期刊文献+

3T DW-MRI鉴别鼻腔鼻窦腺样囊性癌与嗅神经母细胞瘤的价值 被引量:5

Effectiveness of 3T diffusion-weighted MRI in differentiating sinonasal adenoid cystic carcinomas and olfactory neuroblastomas
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:评价3TDW-MRI对鼻腔鼻窦腺样囊性癌(ACCs)和嗅神经母细胞瘤(ONBs)的鉴别诊断价值。方法:经病理证实的20例ACCs患者和15例ONBs患者均行3.0TDW-MRI扫描,采用周期性旋转重叠平行采集和增强后处理重建(Duo PROPELLER)加脂肪抑制技术,两组b值(b=0,700和b=0,1000s/mm2)。采用独立样本t检验比较ACCs与ONBs的ADC值的差异,并通过ROC曲线分析获得ADC值的诊断效能。结果:鼻腔鼻窦ONBs的ADCb(0,700)=(1.132±0.269)×10-3 mm2/s、ADCb(0,1000)=(0.927±0.222)×10-3 mm2/s,ACCs的ADCb(0,700)=(1.531±0.338)×10-3 mm2/s、ADCb(0,1000)=(1.340±0.331)×10-3 mm2/s,鼻腔鼻窦ACCs的ADC值显著高于ONBs(P=0.000)。以ADCb(0,700)=1.106×10-3 mm2/s为临界值,鉴别两类肿瘤的敏感度、特异度、阳性预测值、阴性预测值及符合率分别为90.5%、66.7%、73.3%、87.5%和78.6%;以ADCb(0,1000)=0.936×10-3 mm2/s为临界值,鉴别两类肿瘤的敏感度、特异度、阳性预测值、阴性预测值及符合率分别为95.2%、66.7%、74.1%、93.3%、81.0%。ADCb(0,700)和ADCb(0,1000)对两类肿瘤的鉴别诊断效能的差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:DW-MRI可以对鼻腔鼻窦腺样囊性癌与嗅神经母细胞瘤进行定量分析,能有效提高对这两类肿瘤的鉴别诊断准确性。 Objective:To assess the value of 3T diffusion-weighted MRI (DW-MRI) in differentiating adenoid cystic carcinomas (ACCs) from olfactory neuroblastomas (ONBs) of sinonasal tract, Methods: Periodically rotated overlapping parallel lines with enhanced reconstruction (PROPELLER) DUO DW-MRI with fat suppression technique at 3T MR scan- ner was performed in 20 patients with sinonasaI ACCs and 15 patients with ONBs. All the cases were confirmed histologi- cally. Apparent diffusion coefficients (ADCs) were obtained with two sets of b-values (b=0 and 700s/mm^2, b--0 and 1000s/mm^2 ). Difference in ADCs between sinonasal ACCs and ONBs was analyzed using 2-independent samples t-test. Di agnostic efficacy of ADCs for discriminating between the two diseases was evaluated and compared using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. Results:The ADCb(0,700) and ADCb(0,1000) of sinonasal ONBs were (1. 132± 0. 269) × 10 ^-3and (0. 927±0. 222)× 10^-3mm^2/s,and those of ACCs were (1. 531 ±0. 338)× 10^-3 and (1. 340± 0. 331)× 10^-3mm^2/s, the ADCs of ACCs were higher than those of ONBs with significantly statistical difference (P= 0. 000). Using ADCb(0,700) value of 1. 106 × 10 a mm^2/s as the threshold value, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy for differentiating sinonasal ONBs and ACCs were 90.5% ,66.7% ,73.3% ,87.5% and 78.6%,respectively. Setting ADCb(0,1000) value of 0. 936 ×10^-3mm^2/s as the threshold value, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy for differentiating sinonasal ONBs and ACCs was 95. 2%, 66.7 %, 74. 1%, 93.3% and 81.0% ,respectively. There was no significant difference in diagnostic efficacy between the two b-values settings (P〉 0.05). Conclusion: PROPELLER Duo DW-MRI can make quantitative analysis on sinonasal adenoid cystic carcinomas (ACCs) and olfactory neuroblastomas (ONBs),thus can effectively improve the accuracy of differential diagnosis.
出处 《放射学实践》 北大核心 2016年第8期681-684,共4页 Radiologic Practice
基金 国家自然科学基金(81571649) 北京市卫生系统高层次卫生技术人才学科带头人项目(2014-2-005) 北京市百千万人才工程(2014001)
关键词 鼻腔 鼻窦 腺样囊性癌 嗅神经母细胞 磁共振成像 扩散加权成像 表观扩散系数 Nasal cavity Paranasal sinus Adenoid cystic carcinomas Olfactory neuroblastomas Magnetic reso-nance imaging Diffusion-weighted imaging~ Apparent diffusion coefficient
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

