期刊文献+

水资源管理中的公众参与制度研究 被引量:4

下载PDF
导出
摘要 水资源管理中,国际性和区域性相关的法律文书为公众在涉及与水有关的项目和政策方面提供了参与机制。公共参与权的宽广以及参与的程序性规定对水法制度、相关立法以及政治产生了重要影响。参与机制的有效实施、法律与制度之间的相互影响以及人对政策决定的影响反过来影响着公众参与机制。我国水资源管理中的公众参与制度发展显著,部分法律法规已纳入公共参与制度,但因实体法的不完善和程序法的缺失,公共参与制度并未得到有效施行。因此,亟需吸收国际和国外水资源管理公共参与的立法与实践经验,完善我国水资源管理中的公共参与制度。
作者 孙海涛
机构地区 河海大学法学院
出处 《理论月刊》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第9期104-110,共7页 Theory Monthly
基金 国家社科基金项目(15CFX010) 江苏省社会科学重点项目(14FXB004) 河海大学廉政研究中心资助课题(2015B07314)
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1Spyke, N. P. Public participation ' in environmental decision -making at the new millennium: Structuring new spheres of public influence [J]. Boston College Environmental Affairs Law Review, 1999,26:263 - 313.
  • 2Wood, C. Environmental impact assessment in developing countries [J]. International Development Planning Review, 2003,25".301 - 321.
  • 3Steffek, J., Kissling, C., & Nanz, P. (Eds.). Civil society participation in European and global governance: A cure for the democratic deficit? [M].Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007.
  • 4Razzaque, J. Trading watel. The human factor [J ].Review of European Community and International Environmental Law, 2004b,13:15- 26.
  • 5Bruch, C., Jansky, L., Nakayama, M., & Salewic, K. A. (Eds.). Public participation in the governance of international freshwater resources [M]. Tokyo: United Nations University Press, 2005, 121-176.
  • 6Joseph W. Dellapenna, Joyeeta Gupta, The Evolution of the Law and Politics of Water [M]. springer inc., 2008:353-372.
  • 7Fitzmaurice, M. Public participation in the North American agreement on environmental cooperation [J].International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 52, 2003:333 - 368.
  • 8Bruch, C., Jansky, L, Nakayama, M., & Salewic, K. A. (Eds.). Public participation in the governance of international freshwater resources [M]. Tokyo: United Nations University Press, 2005,101-122.
  • 9应松年.行政法与行政诉讼法[M].北京:中国法制出版社,2009.49.
  • 10孙海涛,赵国栋.印度环境公益诉讼制度评析及启示[J].河海大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2016,18(1):77-82. 被引量:10

二级参考文献19

  • 1吴卫星.印度环境公益诉讼制度及其启示[J].华东政法大学学报,2010,13(5):66-74. 被引量:27
  • 2MICHAEL G F, RAJA A V. Effectiveness ofenvironmental public interest litigation in India:determining the key variables [J]. Fordham EnvironmentalLaw Review, 2010(21):101-130.
  • 3SATHE S P. Judicial activism: the Indian experience [J].Washington University Journal of Low & Policy, 2001, 29(6): 84-87.
  • 4CUNNINGHAM C. Public interest litigation in the supremecourt of India: a study in light of American experience[J]. Journal of Indian Law Institute, 1987(29):494-521.
  • 5SHYAM D, ARIMIN R. Environmental law and policy inInida: cases, materials and statues [M]. New Delhi:Oxford University Press, 2001:136-220.
  • 6DAM S. Green laws for better health: the past that was andthe future that maybe.reflections from the Indianexperience [J]. Georgetown International EnvironmentalLaw Review, 2003.2004(16):593-615.
  • 7MICHAEL R A, ANEES A. Assessing environmentaldamage under Indian law [J]. Review of EuropenCommunity & International Environmental Law, 1996, 5(5):335-341.
  • 8VENKAT I. The supreme court of India, in judicialactivism in common law supreme courts [M]. Oxford:Oxford University Press, 2008:121-168.
  • 9AYESHA D. Environmental law, policy and practice inIndia[J]. Environmental Lialility, 1994, 86(2):88.89.
  • 10LAVANYA R. Public interest environmental litigation inIndia: exploring issues of access, participation, equity,effectiveness and sustainability [J]. Jounal ofEnvironmental Law, 2007, 19(3):293-321.

共引文献17

同被引文献50

引证文献4

二级引证文献19

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部