期刊文献+

不对称信息下代理成本对供应链外包策略的影响分析 被引量:3

Impact of Agency Costs on Outsourcing Strategy in Supply Chain with Asymmetric Information
下载PDF
导出
摘要 针对不对称信息下代理成本对外包策略的影响,以一个简单二级供应链为研究对象,运用委托代理理论,分别建立制造商和销售商主导激励模型。研究结果表明:当销售努力为不对称信息时,制造商希望聘请销售商来完成销售任务,此时销售商最优的努力水平a*和利润分享比例β*均向下发生了扭曲;而当制造成本为不对称信息且边际收益不低于边际风险成本时,只有在特殊情况下(单位制造成本c很低时),销售商才会愿意自己进行生产,否则其也乐意委托制造商完成分包任务,此时尽管销售商的最优努力水平a**向下发生扭曲,但为了调动制造商的生产积极性,最优的利润分享比例β**向上发生扭曲。最后,通过数值例子证明了结论的有效性。 To analyze the effect of agency costs caused by asymmetric information on outsourcing strategy, this paper established the manufacturer-led and retailer-led incentives model based on the principal-agent theory. Results showed that, when sales effort was asymmetric information, the manufacturer tended to hire a retailer to complete the sales tasks. At this time, the optimal effort level a * of retailer and profit sharing ratio β * were downward distorted. While, when manufacturing cost c was asymmetric information and marginal revenue is not lower than the marginal risk cost, only in exceptional circumstances (unit manufacturing eostc was low), the retailer would be willing to manufacture by himself. Otherwise, it was willing to entrust the manufacturer for production. Then, although the downward distortion of retailer's best effort a ** occurred, the upward distortion of optimal profit-sharing ratio β ** had taken place, to mobilize the enthusiasm of the manufacturer's production. Finally, a numerical instance was given to validate the conclusions.
出处 《软科学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第9期123-130,共8页 Soft Science
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(71502037) 教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目(13YJC630053 14YJC630020)
关键词 二级供应链 不对称信息 外包策略 自营成本 代理成本 two-echelon supply chain asymmetric information outsourcing strategy proprietary costs agency costs
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1Uchiyama H.The Index of Agency Cost and the Financial Accelerator:The Case of Japan[J].Japan and the World Economy,2006,18(1):22-48.
  • 2Zhou M,Wang X.Agency Cost and the Crisis of China's SOE[J].China Economic Review,2000,11(3):297-317.
  • 3Belghitar Y,Clark E.Managerial Risk Incentives and Investment Related Agency Costs[J].International Review of Financial Analysis,2015,38:191-197.
  • 4Truong T T,Heaney R.The Determinants of Equity Agency Conflicts between Managers and Shareholders:Evidence from Australia[J].Journal of Multinational Financial Management,2013,23(4):314-326.
  • 5Jurkus A F,Park J C,Woodard L S.Women in Top Management and Agency Costs[J].Journal of Business Research,2011,64(2):180-186.
  • 6Leventis S,Weetman P,Caramanis C.Agency Costs and Product Market Competition:The Case of Audit Pricing in Greece[J].The British Accounting Review,2011,43(2):112-119.
  • 7Claus I.The Effects of Asymmetric Information between Borrowers and Lenders in an Open Economy[J].Journal of International Money and Finance,2011,30(5):796-816.
  • 8Lin H,Lin F,Hsiao T,et al.Fuzzy Set Theory in Managerial Contract Analyses[J].Expert Systems with Applications,2009,36(3):4535-4540.
  • 9肖继辉,孟婷.非对称业绩基准与高管薪酬:基于代理成本视角[J].管理评论,2015,27(1):194-208. 被引量:7
  • 10鲁芳,牛文举,罗定提.基于导游过度自信的激励机制设计与分析[J].数学的实践与认识,2014,44(5):101-106. 被引量:2

二级参考文献124

共引文献78

同被引文献32

引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部