肿瘤学核心期刊零被引论文率与引文特征分析

Rate of Non-Cited Core Oncological Journal Articles and Their Citation Features

以肿瘤学九种核心期刊2013年发表的零被引论文为研究对象,借助SPSS显著性检验与方差分析统计各期刊的零被引论文率(RNCA)以及零被引论文的标题、作者以及引文特征.发现RNCA可以作为期刊评价的辅助性参照指标,标题长度与下载量之间呈正相关,不同作者人数的论文下载量之间存在显著性差异,引文来源、内容及形式具有一定共性,表明RNCA对于期刊评价的研究有一定的参考意义.

Based on the non-cited articles published in nine core oncological journals in 2013, the paper investigates rate of non-cited articles（RNCA） and the titles, researchers as well as citation features with the aid of significance test and variance analysis provided by SPSS software. It is found that the RNCA could be used as an auxiliary reference indicator to assess journals. The length of titles is positively correlated with the downloads.Meanwhile, the number of authors affects the downloads significantly. Furthermore, their citation sources, contents and forms exhibit certain similarities. The rate of non-cited articles provides useful reference for the assessment of scientific journals.