摘要
伴随信息时代的到来,学术交流方式不断发生变化,越来越多原创性的最新学术成果发表在开放获取的数字出版平台上。同时,更多的学者在科学研究和学术交流过程中应用社会网络工具与同行进行学术探讨,替代计量学作为学术评估的新方式逐步兴起,在科研评价领域发挥着日益重要的作用。对替代计量学和OA资源进行研究,寻找其相关关系,思考如何更好的发挥二者的作用。通过ScienceDirect数据库和Scopus数据库获取期刊的信息并进行筛选,使用Altmetric.com和Plumx作为替代计量学指标来源,分年份计算■■、■■■和OAAA值并观察趋势。研究发现,OA论文与替代计量学存在相关关系,对于同一种混合期刊,OA论文的替代计量分数高于NOA论文;且这一相关性随着出版时间的推移逐渐减弱。最后,从二者互为补充、替代计量学对OA的价值作用、二者的共同特征三方面对其相关性进行论述。以期对学术界的替代计量学研究以及OA资源的利用提供参考。
With the advent of the information age, academic communication is changing, more and more original academic achievements are published in the open access digital publishing platforms. At the same time, more scholars use social media to communicate with their peer in scientific research. Altmetrics is rising gradually as a new academic assessment method, and it is playing an important role in the area of evaluation research. We studied AItmetrics and OA resources to find their relationship. Thinking about how to better play the role of them. We get journal' s information and screen some papers from ScienceDirect Database and Scopus Database, using Altmetric. com and Plumx as the alternative source of metrology index, calculating yearly OA ,NOA and OAAA values and observing the trend. We discover that, there is a relationship between OA resources and Altmetrics. For the same hybrid journals, the Altmetrics of OA resources is higher than NOA resources. And this correlation decreased with the publishing time. Finally, we discussed their relationship from their supplementary,the value of Altmetrics for OA resources,their common features and so on. Hoping to provide references to the research of the Altmetrics and the use of OA resources.
出处
《图书情报知识》
CSSCI
北大核心
2016年第5期84-92,共9页
Documentation,Information & Knowledge
基金
武汉大学自主科研项目"社交网络环境下面向利用过程的学术成果评价新体系构建研究"的成果之一