期刊文献+

论情报政治化实现方式的区别 被引量:6

A Comparative Study on Implementation Approaches of Intelligence Politicization
下载PDF
导出
摘要 [目的/意义]鉴于情报政治化可能造成严重的情报失误,欲图通过研究情报政治化的实现方式,剖析其实现方式的区别,梳理出应对情报政治化不良影响的措施。[方法/过程]通过借鉴国际关系中的相关理论,将情报政治化区分为"软政治化"和"硬政治化"两种实现形式,并结合案例对比二者在封闭系统、精英系统以及公众系统的表现形式。[结论/结果]明确了如何区分两种实现形式,并就如何尽量避免情报政治化提出了三点建议。 [ Purpose/Significance ] Given the potential intelligence failure resulted from intelligence politicization, this paper tries to study the implementation approaches of intelligence politicization so as to find out the effective measures against intelligence politicization. [ Method/Procedure] By introducing the international relation theory, the paper classified intelligence politicization into two categories of soft politicization and hard politicization. Comparison between them is then made in closed system, elite system and public system via case study. [ Result/Conclusion] Finally, this paper makes it clear how to distinguish the two implementation approaches and concludes with advices on how to avoid intelligence politicization.
出处 《情报杂志》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第9期20-23,共4页 Journal of Intelligence
关键词 情报政治化 软政治化 硬政治化 intelligence politicization soft politicization hard politicization
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献17

  • 1乔迪.兰德决策[M].成都:天地出版社,1998:65-72.
  • 2张晓军.美国军事情报理论研究[M].北京:军事科学出版社,2011 :15,103-107,168-170,132-134.
  • 3Kent S. Stxategic Intelligence: For American World Policy [ M ]. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1949 : 180.
  • 4Davis J. The Kent-Kendall Debate of 1949 [ J]. Studies in Intelli- gence, 1992,36 (5) :91.
  • 5Cimbala S J. Intelligence and Intelligence Policy in a Democratic Society [ M ]. Dobbs Ferry: Transnational Publishers, INC, 1987 : 129.
  • 6Betts R K. Surprise Attack [ M ]. Washington D. C. : Brookings Institution, 1982:42.
  • 7Lippmann W. Public Opinion E M ]. New York: Macmillan Com- pany, 1922:2.
  • 8Murphy J, Smith K W. Making Intelligence Analysis Responsive to Policy Concerns[ J]. Studies in Intelligence,1973,17(2) :5.
  • 9Davis J. Improving CIA Analytic Performance:Analysts and the Polieymaking Progress [ J ]. Occasional Papers, 2002,1 ( 2 ) : 1 -6.
  • 10Davis J. Tensions in Analyst-policymaker Relations:Opinions, Facts, and Evidence [ J ]. The Sherman Kent Center for Intelli- gence Analysis Occasional Papers ,2003,2 (2) :8.

同被引文献48

二级引证文献34

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部