也谈“NL+V+着+NM”结构的变换

On Structure Transform of“NL+V+ +NM”

文章对"NL+V+着+NM"结构的变换提出了与以往不同的观点。首先,表动作进行的"NL+V+着+NM"结构(文章称为A式)可以变换为NL+正在+V+NM;表静态存在的"NL+V+着+NM"结构(文章称为B式),可变换为NM+V+在+NL;表状态的持续的"NL+V+着+NM"结构(文章称为C式)可变换为NL+的+NM+V+着。其次对三者变换不同的原因试图进行解释,认为A式与C式变换方式不同的原因在于二者中的动词是否具有[+持续]的语义特征。另外文章借鉴了前人的研究成果,从动词的语义特征和汉语史中"着"的语法化两个角度解释了A式与B式变换不同的原因。最后文章从动词与宾语的语义特征的角度试图解释B式与C式变换不同的原因。

In this paper, the transformation of the structure of ＂NL＋V＋ ＋NM＂is proposed in this paper.First, the table moves to ＂NL ＋V ＋ ＋NM＂structure（the A type） can transform into ＋V ＋NM NL ＋; static existence＂NL＋V＋ a ＋NM＂structure（the B type）, transform into NM＋V＋ in ＋NL; state table continued＂NL＋V＋ a ＋NM structure（the C type） can transform into NL＋ ＋NM＋V＋. Second, try to explain the different reasons of three transformations. The reason that A type and C type are different is whether the two verbs in the semantic features of [＋] continued. In addition, the paper uses the previous research results, from the semantic features of verbs and Chinese history of ＂two＂to explain the A style and B style transformation of different reasons. Finally, from the point of view of the semantic features of verbs and objects, this paper tries to explain the reasons for the difference between B and C.