期刊文献+

Ranking Quality Management Indicators for Radio Programs

Ranking Quality Management Indicators for Radio Programs
下载PDF
导出
摘要 Even though radio broadcasting is one of the most widespread electronic mass media, its management for survival is getting drastic. The competition among incumbent radio stations becomes challenging due to the market change and environmental evolution. Managing program quality is a critical issue to a radio station to sharpen its competitive advantages. Quality management of radio programs is intertwined with complicated factors. In order to identify the primary factors affecting radio program quality as well as explore the impact level these factors bring, this study adopts modified Delphi method and analytic hierarchy process (AHP) to explore the issues. According to the outcomes modified Delphi method, the factors were categorized into four dimensions: operation, coordination, structure, and improvement. Ten sub-dimensions were followed. Each sub-dimension includes six to nineteen indicators for measuring radio program quality. In total, 72 indicators were identified. The AHP result revealed that the most important weight was given to the operation dimension. On the contrary, the least important weight was placed on the improvement dimension. Among the sub-dimensions, the standard procedure and organizational design were rated more important than the rest. The results could provide some facts to radio managers for future management.
作者 Chia-Kun Lee Chia-Kun Lee(I-Shou University, Kaohsiung City, Taiwan, R.O.C.)
机构地区 I-Shou University
出处 《Journalism and Mass Communication》 2016年第7期389-396,共8页 新闻与大众传媒(英文版)
关键词 quality RADIO INDICATORS DELPHI AHP 无线电广播 管理指标 程序质量 广播节目 层次分析法 无线电台 竞争优势 节目质量
  • 相关文献

参考文献24

  • 1Albarran, A. (2013). Management of electronic media. Wadsworth.
  • 2Bhushan, N., & Ria, K. (2004). Strategic decision making: Applying the analytic hierarchy process. London: Springer-Verlag London Limited.
  • 3Crosby, P. B. (1979). Quality is free: The art of making quality certain. New York: New Amer-ican Library.
  • 4Daryani, S. M., Ali, S., & Asli-zadeh, A. (2012). Organizational theory, systemic thinking and system management. International Journal of Organizational Leadership, 1(2), 71-79.
  • 5Dean, J. W., & Bowcn, D. E. (1994). Management theory and total quality: Improving research and practice through theory development. Academy of Management Review, 19(3), 392-418.
  • 6Delbecq, A. L., Van de Ven, A. H., & Gustafson, D. H. (1975). Group techniques for program planning: A guide to nominal group and Delphi processes. Chicago: Scott, Foresman and Company.
  • 7Deming, W. E. (1986). Out of the crisis. Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.
  • 8Garvin, D. A. (1984). What does product quality really mean? Sloan Management Review, 26(1), 25-43.
  • 9Herrick, D. F. (2012). Media management in the age of giants: Business dynamics of journalism (2nd ed.). Iowa: University of New Mexico Press.
  • 10Hoeg, W., & Lauterbach, T. (2004). Digital audio broadcasting: Principles and applications of digital radio. John Wiley & Sons. Jackson, M. (2003). Systems thinking: Creative holismfor managers. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部