期刊文献+

经椎间孔经皮内镜治疗复发性腰椎间盘突出症 被引量:39

Efficacy of Percutaneous Transforaminal Microendoscopy Discectomy for Recurrent Lumbar Disc Herniation
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨经椎间孔经皮内镜治疗复发性腰椎间盘突出症的早期疗效。方法 2011年10月~2014年6月我科对32例复发性腰椎间盘突出症采用经椎间孔经皮内镜腰椎间盘切除术,采用腰腿痛VAS评分、Oswestry功能障碍指数(Oswestry disability index,ODI)和改良Mac Nab疗效标准评定评价早期疗效。结果 32例术后随访12~26个月,术前腰痛VAS(7.2±2.1)分,术后3个月(2.9±1.8)分,差异有统计学意义(q=14.325,P〈0.05),术后1年(2.3±1.0)分,与术后3个月比较差异无统计学意义(q=1.999,P〉0.05);改善率(75.8±12.4)%。术前腿痛VAS评分中位数9.1分(4.1~9.9分),术后3个月中位数2.4分(1.5~4.0分),差异有统计学意义(Z=-4.937,P=0.000),术后1年中位数2.1分(1.2~3.0分),与术后3个月比较差异无统计学意义(Z=-1.609,P=0.108);改善率(72.1±10.2)%。ODI术前55.4±10.2,术后3个月22.6±6.2,术后1年8.5±5.3,差异有统计学意义(F=325.90,P=0.000);改善率(86.8±10.2)%。改良Mac Nab疗效评定标准:优14例,良12例,可4例,差2例,优良率81.2%(26/32)。结论经椎间孔经皮内镜治疗复发性腰椎间盘突出症疗效满意。 Objective To discuss the efficacy of percutaneous transforaminal microendoscopy discectomy in the treatment of recurrent lumbar disc herniation. Methods A total of 32 cases of recurrent lumbar disc herniation underwent percutaneous transforaminal microendoscopy discectomy by the same surgical team from October 2011 to June 2014. Early effects were observed by using the VAS scales of lower back pain and leg pain, the 0swestry disability index (0DI) , and the modified MaeNab criteria. Results All the cases were followed up for 12-26 months. The lower back pain VAS scores were (7.2+2.1), (2.9+1.8), and (2.3 _+ 1. 0) points at preoperative, 3 month postoperative and 1 year postoperative time, respectively. There was statistical significance between preoperative and 3 month postoperative scores (q = 14. 325, P 〈 0.05) , while no statistical significance was seen between 3 month postoperative and 1 year postoperative (q = 1. 999, P 〉 0.05). The average improvement rate was (75.8 ±12.4) %. The preoperative, 3 month postoperative and 1 year postoperative leg pain VAS scores (median) were 9. 1, 2.4, and 2. 1 points, respectively. There was statistical significance between preoperative and 3 month postoperative scores (Z = - 4. 937, P = 0. 000) , while no statistical significance between 3 month postoperative and 1 year postoperative scores was seen (Z = - 1. 609, P = 0. 108). The average improvement rate was (72.1 ± 10.2)%. The preoperative, 3 month postoperative and 1 year postoperative ODIs were 55.4 ±10.2, 22. 6 ± 6. 2, and 8.5 ± 5.3, respectively, with statistically significant difference ( F = 325. 90, P = 0. 000). The average improvement rate was ( 86.8 ± 10.2) % . The modified MacNab efficacy evaluation showed excellent in 14 patients, good in 12 patients, fair in 4 patients, and poor in 2 patients, the excellent and good rate being 81.2% (26/32). Conclusion The posterior microendoseopy discectomy can achieve satisfactory clinical results in treating recurrent lumbar disc herniation.
出处 《中国微创外科杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 2016年第9期820-823,832,共5页 Chinese Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgery
基金 广西教育厅中青年教师基础能力提升项目资助(项目编号:KY2016YX148)
关键词 复发性腰椎间盘突出症 椎间孔镜 Recurrent lumbar disc herniation Transforaminal microendoscopy
  • 相关文献

