严重多发伤伴低血容量性休克患者(对照组1)、44例充分液体复苏联合损伤控制性手术方法救治的严重多发伤伴低血容量性休克患者(对照组2)以及46例充分液体复苏和常规手术方法救治的严重多发伤伴低血容量性休克患者(对照组3)进行成功率比较。结果实验组抢救成功34例,成功率66.7%;死亡17例,死亡率33.3%。对照组1抢救成功24例,成功率48.0%;死亡26例,死亡率52.0%。对照组2抢救成功21例,成功率47.7%;死亡23例,死亡率52.3%。对照组3抢救成功16例,成功率34.8%;死亡30例,死亡率65.2%。实验组与对照组3比较,成功率和死亡率差异均有显著性意义(P<0.05),与其他对照组比较差异无显著性意义(P>0.05)。各对照组间成功率和死亡率比较,差异均无显著性意义(P>0.05)。结论在严重多发伤伴低血容量性休克抢救治疗中,限制性液体复苏联合损伤控制性手术具有至关重要作用。 Objective To discuss the application of limited fluids resuscitiation （LFR）and Damage control surgery （DCS） in the emergency treatment of severe multiple injuries with hemorrhagic shock. Methods Retrospective analysis of 51 patients of severe multiple injuries with hemorrhagic shock, who were treated by LFR and DCS from March 2012 to March 2015（experimental group）, was performed and compared with 50 patients of severe multiple injuries with hemorrhagic shock treated by LFR and Definitive operation （DO） from March 2003 to March 2012 （control group 1）; 44 patients of severe multiple injuries with hemorrhagic shock treated by Routine fluids resuscitiation （RFR） and DCS from March 2003 to March 2012 （control group 2） and 46 patients of severe multiple injuries with hemorrhagic shock treated by RFR and DO from March 2003 to March 2012 （control group 3）. Results The treatment success rate and mortality rate were 66.7% and 33.3%, respectively in experimental group, 48% and 52% in control group 1, 47.7% and 52.3% in control group 2, 34.8% and 65.2% in control group 3. There was significant difference between the experimental group and control group 3 （P〈0.05）. There were no significant differences between the experimental group and other two control groups, as well as within control groups （P〉0.05）. Conclusion LFR and DCS have a significant effect on severe multiple injuries with hemorrhagic shock in the emergency treatment.

作者李力卓何松柏

机构地区首都医科大学宣武医院急诊科中国医科大学附属盛京医院急诊科

出处《大连医科大学学报》 CAS 2016年第4期344-347,共4页 Journal of Dalian Medical University

基金辽宁省科学技术计划项目(辽宁省自然科学基金计划)(2013010083-401) 沈阳市科学技术计划项目(F13-220-9-53)

关键词限制性液体复苏损伤控制手术严重多发伤低血容量性休克急诊救治 limited fluids resuscitation damage control surgery （DCS） severe multiple injuries hemorrhagic shock emergency treatment

分类号 R459.7 [医药卫生—急诊医学]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献7

1陈凛,崔建新.限制性液体复苏治疗创伤失血性休克争议与共识[J].中国实用外科杂志,2015,35(2):167-171. 被引量：42
2Ball CG. Damage control surgery [ J]. Curr Opin Crit Care, 2015,21(6) :538 -543.
3Krausz AA, Krausz MM, Picetti E. Maxillofacial and neck trauma: a damage control approach [ J ]. World J Emerg Surg, 2015,10:31.
4Duke MD, Guidry C, Guice J, et al. Restrictive fluid re- suscitation in combination with damage control resuscita- tion: time for adaptation [ J ]. J Trauma Acute Care Surg, 2012,73 (3) :674 - 678.
5Rossaint R, Bouillon B, Cerny V, et al. Management of bleeding following major trauma: an updated European guideline[J]. Crit Care, 2010,14(2):R52.
6Lu B, Li MQ, Li JQ. The Use of Limited Fluid Resuscita- tion and Blood Pressure - Controlling Drugs in the Treat- ment of Acute Upper Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage Concomi- tant with Hemorrhagic Shock [ J ]. Cell Biochem Biophys, 2015,72(2) :461 -463.
7Dutton RP. Resuscitation : when less is more[ J]. Anesthe- siology, 2011,114(1) : 16 - 17.

二级参考文献22

1低血容量休克复苏指南(2007)[J].中国实用外科杂志,2007,27(8):581-587. 被引量：233
2O'Reilly D,Mahendran K,West A, et al. Opportunities for im-provement in the management of patients who die from haemor-rhage after trauma[j]. Br J Surg,2013,100(6):749-755.
3Santry HP, Alam HB. Fluid resuscitation: past, present, and thefuture[j]. Shock,2010,33(3):229-241.
4Bonanno FG. Hemorrhagic shock: the "physiology approach,[j]. J Emerg Trauma Shock,2012,5(4):285-295.
5Nishi K, Takasu A, Shinozaki H, et al. Hemodilution as a resultof aggressive fluid resuscitation aggravates coagulopathy in a ratmodel of uncontrolled hemorrhagic shock [j]. J Trauma AcuteCare Surg,2013,74(3) :808-812.
6Solomonov E, Hirsh M, Yahiya A,et al. The effect of vigorousfluid resuscitation in uncontrolled hemorrhagic shock after mas-sive splenic injury [j]. Crit Care Med, 2000,28(3):749-754.
7Volland M,Lienert M,Horstmann 0. Gasless balloon laparoscopy[j]. Surg Endoso,2010,24(7): 1566-1572.
8Russo A. Negative and positive prognostic factors in polytrauma,especially referring to "golden hour"[j]. Ann Ital Chir,2009,80(5):337-349.
9Cotton BA, Guy JS, Morris JA, et al. The cellular, metabolic,and systemic consequences of aggressive fluid resuscitationstrategies[ J]. Shock,2006,26(2): 115-121.
10Nirula R,Maier R,Moore E,et al. Scoop and run to the traumacenter or stay and play at the local hospital: hospital transfer'seffect on mortality [ J]. J Trauma,2010,69⑶:595-601.