期刊文献+

希罗达联合奥沙利铂治疗老年进展期胃肠癌临床观察 被引量:1

下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨希罗达联合奥沙利铂(XELOX方案)治疗老年进展期胃肠癌的毒副反应及临床疗效。方法选择2011年4月至2015年4月扬州市江都人民医院72例老年进展期胃肠癌患者为观察对象,采用XELOX方案,统计毒副反应情况及随访观察临床疗效。结果 XELOX方案治疗老年进展期胃肠癌的毒副反应主要表现为皮肤色素沉着、手足综合征、外周神经毒性、骨髓抑制、消化道反应、肝功能受损、脱发等,多数为Ⅰ~Ⅱ度;近期疗效:CR 6例(8.33%)、PR 23例(31.94%)、SD 28例(38.89%)、PD 15例(20.83%),RR为40.28%(29/72);远期疗效:总生存期(overall survival,OS)为3.6~48.8个月,中位OS为15.7个月。TTP(time to progress,TTP)为3.8~14.2个月,中位TTP为8.4个月,95%CI为(6.0~9.6)个月。其1、3、5年生存率为66.67%(48/72),27.78%(20/72),5.56%(5/72)。结论希罗达联合奥沙利铂治疗老年晚期胃肠癌具有较好的近期及远期疗效,安全性好,毒副反应可以耐受,值得临床推广。
作者 程晨 田广玉
出处 《中国肿瘤外科杂志》 CAS 2016年第4期260-261,共2页 Chinese Journal of Surgical Oncology
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1SE V C,NG W T,LEE V,et al.Cost-analysis of XELOX andFOLFOX4 for treatment of colorectal cancer to assist decision-mak-ing on reimbursement[J].BMC Cancer,2011,11:288.
  • 2COMELLA P,MASSIDDA B,FILIPPELLI G,et al.Randomised tri-al comparing biweekly oxaliplatin plus oral capecitabine versus oxali-platin plus i.v.bolus fluorouracil / leucovorin in metastatic colorectalcancer patients:results of the Southern Italy Cooperative Oncologystudy 0401[J].J Cancer Res Clin Oncol,2009,135(2):217-226.
  • 3CHAU I,NORMAN A R,CUNNINGHAM D,et al.Multivariateprognostic factor analysis in locally advanced and metastatic esoph-ago-gastric cancer-pooled analysis from three multicenter,random-ized,controlled trials using individual patient data[J].J Clin On-col,2004,22(12):2395-2403.
  • 4CONROY T HEBBAR M,BENNOUNA J,et al.Quality-of-life find-ings from a randomised phase-Ⅲ study of XELOX vs FOLFOX-6 inmetastatic colorectal cancer[J].Br J Cancer,2010,102(1):59-67.
  • 5GRESSETT S M,STANFORD B L,HARDWICKE F.Manage-ment of hand-foot syndrome induced by capecitabine[J].J OncolPharm Pract,2006,12(3):131-141.
  • 6杨莉萍,靳海峰,王飙落,张筱茵,刘娜,梁树辉,韩霜,冯娟,吴开春,王新.奥沙利铂化学治疗方案在结直肠癌术后辅助治疗的疗效和安全性比较[J].中华消化杂志,2012,32(12):822-825. 被引量:5
  • 7ARKENAU HT,ARNOLD D,CASSIDY J,et al.Efficacy of ox-aliplatin plus capecitabine or infusional fluorouracil / leucovorin inpatients with metastatic colorectal cancer:a pooled analysis of ran-domized trials[J].J Clin Oncol,2008,26(36):5910-5917.

二级参考文献11

  • 1Conroy T, Hebbar M, Bennouna J, et al. Quality-of life findings from a randomised phase-Ⅲ study of XELOX vs FOLFOX-6 in metastatic colorectal cancer. Br J Cancer,2010,102:59-67.
  • 2Tse VC, Ng WT, Lee V,et al. Cost-analysis of XELOX and FOLFOX4 for treatment of colorectal cancer to assist decision-making on reimbursement. BMC Cancer, 2011, 11:288.
  • 3Ducreux M, Bennouna J, Hebbar M, et al. Capecitabine plus oxaliplatin (XELOX) versus 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin plus oxaliplatin (FOLFOX-6) as first-line treatment for metastatic eolorectal cancer. Int J Cancer, 2011, 128: 682-690.
  • 4Lee S 2nd, Park SH, Lim do H, et al. A retrospective study of first-line combination chemotherapy in advanced colorectal cancer: a Korean single-center experience. Cancer Res Treat, 2011,43:96-101.
  • 5Silvestris N, Maiello E, De Vita F, et al. Update on capecitabine alone and in combination regimens in colorectal cancer patients. Cancer Treat Rev, 2010, 36 Suppl 3: S46-55.
  • 6Maniadakis N, Fragoulakis V, Pectasides D, et al. XELOX versus FOLFOX6 as an adjuvant treatment in colorectal cancer : an economic analysis. Curr Med Res Opin, 2009,25 : 797-805.
  • 7Chagpar R, Xing Y, Chiang YJ, et al. Adherence to stagespecific treatment guidelines for patients with colon cancer. J Clin Oncol, 2012,30 : 972-979.
  • 8Cassidy J, Clarke S, Diaz-Rubio E, et al. XELOX vs FOLFOX-4 as first-line therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer:NO16966 updated results. Br J Cancer, 2011,105: 58-64.
  • 9Center MM, Jemal A, Smith RA, et al. Worldwide variations in colorectal cancer. CA Cancer J Clin, 2009,59 : 366-378.
  • 10王彬,时建明,姜洪兴,杨辉,张民.FOLFOX_4方案治疗晚期结直肠癌的临床观察[J].中国现代药物应用,2008,2(4):14-15. 被引量:3

共引文献4

同被引文献7

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部