期刊文献+

新辅助化疗对乳腺癌患者行腋窝前哨淋巴结活检术结果的影响研究 被引量:1

Effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on axillary sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients with breast cancer
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的研究新辅助化疗(NAC)对乳腺癌患者行腋窝前哨淋巴结活检术(SLNB)结果的影响。方法选取82例乳腺癌患者作为研究对象,其中新辅助化疗后行SLNB为观察组(n=40),未行新辅助化疗直接SLNB为对照组(n=42例),采用亚甲蓝示踪法进行SLNB,统计分析两组患者前哨淋巴结(SLN)的检出率、准确率、假阴性率、灵敏度。结果观察组SLN检出率为90.0%(36/40),SLNB预测腋窝淋巴结状况的准确率、假阴性率、灵敏度分别为94.4%(34/36),11.1%(2/18)和88.9%(16/18);对照组检出率为90.5%(37/42),SLNB预测腋窝淋巴结状况的准确率、假阴性率、灵敏度分别为94.6%(35/37),10.0%(2/20)和90.0%(18/20);两组比较,检出率、准确率、假阴性率、灵敏度方面的差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论新辅助化疗后SLNB临床意义未见明显改变。 Objective To study the effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) on axillary sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in breast cancer patients. Methods A total of 82 cases of breast cancer patients as the research object, which after neoadjuvant chemotherapy SLNB for the observation group (n=40), without neoadjuvant chemotherapy directly SLNB as control group (n=42). SLNB was carried out by the methylene blue tracer, and statistical analysis of two groups of patients with sentinel lymph node (SLN) detection rate, accuracy rate, false negative rate, and sensitivity was carried out. Results In observation group, the positive rate of SLN was 90.0% (36/40), SLNB in predicting axillary lymph node status of the accuracy rate, false negative rate, sensitivity was 94.4% (34/36), 11.1% (2/18) and 88.9% (16/18) respectively; In control group, the positive rate of SLN was 90.5% (37/42), SLNB in predicting axillary lymph node status of the accuracy rate, false negative rate and sensitivity were 94.6% (35/37), 10.0% (2/20) and 90.0% (18/20). There was no significant difference in the detection rate, accuracy rate, false negative rate and sensitivity between the two groups (P〉0.05). Conclusion There was no significant change in the clinical significance of SLNB after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
作者 张晓剑
出处 《临床普外科电子杂志》 2016年第2期21-23,共3页 Journal of General Surgery for Clinicians(Electronic Version)
关键词 乳腺癌 新辅助化疗 前哨淋巴结活检 Breast cancer Neoadjuvant chemotherapy Sentinel lymph node biopsy
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献47

  • 1李健,刘雄英,陈瑞娥.联合检测血清CA153 CA125 CA199在乳腺癌早期诊断中的价值[J].实用医技杂志,2008,15(13):1696-1698. 被引量:12
  • 2张哲民.联合检测血清CYFRA21-1、CA153及NSE在肺癌诊治中的临床意义[J].中国癌症杂志,2005,15(6):566-568. 被引量:10
  • 3US Preventive Services Task Force.Screening for breast cancer:US Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement.Ann Intern Med,2009,151:716-726.
  • 4National Comprehensive Cancer Network.NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology:breast cancer screening and diagnosis,version.1.2010,11/03/03 2009.Washington:National Comprehensive Cancer Network,Inc,2009:3.
  • 5Woolf SH.The 2009 breast cancer screening recommendations of the US Preventive Services Task Force.JAMA,2010,303:162-163.
  • 6Pisano ED,Gatsonis C,Hendrick E,et al.Diagnostic performance of digital versus film marnrnography for breast cancer screening.N Engl J Med,2005,353:1773-1783.
  • 7Pisano ED,Hendrick RE,Yaffe MJ,et al.Diagnostic accuracy of digital versus film mammography:exploratory analysis of selected population subgroups in DMIST.Radiology,2008,246:376-383.
  • 8Skaane P,Hofvind S,Skjennald A.Randomized trial of screenfilm versus full-field digital mammography with soft-copy reading in population-based screening program:follow-up and final results of Oslo Ⅱ study.Radiology,2007,244:708-717.
  • 9US Department of Health and Human Services.United States Cancer Statistics:2004 incidence and mortality.Washington:US Department of Health and Human Services,2007.
  • 10Jemal A,Siegel R,Ward E,et al.Cancer Statistics,2009.CA Cancer J Clin,2009,59:225-249.

共引文献78

同被引文献6

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部