期刊文献+

安全依恋对人际信任的影响:依恋焦虑的调节效应 被引量:34

The effects of attachment security on interpersonal trust: The moderating role of attachment anxiety
下载PDF
导出
摘要 采用两个实验探讨了安全依恋启动对人际信任的影响,并考察了特质依恋风格的调节效应。实验1采用回忆书写任务启动安全依恋,采用3(启动分组:安全依恋启动,积极情绪启动,中性启动)×3(目标词类型:信任相关词,信任无关词,非词)混合实验设计考察了不同启动分组对信任词汇反应时的影响。结果发现,与积极情绪启动组和中性启动组相比,安全依恋启动能显著提高信任的词汇决策反应时,特质依恋焦虑起调节效应。实验2采用被试间设计,考察安全依恋启动对信任博弈任务中信任决策的影响,结果发现,安全依恋启动组被试在信任决策中分配的金额显著高于中性组被试,特质依恋焦虑起调节效应。研究结果验证了安全依恋对人际信任的"拓延–建构环"效应,对于促进社会信任的提升具有积极的现实意义。 Both interpersonal trust and attachment are important aspects of human interpersonal relationship. Interpersonal trust is not only one of the most essential quality of intimate relationship, but also a necessary condition for development of commitment and a sense of security. And it includes a variety of people's positive expectations for their partner’s availability, response and caring, all of which are core components of attachment. Attachment is the most important emotional intimacy band through the whole life of an individual, the security base effect of safety attachment affects all aspects of interpersonal and social adaptation of the individuals. The securely attached persons hold positive attitudes toward the availability, sensitivity and reactivity of their partner's responses when they in need, so they will experience higher levels of trust. Previous studies only focused on the relationship between dispositional attachment and interpersonal trust, while recently years, researchers have transformed their focus from dispositional attachment to situational attachment and its positive effect on interpersonal trust. Therefore, present research aimed to examine the impact of attachment security priming on interpersonal trust, and to further extend the Broaden and Build Cycle of attachment security, so as to explore the effective ways to improve individual interpersonal trust. This research adopted two studies to examine the impact of attachment security on interpersonal trust. A 3 (priming groups: attachment security, positive mood, control group) × 3 (target type: trust-related word, trust-unrelated word, non-word) mixed experimental design was conducted in Study 1. After completing the Experiences in Close Relationships scales (ECR) and Interpersonal Trust Scales (ITS), 100 college students were randomly assigned into three priming groups, respectively for attachment security, positive mood and control group. Then all of them finished lexical decision tasks, the target word respectively was trust-related word, trust-unrelated word, and non-word. Study 2 adopted the trust game paradigm to explore the interpersonal trust behavior. 65 college students completed the ECR and ITS one week ago. And then they were randomly assigned into two priming groups, respectively for attachment security and control group. Finally, all the participants finished the trust game task. The results of Study 1 showed that the attachment security priming group’s reaction time of trust-related word was significantly lower than positive mood priming group and control group, and there was non-significant difference between positive mood priming group and control group. The results also found the moderating effect of attachment anxiety. Study 2 indicated that, the participants of attachment security priming group showed more trust behavior than control group, and attachment anxiety moderated the attachment security and trust. These results revealed that attachment security priming could effectively improve the interpersonal trust, and the effect was independent of positive mood priming. The dispositional attachment also served as the moderating role between attachment security priming and interpersonal trust. All of these results confirmed the positive effects of Broaden and Build Cycle of attachment security.
出处 《心理学报》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2016年第8期989-1001,共13页 Acta Psychologica Sinica
基金 国家社科基金项目(15BRK018)
关键词 安全依恋的拓延-建构环 特质依恋风格 安全依恋启动 人际信任 broaden and build cycle of attachment security dispositional attachment style attachment securitypriming interpersonal trust
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献108

  • 1温忠麟,张雷,侯杰泰,刘红云.中介效应检验程序及其应用[J].心理学报,2004,36(5):614-620. 被引量:7630
  • 2陈宝国,彭聃龄.汉语双字多义词的识别优势效应[J].心理学报,2001,33(4):300-304. 被引量:11
  • 3庞彤彤,宋凤宁.大学生人际信任度研究[J].社会心理科学,2006,21(1):63-66. 被引量:42
  • 4[1]Kellas G,Ferraro F R,Simpson G B.Lexical ambiguity and the time course of attentional allocation in word recognition.Journal of Experimental Psychology:Human Perception and Performance,1988,14 (4):601~609
  • 5[2]Borowsky R,Masson M E.Semantic ambiguity effects in word identification.Journal of Experimental Psychology:Learning,Memory and Cognition,1996,22 (1):63~85
  • 6[3]Hino Y,Lupker S J.Effects of polysemy in lexical decision and naming-alternative to lexical access accounts.Journal of Experimental Psychology:Human Perception and Performance,1996,22,1331~1356
  • 7[4]Jastrzembski J E.Multiple meaning,number of related meaning,frequency of occurrence,and the lexicon.Cognitive Psychology,1981,13,278~3059
  • 8[5]Rueckle J G.Ambiguity and connectionist networks:Still setting into a solution:Commentary on Joordens and Besner (1994).Journal of Experimental Psychology:Learning,Memory,and Cognition,1995,21,501~508
  • 9王春茂,彭聃龄.多词素词的通达表征:分解还是整体[J].心理科学,2000,23(4):395-398.
  • 10[11]Azuma T,Van Ordan G C.Why SAFE Is Better Than FAST:The relatedness of a word's meaning affects lexical decision time.Journal of Memory and Language,1997,36,484~504

共引文献3647

同被引文献353

引证文献34

二级引证文献145

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部