期刊文献+

论卫生资源公平分配的平等主义、优先主义和充足主义 被引量:2

Study on the Equality,Prioritarianism and Sufficientarianism for the Fair Health Allocation
下载PDF
导出
摘要 西方国家关于资源公平分配的讨论常见有平等主义、优先主义和充足主义三种理论,它们深刻影响着西方国家卫生资源福利分配政策、卫生资源重点投向、医疗保险等宏观体制设计。人们已经意识到卫生资源消耗少、覆盖人群广、卫生福利水平高是不相容的期待,我国如何平衡取舍这些目标,应当借助三种理论展开评价思考。 Equality, prioritarianism and sufficientarianism are the three common theories on fair resource allocation that affects the macro system strategy such as the western welfare policy, health priority setting and medical insurance. As the low resource, wide coverage and high level of welfare are the incompatible goals, the three theories may provide a way for China' s priority setting and evaluation on health.
作者 峗怡
出处 《西南政法大学学报》 2016年第3期43-49,共7页 Journal of Southwest University of Political Science and Law
基金 2013年度国家社科基金青年项目"卫生资源优先次序分配的伦理机制及评价研究"(13CZX082) 2016年度西南政法大学引进人才科研资助项目"卫生资源优先次序配置研究"(2016-XZRCXM002)
关键词 平等主义 优先主义 充足主义 卫生资源 公平分配 equality prioritarianism sufficientarianism health resource fair allocation
  • 相关文献

参考文献19

  • 1A.M.Buyx.Personal Responsibility for Health as a Rationing Criterion:Why We Don’t Like It and Why Maybe We Should[J].Journal of Medical Ethics,2008,34(12):871-874.
  • 2R.Dworkin.Sovereign Virtue:The Theory and Practice of Equality[M].Cambridge and Massachusetts:Harvard University Press,2000.
  • 3A.W.Cappelen.Responsibility in Health Care:A Liberal Egalitarian Approach[J].Journal of Medical Ethics,2005,31(8):476-80.
  • 4G.Cohen.On the Currency of Egalitarian Justice[J].Ethics,1989,99:906-44.
  • 5Elizabeth S.Anderson.What Is the Point of Equality?[J].Ethics,1999,109(2):287-337.
  • 6Richard J.Arneson.Equality and Equal Opportunity for Welfare[G]//L.P.Pojman,R.Westmoreland.Equality:Selected Readings.New York and Oxford:Oxford University Press,1997:229-241.
  • 7Derek Parfit.Equality and Priority[J].Ratio(New Series),1997,10(3):202-221.
  • 8J.G.S.Wilson.Health Inequities[G]//A.Dawson.Public Health Ethics:Key Concepts and Issues in Policy and Practice.Cambridge and New York:Cambridge University Press,2011:211-230.
  • 9Norman Daniels.Just Health Care[M].Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,1985.
  • 10Richard J.Arneson.Luck Egalitarianism and Prioritarianism[J].Ethics,2000,110(2):339-349.

二级参考文献28

  • 1科恩:《为什么不要社会主义?》,段忠桥译,北京:人民出版社,2011年.
  • 2Parfit D. Equality or priority? Vallentyne P (ed.) Equality and justice, volume I. New York. Routledge, 2003.
  • 3Hohug N. Prioritarianism. Hohug N, Lippert-Rasmussen K ( ed. ) Egalitarianism . New essays on the nature and value of equality. Oxford, UK . Clarendon Press, 2007.
  • 4Larry S T. Inequality. Oxford, UK. Oxford University Press, 1993.
  • 5诺奇克:《无政府、国家和乌托邦》,姚大志译,中国社会科学出版社,2008年,第27页.
  • 6Larry S. Temkin, Inequality, Oxford University Press, 1993, p. 247.
  • 7Derek Parfit, "Equality or Priority?", in The Ideal of Equality, Matthew Clayton and Andrew Williams ed. , St. Martin's Press, 2000, pp. 97 - 98.
  • 8G.A. Cohen, Self-Ownership, Freedom, and Equality, Cambridge University Press, 1995, pp. 243 -244.
  • 9G.A. Cohen, Self-Ownership, Freedom, and Equality, Cambridge University Press, 1995, pp. 98.
  • 10Larry Temkin, "Equality, Priority, and the Levelling Down Objection", in The Ideal of Equality, Matthew Clayton and Andrew Williams ed. , St. Martin's Press, 2000, p. 132.

共引文献24

同被引文献12

引证文献2

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部