期刊文献+

一种提高非骨水泥股骨柄假体中置率的手术技巧 被引量:1

A New Surgical Technique to Improve the Probability of Femoral Stem Prosthesis Tips in Femoral Stem Central Zones During THA
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨全髋关节置换术(THA)中提高非骨水泥股骨柄中置率的手术技巧。方法自2011年1月-2014年2月,对156例髋关节疾病进行非骨水泥型THA治疗患者,分为先扩髓再开槽组及对照组采用传统的先开槽再扩髓,观察术后拍X线片上假体远端髓腔中置率及大腿痛发生率。结果术后X线片发现先扩髓再开槽组股骨柄远端的中置率较对照组高,对比两组之间差异具有统计学意义(P=0.000)。术后2-5年随访大腿前方疼痛发生率较对照组低,对比两者之间差异具有统计学意义(P=0.004)。结论先扩髓再开槽方法可提高股骨假体柄远端的中置率,并减少术后大腿前方疼痛,此方法简单、可靠,无需增加患者住院费用,利于大范围推广。 Objective In this study,a new operating procedure to improve the probability of femoral stem prosthesis tips in femoral stem central zones was developed,the clinical outcome was then comapared with that of control group during cemetless total hip arthroplasty(THA).Methods 156 patients underwent cementless THA from January 2011 to February 2014 were divided into two groups(the reame fluting and the control groups). Radiology and thigh pain assessments were performed postoperation.ResultsAfter felow-up for(2-5 years),more middle rates of femoral stem prosthesis and less thigh pain incidences were recorded in the reame fluting group,when compared with the results from control group.ConclusionThe new operating procedure of reaming was able to make prosthesis tips in femoral centeral zones and to reduce the incidences of thigh pain. It is a reliable and easy method for extensive application without additionaly economic costs.
出处 《中国卫生标准管理》 2016年第15期54-57,共4页 China Health Standard Management
关键词 全髋关节置换 假体柄安装 大腿痛 Total hip arthroplasty Prosthesis fitting Thigh pain
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1郑学成,贾俊,单楠楠,郭晓伟.髋关节置换术人工股骨柄置入位置不佳的预防[J].辽宁医学杂志,2012,26(4):171-172. 被引量:1
  • 2Weber M, Woerner M, Springorum P,, et al. Fluoroscopy and imageless navigation enable an equivalent reconstruction of leg length and global and femoral ot'Eset in THA [J ] . Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2014, 472 (10) : 3150-3158.
  • 3Kuroda K, Kabata T, Maeda T, et al. Do we need intraoperative radiographs for positioning the femoral component in total hip arthroplasty? [J ] . Arch Orthop Trauma Surg, 2014, 134 ( 5 ) : 727 -733.
  • 4Farhang K, Desai P,, WilberJH, et al. An anatomical study of the entry point in the greater trochanter for intramedullary nailing [ J ] . BoneJoimJ, 2014, 96 (9) : 1274-1281.
  • 5Campbell AC, Rorabeck CH, Bourne RB, et al. Thigh pain after cementless hip arthroplasty. Annoyance or ill omen [ J ] . J Bone JointSurgBr, 1992, 74 (1) : 63-66.
  • 6张雷,杨国敬,郑进佑.人工髋关节置换术后大腿疼痛的研究现状[J].中华创伤骨科杂志,2007,9(2):177-180. 被引量:3
  • 7Marshall AD, MokrisJG, Reitman 1LD, et al. Cementless titaniumtapered-wedge fi, moral stem: 10- to 15-year follow-up [J ] . J Arthroplasty, 2004, 19 (5) : 546-552.
  • 8Kawamura H, Dunbar MJ, Murray P, et al. The porous coated anatomic total hip replacement. A ten to fourteen-year follow-up study of a cementless total hip arthroplasty [J ] . J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2001, 83 (9) : 1333-1338.
  • 9Burkart BC, Bourne IKB, Rorabeck CH, et al. Thigh pain in cementless total hip arthroplasty. A comparison of two systems at 2 years' follow-up [J ] . Orthop Clin North Am, 1993, 24 ( 4 ) : 645-653.
  • 10Longjohn, Dorr LD. Soft tissue balance of the hip [J ] . J ArthroplasW, 1998, 13 (1) : 97-100.

二级参考文献30

  • 1Lord G, Bancel P. The madreporic cementless total hip arthroplasty. New experimental data and a seven-year clinical follow-up study. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 1983, (176) : 67-76.
  • 2Callaghan JJ, Dysart SH, Savory CG. The uncemented porous-coated anatomic total hip prosthesis: two-year results of a prospective consecutive series. J Bone Joint Surg(Am), 1988, 70: 337-346.
  • 3Barrack RL, Paprosky W, Butler RA, et al. Patients' perception of pain after total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty, 2000, 15: 590-596.
  • 4Butler V, Lansky D, Duwelius PJ. Prospective evaluation of total hip arthroplasty with a eementless, anatomically designed, porous-coated femoral implant: mean 11-year follow-up. J Arthroplasty, 2005, 20: 709-716.
  • 5Campbell AC, Rorabeck CH, Bourne RB, et al. Thigh pain after eementless hip arthroplaty: annoyance or illomen. J Bone Joint Surg (Br), 1992, 74: 63-66.
  • 6Godsiff SP, Emery RJ, Heywood-Wadding'ton MB, et al. Cemented versus uncemented femoral components in the ring hip prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg (Br), 1992, 74: 822-824.
  • 7Weidenhielm LR, Mikhail WE, Nelissen RG, et allarless (Exeter-CPT) versus cementless collarlesscomponents: a 2- to 14-year follow-up evaluation.1995, 10: 592-597. Cemented col-(PCA) femoralJ Arthroplasty,
  • 8Zimmerman S, Hawkes WG, Hudson JI, et al. Outcomes of surgical management of total hip replacement in patients aged 65 years and older: cemented versus cemenfless femoral components and lateral or anterolateral versus posterior anatomical approach. J Orthop Res, 2002, 20: 182-191.
  • 9Kim YH, Kim JS, Cho SH. Primary total hip arthroplasty with a cementless porous-coated anatomic total hip prosthesis: 10- to 12-year resuits of prospective and consecutive series. J Arthroplasty, 1999, 14: 538-548.
  • 10Ravikumar K J, Marsh G. Internal fixation versus hemiarthroplasty versus total hip arthroplasty for displaced subcapital fractures of femur-13 year results of a prospective study. Injury, 2000, 31: 793-797.

共引文献2

同被引文献7

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部