期刊文献+

Pore Structure Characteristics and Permeability of Deep Sedimentary Rocks Determined by Mercury Intrusion Porosimetry 被引量:9

Pore Structure Characteristics and Permeability of Deep Sedimentary Rocks Determined by Mercury Intrusion Porosimetry
原文传递
导出
摘要 Pore structure characteristics of rock are a great concern for researchers and practitioners in rock mechanics and rock engineering fields. In this study, mercury intrusion porosimetry(MIP) was used to measure pore size distribution, as well as several important index parameters of pore structure, for seven common types of deep sedimentary rocks with a total of fifty rock samples. Results show a similar pore size distribution pattern of the rock samples in the same lithological group, but remarkable differences among different lithological groups. Among seven investigated rock types, mudstone has the smallest porosity of 3.37%, while conglomerate has the largest value of 18.8%. It is also found that the porosity of rock types with finer grain size is lower than those with coarser grain size. Meanwhile, a comparison of frequency distribution at ten intervals of pore-throat diameter among seven types of sedimentary rocks reveals that different rock types have different dominant pore-size ranges. Furthermore, permeability of the investigated sedimentary rock samples was derived based on MIP data using reported theoretical equations. Among seven rock types, mudstone has the lowest averaged permeability(3.64×10^(-6) mD) while conglomerate has the highest one(8.59×10^(-4) mD). From mudstone to conglomerate, rock permeability increases with an increase of grain size, with only an exception of siltstone which has a relatively larger porosity value. Finally, regression analysis show that there is a good fitting(R^2=0.95) between permeability and porosity which could be easily used to derive reliable permeability values of similar kinds of engineering rocks. Pore structure characteristics of rock are a great concern for researchers and practitioners in rock mechanics and rock engineering fields. In this study, mercury intrusion porosimetry(MIP) was used to measure pore size distribution, as well as several important index parameters of pore structure, for seven common types of deep sedimentary rocks with a total of fifty rock samples. Results show a similar pore size distribution pattern of the rock samples in the same lithological group, but remarkable differences among different lithological groups. Among seven investigated rock types, mudstone has the smallest porosity of 3.37%, while conglomerate has the largest value of 18.8%. It is also found that the porosity of rock types with finer grain size is lower than those with coarser grain size. Meanwhile, a comparison of frequency distribution at ten intervals of pore-throat diameter among seven types of sedimentary rocks reveals that different rock types have different dominant pore-size ranges. Furthermore, permeability of the investigated sedimentary rock samples was derived based on MIP data using reported theoretical equations. Among seven rock types, mudstone has the lowest averaged permeability(3.64×10^(-6) mD) while conglomerate has the highest one(8.59×10^(-4) mD). From mudstone to conglomerate, rock permeability increases with an increase of grain size, with only an exception of siltstone which has a relatively larger porosity value. Finally, regression analysis show that there is a good fitting(R^2=0.95) between permeability and porosity which could be easily used to derive reliable permeability values of similar kinds of engineering rocks.
出处 《Journal of Earth Science》 SCIE CAS CSCD 2016年第4期670-676,共7页 地球科学学刊(英文版)
基金 supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China(Nos.41502264,51134005) the Specialized Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education of China(No.20130023120016) the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of China(No.2010QL07)
关键词 sedimentary rock pore structure mercury intrusion porosimetry (MIP) pore size dis-tribution POROSITY permeability. sedimentary rock, pore structure, mercury intrusion porosimetry (MIP), pore size dis-tribution, porosity, permeability.
  • 相关文献

参考文献21

  • 1A1-Harthi, A. A., AI-Amri, R. M., Shehata, W. M., 1999. The Porosity and Engineering Properties of Vesicular Basalt in Saudi Arabia. Engineering Geology, 54(3/4): 313-320. doi:10.1016/s0013-7952(99)00050-2.
  • 2Clavaud, J. B., Maineult, A., Zamora, M., et al., 2008. Perme- ability Anisotropy and Its Relations with Porous Medium Structure. Journal of Geophysical Research, 113(B1): B01202. doi: 10.1029/2007jb005004.
  • 3Di Benedetto, C., Cappelletti, P., Favaro, M., et al., 2015. Po- rosity as Key Factor in the Durability of Two Historical Building Stones: Neapolitan Yellow Tuff and Vicenza Stone. Engineering Geology, 193: 310-319. doi: 10.1016/j .enggeo .2015.05.006.
  • 4Dong, T., Harris, N. B., Ayranci, K., et al., 2015. Porosity Characteristics of the Devonian Horn River Shale, Canada Insights from Lithofacies Classification and Shale Com- position. International Journal of Coal Geology, 141/142: 74-90. doi: 10.1016/j.coal.2015.03.001.
  • 5Erguler, Z. A., Ulusay, R., 2009. Water-Induced Variations in Mechanical Properties of Clay-Bearing Rocks. Interna- tional Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 46(2): 355-370. doi:10.1016/j.ijrmms.2008.07.002.
  • 6Gao, Z. Y., Hu, Q. H., 2013. Estimating Permeability Using Median Pore-Throat Radius Obtained fi'om Mercury Intru- sion Porosimetry. Journal of Geophysics and Engineering, 10(2): 025014. doi:10.1088/1742-2132/10/2/025014.
  • 7Giesche, H., 2006. Mercury Porosimetry: A General (Practical) Overview. Particle & Particle Systems Characterization, 23(1): 9-19. doi:10.1002/ppsc.200601009.
  • 8Hartmann, D. J., Beaumont, E. A., 2000. Predicting Reservoir System Quality and Performance. In: Beaumont, E. A., Foster, N. H., eds., Exploring for Oil and Gas Traps:AAPG Treatise of Petroleum Geology. Handbook of Pe- troleum Geology. 9-1-9-154.
  • 9Hudyma, N., Avar, B. B., Karakouzian, M., 2004. Compressive Strength and Failure Modes of Lithophysae-Rich Topopah Spring Tuff Specimens and Analog Models Containing Cavities. Engineering Geology, 73(1/2): 179-190. doi: 10.1016/j.enggeo.2004.01.003.
  • 10Katz, A. J., Thompson, A. H., 1986. Quantitative Prediction of Permeability in Porous Rock. Physical Review B, 34(11): 8179-8181. doi:10.1103/physrevb.34.8179.

同被引文献158

引证文献9

二级引证文献197

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部