期刊文献+

声触诊组织量化技术在乳腺肿块定性诊断中的价值 被引量:4

Diagnostic value of virtual touch tissue quantification in the differential diagnosis of breast tumors
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨声触诊组织量化(VTQ)技术在乳腺肿块良恶性鉴别诊断中的应用价值。方法应用VTQ技术对102例共107个乳腺肿块内部、肿块边缘及周围乳腺组织行剪切波速度(SWV)测量,分别记为SWVi、SWVb、SWVg。以病理结果为标准,比较乳腺良性组与恶性组SWV差异,绘制ROC曲线确定判断乳腺病灶良恶性的最佳界值。结果所有肿块的SWVi值明显高于SWVb和SWVg,SWVb值明显高于SWVg,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.01)。乳腺恶性组SWVi、SWVb分别为(6.70±1.75)、(4.58±1.38)m/s,良性组分别为(3.52±1.52)、(2.80±0.97)m/s,两组参数恶性组均高于良性组(P<0.01)。以SWVi值5.06m/s为界值诊断乳腺肿块良恶性的敏感性为83.7%、特异性为85.9%;以SWVb值3.51m/s为界值诊断肿块良恶性的敏感性为79.1%、特异性为81.2%。结论乳腺肿块内部与肿块边缘的SWV均有助于乳腺肿块良恶性的鉴别诊断。 Objective To explore the diagnostic value of virtual touch tissue quantification (VTQ) in the differential diagnosis of breast masses. Methods A total of 102 patients with 107 breast masses were examined by means of VTQ technique. The shear wave velocity (SWV) was measured within the lesion (SWVi), in the boundary zone (SWVb) and in the normal glandular tissues (SWVg). With results of pathological diagnosis as the gold standard, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to evaluate the diagnostic value of VTQ and to find the optimal cut-off point in differentiating malignant from benign lesions. Results The SWVi was higher than SWVb and SWVg, and SWVb was higher than SWVg in both malignant and benign groups ( P 〈 0.05 ). The SWVi and SWVb were ( 6.70 -+ 1.75 ) and (4.58 _+ 1.38) m/s, respectively in malignant lesions, and were (3.52 _+ 1.52) and (2.80 ±0.97 ) m/s respectively in benign lesions, with significant differences between benign and malignant lesions (P 〈 0.01 ). When the cutoff point of SWVi was determined as 5.06 m/s, the sensitivity was 83.7% and the specificity was 85.9%. When the cut-off point of SWVb was determined as 3.51 m/s, the sensitivity was 79. 1% and the specificity was 81.2%. Conclusion The SWVi and SWVb can help the differential diagnosis of breast tumors.
出处 《山东大学学报(医学版)》 CAS 北大核心 2016年第9期48-52,共5页 Journal of Shandong University:Health Sciences
关键词 超声检查 声触诊组织量化 乳腺疾病 诊断 鉴别 Ultrasonography Virtual touch tissue quantification Breast diseases Diagnosis differentiation
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1Fitzmaurice C, Dicker D, Pain A, et al. The global burden of cancer 2013[J]. JAMA oncology, 2015, 1(4):505-527.
  • 2黄哲宙,陈万青,吴春晓,郑荣寿,陈建国,杨念念,王宁,张思维,郑莹.中国女性乳腺癌的发病和死亡现况——全国32个肿瘤登记点2003—2007年资料分析报告[J].肿瘤,2012,32(6):435-439. 被引量:369
  • 3Kim EK, Ko KH, Oh KK, et al. Clinical application of the BI-RADS final assessment to breast sonography in conjunction with mammography[J]. Am J Roentgenol, 2008, 190(5):1209-1215.
  • 4Hooley RJ, Scoutt LM, Philpotts LE. Breast ultrasonography: state of the art [J]. Radiology, 2013, 268(3):642-659.
  • 5Balleyguier C, Ciolovan L, Ammari S, et al. Breast elastography: the technical process and its applications[J]. Diagn Interv Imaging, 2013, 94(5):503-513.
  • 6肖静,李杰,时丹丹,王蒙,张开宁,李海英,周炜.超声弹性成像面积比与Itoh评分法在乳腺病变诊断中的比较[J].山东大学学报(医学版),2011,49(6):149-151. 被引量:10
  • 7XIAO Jing, LI Jie, SHI Dandan, et al. Comparison of values of the area ratio and the Itoh scoring system with sonoelastography in the diagnosis of breast lesions [J]. Journal of Shandong University(Health Sciences), 2011, 49(6):149-151.
  • 8Zhi H, Ou B, Lou BM, et al. Comparison of ultrasound elastography, mammography, and sonography in the diagnosis of solid breast lesions[J]. J Ultrasound Med, 2007, 26(6):807-815.
  • 9Athanasiou A, Tardivon A, Tanter M, et al. Breast lesions: quantitative elastography with supersonic shear imaging—preliminary results [J]. Radiology, 2010, 256(1):297-303.
  • 10Meng W, Zhang G, Wu C, et al. Preliminary results of acoustic radiation force impulse(ARFI)ultrasound imaging of breast lesions[J]. Ultrasound Med Biol, 2011, 37(9): 1436-1443.

二级参考文献29

  • 1杨玲,李连弟,陈育德,D.M.Parkin.中国乳腺癌发病死亡趋势的估计与预测[J].中华肿瘤杂志,2006,28(6):438-440. 被引量:278
  • 2全国肿瘤防治研究办公室,全国肿瘤登记中心,卫生部疾病预防控制局.中国肿瘤死亡报告-全国第三次死因回顾抽样调查[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2010,6.
  • 3Zhi H, Ou B, Luo B M, et al. Comparison of ultrasound elastography, mammography, and sonography in the di- agnosis of solid breast lesions [ J ]. J Ultrasound Med, 2007, 26(6) :807-815.
  • 4Itoh A, Ueno E, Tohno E, et al. Breast disease: clinical application of US elastography for diagnosis[ J]. Radiolo- gy, 2006, 239(2) :341-350.
  • 5Leong L C, Sire L S, Lee Y S, et al. A prospective stud- y to compare the diagnostic performance of breast elastog- raphy versus conventional breast ultrasound[ J ]. Clin Ra- diol, 2010, 65(11) :887-94.
  • 6Krouskop T A, Wheeler T M, Kallel F, et al. Elastic moduli of breast and prostate tissues under compression [J]. Ultrason Imaging, 1998, 20(4) :260-274.
  • 7Garra B S, Cespedes E I, Ohir J, et al. Elastography of breast lesions: initial results [ J]. Radiology, 1997, 202 ( 1 ) :79-86.
  • 8Greenleaf JF,Fatemi M, Insana M. Selected methods for imaging elastic properties of biological tissues. Annu Rev Biomed Eng, 2003,5:57 -78.
  • 9Zhi H, Ou B, Luo BM, et al. Comparison of ultrasound elastography,mammography, and sonography in the diagnosis of solid breast lesions. J Ultrasound Med, 2007,26 : 807-815.
  • 10Ophir J, Cespedes 1, Ponnekanti H, et al. Elastography: a quantitative method for imaging the elasticity of biological tissues. Ultrasonic Imaging, 1991, l 3 : 111-134.

共引文献435

同被引文献29

引证文献4

二级引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部