期刊文献+

磺达肝葵钠干预前后急性冠脉综合症患者内皮细胞及凝血功能的变化分析

原文传递
导出
摘要 目的分析磺达肝葵钠干预前后急性冠脉综合症(ACS)患者内皮细胞及凝血功能的变化。方法选取2010年11月至2013年11月ACS患者88例,抽签随机分为观察组和对照组,每组44例。对观察组患者给予磺达肝葵钠干预治疗,对照组给予低分子肝素治疗,比较两组患者的临床疗效、血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)、血浆血管内皮素-1(ET-1)表达水平和不良反应发生率,分析观察组给予磺达肝葵钠治疗前后凝血功能包括血小板计数(PLT)、凝血酶原时间(PT)、部分凝血活酶时间(APTT)的变化。结果两组患者临疗效无统计学意义(P>0.05),观察组VEGF和ET-1分别为(102.39±28.97)μg/L、(148.96±7.05)pg/m L与对照组(124.08±24.86)μg/L、(122.86±6.12)pg/m L比较差异显著(P<0.05),观察组不良反应率2.27%与对照组15.91比较显著较低(P<0.05),观察组磺达肝葵钠干预前PLT、PT、APTT分别为(56.94±20.42)×109/L、(19.64±2.67)s、(42.67±5.16)s与干预24 h后(69.16±22.16)×109/L、(17.04±2.16)s、(40.08±4.19)s比较差异显著(P<0.05)。结论磺达肝葵钠干预ACS患者血管内皮细胞功能恢复更快,治疗后不良反应率降低,凝血功能快速恢复正常,临床上有应用推广价值。
作者 陈兰涛
出处 《医药论坛杂志》 2016年第7期168-169,共2页 Journal of Medical Forum
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献44

  • 1韩江莉,毛节明,任川,梁瀛,孙丽娜,梅林,王佳宁,张福春,郭丽君,高炜.对急性冠脉综合征有独立预测价值的临床症状[J].中国误诊学杂志,2006,6(3):399-401. 被引量:7
  • 2柯元南.急性冠状动脉综合征诊断和治疗进展[J].中华老年心脑血管病杂志,2006,8(1):2-4. 被引量:23
  • 3Task Force for Diagnosis and Treatment of Non-ST-SegmentElevation Acute Coronary Syndromes of European Society ofCardiology, Bassand JP, Hamm CW, et al. Guidelines for thediagnosis and treatment of non-ST-segment elevation acute coronarysyndromes [ J]. Eur Heart J,2007,28( 13) : 1598-1660.
  • 4Murphy SA,Gibson CM,Morrow DA,et al. Efficacy and safety ofthe low-molecular weight heparin enoxaparin compared withunfractionated heparin across the acute coronary syndromespectrum: a meta-analysis [ J]. Eur Heart J,2007,28( 17) :2077-2086.
  • 5Vande Werf F, Bax J, Betriu A, et al. Management of acutemyocardial infarction in patients presenting with persistent ST-segment elevation : the Task Force on the Management of ST-Segment Elevation Acute Myocardial Infarction of the EuropeanSociety of Cardiology [J]. Eur Heart J,2008,29(23) :2909-2945.
  • 6Samama MM,Gerotziafas GT. Evaluation of the pharmacologicalproperties and clinical results of the synthetic pentasaccharide(fondaparinux) [ J]. Thromb Res,2003 ,109( 1) :1-11.
  • 7FifthOrganization to Assess Strategies in Acute Ischemic SyndromesInvestigators,Yusuf S, Mehta SR,et al. Comparison of fondaparinuxand enoxaparin in acute coronary syndromes [J]. N Engl J Med,2006,354(14) :1464-1476.
  • 8Hirsh J,Guyatt G,Albers GW,et al. Executive summary:American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based ClinicalPractice Guidelines ( 8th Edition ) [J]. Chest, 2008, 133 (6Suppl) :71S-109S.
  • 9Ferguson JJ, Califf RM, Antman EM, et al. Enoxaparin vsunfractionated heparin in high-risk patients with non-ST-segmentelevation acute coronary syndromes managed with an intended earlyinvasive strategy : primary results of the SYNERGY randomizedtrial [J]. JAMA,2004,292(1) :45-54.
  • 10Anderson JA, Hirsh J, Yusuf S, et al. Comparison of theanticoagulant intensities of fondaparinux and enoxaparin in theOrganization to Assess Strategies in Acute Ischemic Syndromes(OASIS)-5 tria[J]. J Thromb Haemost,2010,8:243-249.

共引文献33

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部