期刊文献+

SBAR在手术室护理教学早查房中的应用 被引量:2

Application of SBAR for nurse students morning rounds in operation room
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:探讨SBAR(situation-现状、background-背景、assessment-评估、recommendation-建议)在手术室护理教学早查房中的效果。方法依据护生临床实习轮次抓阄确定常规组(偶数轮,A组68人)和SBAR组(奇数轮,B组70人),A组病史汇报采用常规模式,B组采用SBAR模式。使用《手术室实习护生早查房评分标准》对护生病情汇报质量进行考评,并记录汇报时间;护生在第五周填写《沟通效能感自我评价表》,将信息输入excel,并用SPSS 11.0对两组考评结果进行比较,采用卡方检验及t检验分析数据。结果 A组汇报质量考评平均16.74分,B组汇报质量考评平均18.66分,B组平均得分高于A组,对两组≥18分的例数进行比较,结果有统计学意义(P=0.039)。A组护生沟通效能感自我评价平均42.88分,B组护生沟通效能感自我评价平均44.94分,A组平均得分低于B组,二者≥45分例数比较有统计学意义(P=0.010)。A组平均用时(2.42±1.16)min,B组平均用时(2.32±1.21) min。结论运用SBAR有助于提高护生沟通效能感,提升护生病情汇报质量,值得在临床教学中推广。 Objective To identify the effect of SBAR (situation, background, assessment, recom-mendation) in OR (operating room)nursing teaching rounds. Methods According to internship turns, rou-tine group (even number, Group A:68 students) and SBAR group (odd number, Group B:70 students) were chosen by drawing lots. Group A used conventional mode for history report, while Group B used SBAR mode. Students' performance was evaluated by OR nurse students' rounds standard scale and the reporting time was recorded. Each nurse students filled in Communication Self-efficacy Evaluation Form on the fifth week in OR. The information was input into excel. The results of the two groups were compared with SPSS 11, and the data were analyzed by chi square test and t test. Results The average reporting quality score was 16.74 for Group A, and 18.66 for Group B. The average score of Group B was higher than that of Group A. Compared with the cases scores above 18 between the two groups, the result was statistically significant, P=0.039. The average score of communication Self-efficacy in Group A was 42.88, while it was 44.94 in Group B, which showed that Group B had better score than that of Group A. Significant differences was found between the two groups when compared the cases with score above 45, P=0.010. The average reporting time was (2.42±1.16) minutes for Group A and (2.32±1.21) for Group B, and there is no significant differencesbetween the 2 groups. Conclusion SBAR is helpful for improving students communication Self-efficacy, and making progress on nursing round reporting quality,and it is worth promoting in clinical teaching.
出处 《中华医学教育探索杂志》 2016年第7期699-702,共4页 Chinese Journal of Medical Education Research
基金 重庆医科大学附属第一医院护理基金(HI_JJ2013-19) 国家临床重点专科护理建设项目:国家临床重点专科建设项目
关键词 临床教学 SBAR 现状 背景 评估 建议 手术室 Clinic teaching SBAR (situation, background, assessment, recommendation) Ope-rating room
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1Sutclife KM, Lewton E, Rosenthal MM. Communication failures: an insidious contributor to medical mishaps [J]. Academic Medicine, 2004, 79(2): 186-194.
  • 2Lingard L, Espin S, Whyte S, et al. Communication failures in theoperating room: an observational classification of recurrent types and effects [J]. Quality & Safety in Health Care, 2004(13): 330- 334.
  • 3Fourcade A, Blache JL, Grenier C, et al. Barriers to staff adoption of a surgical safety checklist [J]. BMJ Qual Saf, 2012(21):191-197.
  • 4Carney BT, West P, Neily J, et al. Differences in nurse and sur- geon perceptions of teamwork: implications for use of a briefing checklist in the OR [J]. AORN J, 2010(91): 722-729.
  • 5Johnson F, Logsdon P, Fournier K, SWITCH for safety: periopera- tive hand-off tools [J]. AORN Journal, 2013, 98(5): 494-507.
  • 6Haig KM, Sutton S, Whittington J. SBAR: a shared mental model for improving communication between clinicians [J]. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Safe, 2006, 32(3): 167-175.
  • 7徐双燕,姚梅琪,周海燕.标准化沟通方式在医护间沟通中的应用[J].中华护理杂志,2012,47(1):48-49. 被引量:251
  • 8刘霞,韩雅琴,王怡华.SBAR沟通模式在CCU护士病情汇报中的应用[J].护理学杂志,2013,28(17):55-56. 被引量:73
  • 9曹玲,仲悦萍,陈晓艳.SBAR模式在神经外科监护晨交班中的应用[J].齐齐哈尔医学院学报,2014,35(20):3092-3093. 被引量:12

二级参考文献21

  • 1Sutcliffe KM,Lewton E,Rosenthal MM. Communication failures:an insidious contributor to medical mishaps[J-. Academic Medicine ,2004, 79(2) : 186-194.
  • 2The Joint Commission. Root causes:a failure to communicate:identifying and overcoming communication barriers[EB/OL].[2010-05-19], http://www. jcrinc.com/3156.
  • 3Leonard M,Graham S,Bonacum D. The human factor:the critical importance of effective teamwork and communication in providing safe care[J]. Qual Saf Health Care,2004,13(suppl 1 ) :85-90.
  • 4SBAR technique for communication:a situational briefing model [EB/ OL]. [ 2010-05-19 ].http://www.ihi.org/IHI/Topics/PatientSafetylSafetyGeneral/Tools.
  • 5John ST. SBAR communication standardization in arizona [EB/OL]. [ 2010-05 - 19 ].http ://www.azhha.org/patient _saffety/doc uments/SBA Rtoolkit_ 001 .pdf.
  • 6Bello J,Quinn P,Horrell L. Maintaining patient safety through innovation:an electronic SBAR communication tool[J]. Comput Inform Nurs, 2011,29(9) :481-483.
  • 7Freitag M,Carroll VS.Handoff communication:using failure modes and effects analysis to improve the transition in care process[J]. Qual Manag Health Care,2011,20(2) : 103-109.
  • 8Velji K. Effectiveness of an adapted SBAR communication tool for a rehabilitation setting[J]. Heahhcare Qualiterly,2008, 11:72-79.
  • 9Frank JR,L anger B. Collaboration,Communication,Management and advocacy:teaching surgeons new skills through the canMEDS project[J]. World Journal of Surgery,2003,27(8) :972-978.
  • 10Sutcliffe K M,Lewton E,Rosenthal M M.Communication failures:an insidious contributor to medical mishaps[J].Acad Med,2004,79(2):186-194.

共引文献301

同被引文献26

引证文献2

二级引证文献13

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部