摘要
《石林诗话》中有很多批评元祐诗学代表人物苏轼、黄庭坚的言论,《四库全书总目提要》即因此认为其"阴抑元祐",即对元祐诗学故意贬损,这一说法有失偏颇。实际上,南渡时期其他的诗论或诗话虽然在论诗方法上与元祐诗学一脉相承,对苏、黄等人也评价颇高,但它们对元祐诗学产生的流弊也已经有所认识、对其作诗方法的片面性亦有所纠正。而且,这些诗论也并不满足将苏、黄作为诗人学诗的最高范式,而进一步追踪唐贤甚至是《文选》中的诗歌。《石林诗话》所表现出的论诗特点实际上广泛存在于南渡诗论之中。
The Summary of General Catalogue of Imperial Collection of Four regards that Shilin, s Poetry Comments intentionally disparage “Yuanyou Poetics”. This statement is biased. Su Shi, Huang Tingjian, who were the representative of“Yuanyou poetics”. Although, other Poetry Comment in Nandu Period have a lot of places inherited “Yuanyou poetics”,there are also some reflection and correction in them. Moreover, they were not satisfied with the ^Yuanyou poetics5 5as the highest poetry paradigms.In fact , the views of Shilinys Po-etry Comments is widespread in the other poetics in the Nandu Period.
出处
《燕山大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》
2016年第3期125-129,共5页
Journal of Yanshan University:Philosophy and Social Science
关键词
《石林诗话》
南渡诗学
元祐诗学
Shilinys Poetry Comments
poetics in the Nandu Period
“Yuanyou Poetics”