期刊文献+

改良Alvarado评分联合多层螺旋CT术前检查对急性阑尾炎分层的临床价值 被引量:11

Clinical value of modified Alvarado score combined with multi-slice computed tomography for preoperative stratification in acute appendicitis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨改良Alvarado评分联合多层螺旋CT(MSCT)术前检查对急性阑尾炎分层的临床价值。方法有完整腹部CT资料的临床疑似急性阑尾炎患者316例,计算改良Alvarado评分并分成低,中,高分值区。计算MSCT诊断急性阑尾炎的准确率、敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值(PPV)和阴性预测值(NPV)。结果MSCT诊断急性阑尾炎的准确率、敏感性、特异性、PPV和NPV分别为97.5%,98.6%,96.5%,96.0%和98.8%。316例患者中,146例急性阑尾炎,170例非急性阑尾炎;128例外科手术确诊。非急性阑尾炎、不复杂阑尾炎和复杂阑尾炎改良Alvarado评分分别是5.95±2.27,6.67±1.97和6.67±2.25。急性阑尾炎低、中、高分值区分布依次增多,差异有统计学意义;女性各分值区分布均低于男性。结论改良Alvarado评分对急性阑尾炎术前分层有较高的临床价值,中低分值区需求助MSCT检查。 Objective To investigate the clinical value of modified Alvarado score and muhi - slice computed tomography (MSCT) for preoperative stratification in acute appendicitis. Methods A to- tal of 316 cases of suspected acute appendicitis underwent abdominal CT scan were assessed retrospective- ly using the modified Alvarado scoring system. The patients were divided into three groups as low, median, and high group according to the modified Alvarado score. The accuracy rate, sensitivity, specificity. PPV and NPV of MSCT in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis were calculated. The difference of the modified Alvarado score between patients with and without acute appendicitis by mean and standard deviation, and the distribution of acute appendicitis among different score groups were analyzed using X2-test. Results The accuracy rate,sensitivity,specificity. PPV and NPV of MSCT were 97.5% ,98.6% ,96.5% ,96.0% and 98.8%, respectively. Among all the suspected patients, there were 146 cases of acute appendicitis and 170 cases without acute appendicitis; 128 cases of diagnosis were confirmed by surgery. The scores of un- complicated appendicitis, and complicated appendicitis and other diseases, appendicitis score were 6.67 ± 1.97,6.67 :t: 2.25 and 5.95 ± 2.27, respectively. Distribution of acute appendicitis increased with the el- evation of Alvarado score and statistical analysis showed a significant difference in modified Alvarado scores among the groups. Women from the score distribution section were less than men. Conclusion Our Results suggest a high clinical value of modified Alvarado score for preoperative stratification in acute ap- pendicitis. MSCT scan is necessary in patients with low and median modified Alvarado score.
出处 《临床外科杂志》 2016年第8期608-610,共3页 Journal of Clinical Surgery
关键词 多层螺旋CT 改良Alvarado评分 急性阑尾炎 muhislice CT modified Alvarado score appendicitis
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

  • 1Memon ZA, Irfan S, Fatima K, et al. Acute appendicitis : Diagnostic ac- curacy of Alvarado scoring system [ J ]. Asian J Surg, 2013,36 ( 4 ) : 144-149.
  • 2Khan I, ur Rehman A. Application of Alvarado scoring system in diag- nosis of acute appendicitis [ J ]. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad ,2005,17 (3) :41-44.
  • 3李世宽,王海宽,李元博,彭新刚,王培戈,周岩冰,周晓斌.联合应用改良Alvarado评分与CT影像判别急性阑尾炎病理类型的意义[J].中华胃肠外科杂志,2012,15(12):1227-1231. 被引量:10
  • 4Mehzer AC, Baumann BM, Chen EH,et al. Poor Sensitivity of a Modi- fied Alvarado Score Adults with suspected Appendicitis [ J ]. Ann Emerg Med,2013,62(2) :126-131.
  • 5Jones RP,Jeffrey RB,Shah BR,et al. The Alvarado score as a method for reducing the number of CT studies when appendieeal ultrasound fails to visualize the appendix in adults[J]. AJR,2015,204(3) :519-526.
  • 6Pinto Leite N, Pereira JM, Cunha R, et al. CT evaluation of appendici- tis and its complication imaging techniques and key diagnostic finding [J]. AJR,2005,185(2) :406-417.

二级参考文献11

  • 1Simillis C,Symeonides P,Shorthouse AJ. A metaanalysis comparing conservative treatment versus acute appendectomy for complicated appendicitis (abscess or phlegmon)[J].Surgery,2010,(06):818-829.
  • 2Ansaloni L,Catena F,Coccolini F. Surgery versus conservative antibiotic treatment in acute appendicitis:a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials[J].Digestive Surgery,2011,(03):210-221.
  • 3Kalan M,Talbot D,Cunliffe WJ. Evaluation of modified Alvarado score in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis:A prospective study[J].Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England,1994,(06):418-419.
  • 4Hlibczuk V,Dattaro JA,Jin Z. Diagnostic accuracy of noncontrast computed tomography for appendicitis in adults:a systematic review[J].Annals of Emergency Medicine,2010,(01):51-59.
  • 5Flum DR,Koepsell T. The clinical and economic correlates of misdiagnosed appendicitis:nationwide-analysis[J].Archives of Surgery,2002,(07):799-804.
  • 6Jones K,Pe(n)a AA,Dunn EL. Are negative appendectomies still acceptable[J].American Journal of Surgery,2004,(06):748-754.
  • 7Moteki T,Horikoshi H. New CT criterion for acute appendicitis maximum depth of inraluminal appendiceal fluid[J].American Journal of Roentgenology,2007,(05):1313-1319.doi:10.2214/AJR.06.1180.
  • 8Levine CD,Aizenstein O,Wachsberg RH. Pitfalls in the CT diagnosis of appendicitis[J].British Journal of Radiology,2004,(921):792-799.doi:10.1259/bjr/95663370.
  • 9Terasawa T,Blackmore CC,Bent S. Systematic review:computed tomography and ultrasongraphy to detect acute appendicitis in adults and adolescents[J].Annals of Internal Medicine,2004,(07):537-546.
  • 10Bixby SD,Lucey BC,Soto JA. Perforated versus nonperforated acute appendicitis:accuracy of multidetector CT detection[J].Radiology,2006,(03):780-786.

共引文献9

同被引文献73

引证文献11

二级引证文献155

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部