参考文献19

  • 1Park JS, Choi SE, Cho TK, et al. Recurrence rate after herniotomyonly versus discectomy in lumbar disc herniation. Korean J Spine,2013,10(4) :227 -231.
  • 2Suk KS, Lee HM, Moon SH, et al. Recurrent lumbar discherniation : results of operative management. Spine , 2001,26 ( 6 ) :672 -676.
  • 3Gaston P , Marshall RW. Survival analysis is a better estimate ofrecurrent disc herniation. J Bone Joint Surg Br ,2003,85 ( 4 ) :535 -537.
  • 4Choi KB, Lee DY, Lee SH. Contralateral reherniation after openlumbar microdiscectomy: a comparison with ipsilateral reherniation. JKorean Neurosurg Soc ,2008 ,44(5) :320 - 326.
  • 5Wang M,Zhou Y, Wang J, et al. A 10-year follow-up study on longtermclinical outcomes of lumbar microendoscopic discectomy. JNeurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg ,2012 ,73(4) :195 -198.
  • 6Lee JK, Amorosa L, Cho SK, et al. Recurrent lumbar diskherniation. J Am Acad Orthop Surg, 2010, 18(6) :327 -337.
  • 7Gibson JN, Waddell G. Surgical interventions for lumbar discprolapse : updated Cochrane Review. Spine ( Phila Pa 1976 ),2007, 32(16) : 1735 - 1747.
  • 8Ruetten S, Komp M, Merk H, et al. Recurrent lumbar discherniation after conventional discectomy: a prospective, randomizedstudy comparing full-endoscopic interlaminar and transforaminalversus microsurgical revision. J Spinal Disord Tech, 2009, 2 2 (2 ) :122 - 129.
  • 9李柱海,曾建成,宋跃明,孔清泉,王贤帝,陈果,聂鸿飞,蒋虎山.经皮内镜椎间孔入路微创治疗复发性腰椎间盘突出症疗效分析[J].中国修复重建外科杂志,2015,29(1):43-47. 被引量:43
  • 10Hoogland T, van den Brekel-Dijkstra K, Schubert M, et al.Endoscopic transforaminal discectomy for recurrent lumbar discherniation : a prospective, cohort evaluation of 262 consecutivecases. Spine,2008,33(9) :973 -978.

二级参考文献48

  • 1俞杭平,范顺武,杨惠林,唐天驷.腰椎间盘突出合并椎体后缘离断症的治疗[J].中华骨科杂志,2006,26(3):170-174. 被引量:18
  • 2章荣,周蜜娟,尤冉.腰部伸屈肌肌力训练治疗腰椎间盘突出症疗效观察[J].西部医学,2006,18(6):722-723. 被引量:1
  • 3赵振东,梁胜根.后路微创治疗腰椎间盘突出症43例[J].中华显微外科杂志,2007,30(2):153-155. 被引量:8
  • 4黄民锋,李明,陈锋,许建文,李寿斌,贾经汉,邹冬青,袁振超.腰椎间盘突出并椎体后缘离断症的手术治疗[J].中国脊柱脊髓杂志,2007,17(8):596-599. 被引量:18
  • 5Yeung AT,Yeung CA.Advances in endoscopic disc and spine surgery: foraminal approach. Surg Teehnol Int, 2003,11:255 - 263.
  • 6Hoogland T, Schubert M, Miklitz B, et al. Tramsforaminal posterolateral endoscopic discectomy with or without the combination of a lowdose chymopapain : a prospective ran- domized study in 280 consecutive cases. Spine, 2006,31 : E890 - E897.
  • 7Yan DL, Pei FX, Li J, et al. Comparative study of PILF and TLIF treatment in adult degenerative spondylolisthesis. Eurspine J, 2008,17:1311 - 1316.
  • 8Fairbank JC. Pynsent PB. The Oswestry disability index. Spine, 2000,25 : 2940 - 2952.
  • 9MacNab I. Negative disc exploration. An analysis of the causes of nerve root involvement in sixty-eight patients. J Bone Joint Surg(Am), 1971,53:891 - 903.
  • 10Hart MY,Suen PW. Clinical outcomes after lumbar disceetomy for sciatica:the effects of fragment type and ular competem[J]. J Bone Joint Surg(Am),2003,85( 1 ): 102-108.

共引文献228

同被引文献276

引证文献39

二级引证文献516

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部