期刊文献+

瘢痕子宫合并中央性前置胎盘48例分析

48 Cases Analysis of Scar Uterus with Central Placenta Previa
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的分析瘢痕子宫合并中央性前置胎盘妊娠及分娩过程中的处理方式。方法回顾性分析2005年1月1日-2014年12月31日瘢痕子宫合并中央性前置胎盘患者48例临床病理资料。结果瘢痕子宫合并中央性前置胎盘者42例,占全部瘢痕子宫住院孕妇约1.5%,占同期中央性前置胎盘住院孕妇的20.1%,是以无痛性出血为主要表现;前壁胎盘24例,后壁胎盘18例,侧壁胎盘6例;超声仅16例考虑胎盘植入,行子宫切除患者30例,胎盘位于前壁者60%患者切除子宫,42例出血>1 500 ml者中30例患者切除子宫。全部孕妇无一例死亡。结论瘢痕子宫合并中央性前置胎盘者病情凶险,尤其以前壁胎盘者为最,出血>1 500 ml时,若仍出血汹涌,应考虑切除子宫,挽救产妇生命。 Objective To analyze the approach of scar uterus with central placenta previa during pregnancy and delivery. Methods Clinical and pathological data of 48 patients with uterine scar and central placenta previa during 1 January, 2005 to December 31,2014 were retrospectivey andalyzed. Results There were 42 cases with uterine scar with central placenta previa, accounted for nearly 1.5% of hospitalized pregnant women with uterine scar, accounting for nearly 20.1% of pregnant women with central placenta previa in the same period. Painless bleeding was still mainly performance, anterior placenta, accounted for 24 cases; posterior placenta, 18 cases; uterine sidewall palcenta, 6 cases; ultrasound consider 16 cases of placenta accreta were found by ultrasonic testing, which the patients of the 60% of were anterior placenta 30 in 42 cases bleeding more than 1 500 ml were carried out hysterectomy. No death for all pregnant women. Conclusion Uterine scar with central placenta previa was dangerous, especially anterior placenta. Hysterectomy would be carried out in the cases with bleeding more than 1 500 ml blood to save maternal life.
作者 赵建国 裘瑾
出处 《中国城乡企业卫生》 2016年第7期6-8,共3页 Chinese Journal of Urban and Rural Enterprise Hygiene
关键词 瘢痕子宫 中央性前置胎盘 子宫切除 产后出血 Scaruterine Postpartum hemorrhage Hysterectomy Central placenta previa
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献49

  • 1王辉,张建华,吴味辛.植入性胎盘23例临床分析[J].实用妇产科杂志,2005,21(2):93-95. 被引量:65
  • 2张力,李萍,何国琳,刘兴会,杨太珠,罗红,田雨.经腹彩色超声多普勒在前置胎盘并发胎盘植入诊断中的价值[J].中华妇产科杂志,2006,41(12):799-802. 被引量:154
  • 3李春梅,丁跃灵.再次剖宫产术243例临床分析[J].中国妇幼保健,2007,22(3):434-435. 被引量:25
  • 4Levy R, Chernomoretz T, Appehnan Z, et al. Head pushing versus reverse breech extraction in cases of impacted fetal head during cesarean section [J]. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Rep rod Biol, 2005, 121 (1) : 242-261.
  • 5Bodner LJ, Nosher JL, Gribbin C, et al. Balloon- assisted occlusion of the intemal iliac arteries in patients with placenta accreta/perc- reta[J]. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol, 2006, 29: 354- 361.
  • 6Carnevale FC, Kondo MM, De Oliveira Sousa W, et al. Perioperative temporary occlusion of the internal iliac arteries as prophylaxis in cesarean section at risk of hemorrhage in placenta accreta[J]. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol, 2011, 34: 758- 764.
  • 7Rotas MA, Haberman S, Levgur M. Cesarean scar ectopic pregnancies: etiology, diagnosis, and management [J]. Obstet Gynecol, 2006,107(6): 1373-1381.
  • 8Qian ZD, Guo QY, Huang LL. Identifying risk factors for recurrent cesarean scar pregnancy: a case-control study [J]. Fertil Steril, 2014,102( 1 ) : 129-134.
  • 9Naji O,Daemen A,Smith A,et al section scar influence the site Does the presence of a cesarean of placental implantation and subsequent migration in future pregnancies: a prospective case- control study[J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gyneeol, 2012,40 ( 5 ) : 557-561.
  • 10Bulletti C, de Ziegler D. Uterine contractility and embryo implantation[J]. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol, 2005,17(3 ) : 265-276.

共引文献166

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部