期刊文献+

腹腔镜与小切口胆囊切除术治疗胆囊结石临床分析 被引量:7

下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的对比腹腔镜与小切口胆囊切除术(LC)治疗胆囊结石的效果。方法随机将78例胆囊结石患者分为2组,各39例。观察组行LC,对照组行小切口胆囊切除术,比较2组治疗效果。结果观察组患者手术时间和术中出血量、术后下床活动时间、肛门排气时间等观察指标均优于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论与小切口胆囊切除术相比,LC手术时间短、出血量少、术后患者康复较快、并发症少。应根据患者具体病情、经济条件、医院设备和医生技术水平等因素综合分析,合理选择术式。
作者 王兴军
出处 《河南外科学杂志》 2016年第6期74-75,共2页 Henan Journal of Surgery
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献15

  • 1贺声,邱保安,张云山,白宏伟,白钢.超声引导下经皮胆囊穿刺引流术治疗老年人急性胆囊炎46例报告[J].第二军医大学学报,2005,26(12):1445-1446. 被引量:14
  • 2Tambyraja AL, Kumar S, Nixon SJ. Outcome of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients 80 years and older [ J ]. World J Surg, 2004,28 (8) :745-748.
  • 3Seale AK, Ledet WP. Minicholecystctomy: a safe, cost-effective day surgery procedure [ J ]. Arch surg, 1999,134 ( 3 ) :308-310.
  • 4McMahon AJ. Laparoscopic versus minilaparotomy cholecystectomy [J]. Lancet,2003,343 : 135-138.
  • 5Annamaneni PK, Moratis D, Cayten CG. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in elderly[ J]. JSLS,2005,9(4) :408-410.
  • 6Yi N J, Han HS, Min Sk. The safety of a laparoscopic cholecystectomy in acute cholecystitis in high-risk patients older than sixty with stratification based on ASA score [ J ]. Minim Invasive THer Allied Techol, 2006,15(3) :159-164.
  • 7Nuzzo, GD, Giuliante F, Persiani R. The risk of biliary duetal injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy [ J ]. J Chit ( Paris ), 2004, 141 (6) :343-353.
  • 8Simopoulos C, Botaitis S, Polychronidis A, et al. Risk factors for conversion of laparoscopic cholecystectomy to open cholecystecoty [ J ]. Surg Endosc,2005,19 ( 7 ) :905-909.
  • 9Dwyer PJ, Murphy JJ, Higgins NJ. Cholecystectomy through a 5cm subcostai incision [ J ]. Br Surg,2002,77 (10) : 1189-1192.
  • 10Andriescanu L, Patrascanu E, Danila R, et al. Acute surgical pathology in elderly patients [J]. Rev Med Chir Soc Med Nat lasi,2005, 109(2) :286-289.

共引文献15

同被引文献60

引证文献7

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部