卡尔松肯定美学指瑕

Dissent again about the Positive Aesthetics of Carlson

卡尔松肯定美学的一些问题来源于其对沃尔顿的"恰当审美"理论模型的转换应用,并且衍生出一些新的问题。他的科学认知模式作为一种自然鉴赏方式完全合理,但若强势介入自然审美便有些勉强。传统的无利害审美观其实并无不妥,因为无利害要求是针对审美主体而非审美对象。卡尔松的肯定美学是对"人类中心主义"的矫枉过正,并有可能会产生一些事与愿违的情况。

The problems of Carlson＇s Positive Aesthetics stem from his conversion application from Walton＇s theory model of＂Appropriate Aesthetic Appreciation＂,and derived some new problems. His scientific cognitive model as a way of natural appreciation is completely reasonable,but if it strong to intervene in the natural aesthetic is somewhat reluctantly. The traditional aesthetic idea of disinterestedness is there is nothing wrong with this,because the requirement of the disinterestedness is for aesthetic subject rather than the object. Carlson ＇s Positive Aesthetics can be considered a hypercorrection of ＂anthropocentrism＂,and it may produce some backfire.