期刊文献+

《梅村诗话》版本比较研究

Comparison Study of the Versions of Meicun Poetry Talks
下载PDF
导出
摘要 《梅村诗话》在流传过程中版本较多,各版本之间并非前人所说相差不大,而是谬误、遗漏之处甚多。今人所常见的《清诗话》版本并不是根据娄东杂著本刻印,而是根据观自得斋本刻印的。最精良的梅村家藏稿版本仍有不少需校勘之处。《梅村诗话》不仅在体例上延续了史家思想,而且也表现出既耿直又隐晦的诗学思想。 During the course of its inheriting circulation,there have been various versions of the book Meicun Poetry Talks. And contrary to the previous scholars' opinions that slight difference was among those versions,there have existed quite lots of errors and omissions in those versions. Our present commonly seen edition of Meicun Poetry Talks was not inscribed and printed according to Loudong's version of The Verified Works,but according to the version of Guanzide. However,the most splendid version of Meicun family collection draft still needs a lot of textual emendations. Meicun Poetry Talks not only inherited the historians' thoughts uniquely in style,but also demonstrated the straightness and obscurity of the poetic thought.
作者 石婷
出处 《洛阳理工学院学报(社会科学版)》 2016年第4期48-51,96,共5页 Journal of Luoyang Institute of Science and Technology:Social Science Edition
关键词 《梅村诗话》 版本 比较 Meicun Poetry Talks version comparison
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1李学颖.吴梅村全集[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,1990.
  • 2程穆衡.吴梅村诗集笺注[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,1983.
  • 3《续修四库全书》编纂委员会.续修四库全书·1697·集部[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,2013.
  • 4吴梅村.梅村诗话[M].观自得斋丛书,光绪二十年.
  • 5吴梅村.梅村诗话[M].上海:扫叶山房石印本,宣统三年.
  • 6《续修四库全书》编纂委员会.续修四库全书·1396·别集部[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,2013.
  • 7王夫之.清诗话:上册[M].北京:中华书局,1963.
  • 8邬国平.吴伟业《梅村诗话》考辨[J].古籍研究,2003(2):15-19. 被引量:3
  • 9邓之诚.清初纪事初编[M].上海:上海古籍出版社.2013.

共引文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部