期刊文献+

民用飞机安全性分析中单点失效MTBF的算法 被引量:1

Single failure MTBF analysis on aircraft safety assessment
下载PDF
导出
摘要 安全是民航工业的生命线。按照适航规章要求,任何妨碍飞机继续安全飞行与着陆的单点失效的出现是极不可能的。传统的参数,如平均故障间隔时间(MTBF),是用来计算部件失效概率的常用参数,但由于关键安全部件可能在平均故障间隔时间之前出现故障,因此,该参数的传统计算方法对于单点失效概率的分析并不适用。提出评价单点失效概率的分析方法,即基于所给出数据样本量的大小,提出了评价单点失效概率的计算公式。给出了两个案例来进一步验证所提方法的有效性。 Safety is the lifeline of civil aviation industry. The regulations proposed by airworthiness authorities require that the occurrence of any single failure which would prevent continuous safe flight and landing of airplanes is extremely improbable. While the ambiguous description makes it difficult to calculate the occurrence of single failure in practice. The traditional parameter, mean time between failure(MTBF), is not suitable for single failure analysis due to the possibility that critical safety components may fail before MTBF. A method is proposed to e- valuate the probability of single failure. The evaluating formula for the occurrence probability of single failure basing on sample size is given. Practical cases are used to verify the effectiveness of this method.
作者 杨可 赵长啸
出处 《中国民航大学学报》 CAS 2016年第4期11-15,共5页 Journal of Civil Aviation University of China
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(U1533105)
关键词 单点失效 MTBF 概率 安全性评估 single failure MTBF probability safety assessment
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1HEWITF J, PHAM J. Quantitative Risk Assessment Enhances Customer Trust in Aviation[C]//Reliability and Maintainability Symposium (RAMS), 2014 Annual. IEEE, 2014: 1-6.
  • 2ZHU Y, ZHANG J, GONG Q, et al. Reliability and Safety Assessment with AltaRica for Complex Aircraft Systems[C]//Reliability, Maintain- ability and Safety(ICRMS), 2011 9th International Conference on. IEEE, 2011 : 588-593.
  • 3YANG J, HUANG H Z, HE L P, et al. Risk evaluation in failure mode and effects analysis of aircraft turbine rotor blades using Dempster- Shafer evidence theory under uncertainty[J]. Engineering Failure Ana- lysis, 2011, 18(8): 2084-2092.
  • 4LIU C B. Aircraft Fuel Tank System Fire Disaster Analysis based on FMEA and FTA[C]//QR2MSE 2013, IEEE Computer Society, IEEE, 2013.
  • 5MYERS ALBERT, RAUZY ANTOINE. Efficient reliability assessment of redundant systems subject to imperfect fault coverage using binary decision diagrams[J]. IEEE Transactions on Reliability, 2008, 57(2): 336-348.
  • 6KERLUND O, BIEBER P, BOEDE E, et al. ISAAC, a Framework for Integrated Safety Analysis of Functional[C]//Geometrical and Human Aspects, in 3rd European Congress on Embedded Real Time Systems (ERTS). Toulouse, France, 2006.
  • 7LISAGOR O. A Pragmatic Approach[D]. York: The University of York, 2010.
  • 8ZHAO Changxiao CHEN Yao WANG Hailiang XIONG Huagang.Reliability Analysis of Aircraft Condition Monitoring Network Using an Enhanced BDD Algorithm[J].Chinese Journal of Aeronautics,2012,25(6):925-930. 被引量:4
  • 9FAA. Arsenal Version of AC1309(draft), System Design and Analysis [S]. America: Federal Aviation Administration, 2002.
  • 10YUN W Y, PARK GOEUN, HAN Y J. An optimal reliability and main- tainability design of a searching system[J]. Communications in Statis- tics: Simulation and Computation, 2014, 43(8):1959-1978.

二级参考文献1

共引文献3

同被引文献11

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部