  • 1Bhattacharyya N. Cancer of the nasal cavity: survival and facto influencing prognosis[J]. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2002,128(9) : 1079-1083.
  • 2Lupinetti AD, Roberts DB, Williams MD, et al. Sinonasal adenoid cystic carcinoma: the M. D. anderson cancer center experience [J]. Cancer, 2007,110(12) : 2726 -2731.
  • 3陈晓丽,杨本涛,王振常.鼻、眶及耳部腺样囊性癌CT和MRI表现[J].当代医学,2009,15(20):115-117. 被引量:4
  • 4毛永征,王振常,杨本涛,鲜军舫,常青林,燕飞,刘中林.嗅神经母细胞瘤的CT和MRI表现[J].临床放射学杂志,2007,26(3):251-254. 被引量:10
  • 5Verhappen MH, Pouwels PJ, Ljumanovie R, et al. Diffusion- weighted MR imaging in head and neck cancer comparison be- tween half-fourier acquired single shot turbo spin echo and EPI techniques[J]. AJNR,2012,33(7) :1239-1246.
  • 6Razek AA,Sieza S,Maha B. Assessment of nasal and paranasal si- nus masses by diffusion-weighted MR imaging[J]. J Neuroradiol, 2009,36(4) : 206-211.
  • 7Chen X, Xian J, Wang X, et al. Role of periodically rotated over- lapping parallel lines with enhanced reconstruction diffusion- weighted imaging in correcting distortion and evaluating head andneck masses using 3T MRI[J]. Clin Radiol, 2014, 69 (4) : 403 -409.
  • 8Juan CJ, Chang HC, Hsueh CJ, et al. Salivary glands & echo-planar versus PROPELLER diffusion-weighted MR imaging for assess- ment of ADCs[J]. Radiology,2009,253(1) :144-152.
  • 9Pipe JG, Farthing VG, Forbes KP. Multishot diffusion-weighted FSE using PROPELLER MRI[J]. Magn Reson Med, 2002, 47 (1) ,42-52.
  • 10Thoeny HC, De Keyzer F, King AD. Diffusion-weighted MR ima- ging in the head and neek[J]. Radiology, 2012,263(1) : 19-32.

二级参考文献61

  • 1刘红刚,张盛忠,何春燕.嗅神经母细胞瘤的病理形态特点及其诊断和鉴别诊断[J].中华病理学杂志,2003,32(5):432-436. 被引量:39
  • 2杨智云,钟运其,张翎,蒋爱云,赵如恩,许达生.嗅神经母细胞瘤的CT和MRI表现[J].中华放射学杂志,2005,39(3):244-247. 被引量:29
  • 3张文华,张玉庚.鼻腔鼻窦腺样囊性癌临床与病理分析[J].武警医学院学报,2007,16(3):285-287. 被引量:4
  • 4张淑慧,王振常,鲜军舫,付琳.泪腺腺样囊性癌的CT和MRI诊断[J].中国医学影像技术,2007,23(4):507-509. 被引量:8
  • 5Compagno J, Wong RT. Intranasal mixed tumors (pleomorphic adenomas): a clinicopathologic study of 40 cases [J]. Am J Clin Pathol, 1977, 68(2): 213- 218.
  • 6Barnes L, Eveson JW, Reichart P, et al. World Health Organization classification of tumors. Pathology and genetics of head and neck tumors[J], Lyon:IARC Press, 2005. 10.
  • 7van der Wal JE, S.ow GB, van der Waal I. Histological reclassification of 101 intraoral salivary gland tumours (new WHO classification) [J]. J Clin Pathol, 1992, 45(9) : 834 - 835.
  • 8Isacssan G, Shear M. Intraoral salivary gland tumors: a retrospective study of 201 cases[J]. J Oral Pathol, 1983, 12(1): 57-62.
  • 9Rivera-Bastidas H,Ocanto RA. Acevedo AM. Intraoral minor salivary gland tumors: a retrospective study of 62 cases in a Venezuelan population[J]. J Oral Pathol Meal, 1996, 25(1): 1 -4.
  • 10van Heerden WF, Raubenheumer EJ. lntraoral salivary gland neoplasms: a retro-spective study of seventy cases in an African population[J]. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol, 1991, 71(5): 579 - 582.

共引文献27

同被引文献44

引证文献5

二级引证文献19

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部