期刊文献+

论当代不分类属的本体论

Towards the Ontology of Ahuman in the Age of Contemporaneity
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在最近涌现的诸多学者中,麦克卢汉关于"媒介即人的延伸"的观点已被新的观点所取代。新观点认为,技术不再被当作工具,而成为人们思考的基础;随之,主体与客体关乎社会的观点也被主体与客体主要与技术相关联的理念所取代。此论点聚焦于思考人类与技术之间的关系应该是生命概念本身,就像是资本主义的公理一样。生命本身既有有机又有无机状态,一方面通过去领土化过程产生(资本原理),另一方面通过归域过程产生(国家)。主体、客体和技术通过这两种过程产生。只有完善不分类属的本体论,而不是仅仅关注非人类、非有机体和后人类的本体论,人类才能真正进入当代。 Among the more recent scholars,Mc Luhan's conception of media and technology as an extension of the human has been replaced by the conception according to which technology is no longer simply a tool,but the basis of thinking the human in general,so instead of thinking the subject and the body in relation to the social,the subject and the body are thought primarily through their relations with technology. The point of contention in thinking the relations between the human and technology should be the concept of life itself as it is produced within the capitalist axiomatic. Life itself,as both organic and nonorganic,is produced by the processes of deterritorialization on the one hand( capitalist axiomatic) and the processes of reterritorialization( the State) on the other hand,and by including these two processes in production of the subject,the body and technology,I will show in this paper that only by developing the ontology of the ahuman,as opposed to the ontology of the nonhuman,the inhuman and the posthuman,one can critically approach the age of contemporaneity.
出处 《北京科技大学学报(社会科学版)》 2016年第3期40-44,共5页 Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing(Social Sciences Edition)
关键词 技术 本体论 人类 非人类 非有机体 不分类属 technology ontology human nonhuman nonorganic ahuman
  • 相关文献

参考文献24

  • 1Teri Smit,Pitanje savremenosti,in:Teri Smit,Savremena umetnost i savremenost,Orion art,2014,p.26.
  • 2Cf.ibid.,p.34.
  • 3Gilles Deleuze,Postscript on Control Societies,in:Gilles Deleuze,Negotiations 1972-1992,Columbia University Press,1995,pp.178-179.
  • 4Cf.Donna Haraway,Simians,Cyborgs,and Women:The Reinvention of Nature,Routledge,1990.
  • 5What I especially have in mind are Massumi's six theses on animal to be avoided:1.Do not presume that you have access to a criterion for categorically separating the human from the animal.The criterion most widely called into service is language.[...]2.Do not mistake creativity for a diversion of instinct into symbolic realms(sublimation)...In nature,creativity and instinct are inextricably intertwined.[...]3.Do not prophesy with too much gravitas the end of the human and the dawn of a posthuman age.Such pronouncements must often assume the ability to categorically separate the human from the animal.[...]4.Don't be mistaken into thinking that the more-than-human is outside,surrounding the human,in the environment.The more-than-human is also in the very makeup of the human.For the human body is an animal body,and animality is immanent to human life(and vice versa).[...]5.Do not hold out hope that the category of inorganic matter will save the categorical day by providing an empirical dividing line enabling you to parse out where animality,consciousness,and life begin and end.[...]6....If everything is alive,it is because the expressive gestures of nature go a-bodying.Bodyings-without-'the'-body,for subjectivities-without-a-subject.If everything is alive,it is because life lives its own abstraction,its every gesture a pragmatic speculation on nature in the making",Brian Massumi,What Animal Teach Us about Politics,Duke University Press,2014,pp.91-97.
  • 6Gilles Deleuze and Félix Guattari,A Thousand Plateaus,Continuum,2004,pp.509-510.
  • 7Gilles Deleuze and Félix Guattari,A Thousand Plateaus,Continuum,2004,p.510.
  • 8Cf.Maurizio Lazzarato,Signs and Machines:Capitalism and the Production of Subjectivity,Semiotext(e),2014,p.12.
  • 9Cf.Gilles Deleuze and Félix Guattari,A Thousand Plateaus,Continuum,2004,pp.516-518.
  • 10To be quite precise,these axioms are also about production of different time compared to the time of movement of capital and its general axiomatic.For onto-political relations between time,space and art in Deleuze's philosophy cf.Gilles Deleuze,?Occupy Without Counting:Boulez,Proust,and Time",in:Gilles Deleuze,Two Regimes of Madness:Texts and Interviews,1975-1995,New York:Semiotext(e),2007,pp.292-299.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部