期刊文献+

模仿同构对企业国际化-绩效关系的影响--基于制度理论正当性视角的实证研究 被引量:65

Influence of Mimetic Isomorphism on Firms' Internationalization—Performance Relationship——An Empirical Study Based on Legitimacy Perspective in Institutional Theory
原文传递
导出
摘要 中国企业对外直接投资连续13年高速增长并位列全球三甲,但面临国际化水平较低、国际化经验不足、国际化绩效较差等诸多问题。在国际化能提高绩效时,企业进行国际扩张是合理的选择,为什么还有许多企业在国际化绩效并不好的情况下也选择国际化?制度理论认为,企业开展的很多经营活动不是为了更高效而是为了更相似,当组织场域内的成功企业或相似企业采用国际化战略时,现有企业为了获得制度正当性,也将通过国际化经营进行模仿同构。本文基于制度理论正当性视角和组织场域的模仿同构行为,采用2009—2014年中国制造业上市公司数据进行实证分析,结果发现:1作为新兴经济体中的后发企业,中国企业绩效随国际化程度的变动关系呈现低国际化程度时与绩效负相关、高国际化程度时与绩效正相关的U型形态;总体上,中国企业国际化与绩效间关系已经是正相关关系。2基于制度正当性而进行的模仿同构对企业的国际化—绩效关系具有显著的积极调节作用,不管是本文构造的相似企业模仿指数还是成功企业模仿指数,都能有效增强企业国际化—绩效的正相关关系,或有效减弱两者之间的负相关关系。这说明,企业可以通过模仿同构而获得更多组织正当性、改善国际化绩效。这一独特的制度正当性理论视角,将给企业国际化—绩效关系研究,贡献以组织场域中的模仿同构作为调节因素的企业国际化绩效改善机制。 The outward direct investments (ODI) of China enterprises have increased for continuous 13 years and China has been one of the largest three powers in the world. However, there exist many problems in China's ODI, such as low international level, lack of international experience, bad international performance, etc. If internationalization could improve performance, the geographic expanding is a reasonable choice for firms. But why do many enterprises go abroad when their international performances are unsatisfactory? In institutional theory views, many processes of firms occur to make them more similar with each other instead of making them more efficient. When successful enterprises or similar enterprises in the same organizational field adopt international strategy, the focal firms will also choose internationalization to obtain institutional legitimacy by mimetic isomorphism. So based on legitimacy perspective in institutional theory and mimetic isomorphism in organizational field, we analyze data from China listed firms in manufacturing industry from 2009 to 2014 and get following results: (~)As latecomers from emerging economies suffering liability of newness and liability of foreignness, the internationalization-performance relation of China firms appears to be U-shape, which means negative correlation while firms have low degree of internationalization and positive correlation while firms have high degree of internationalization. Nevertheless, it shows a positive internationalization-performance relation as a whole. @)The mimetic isomorphism for institutional legitimacy has significant positive moderating effect on firms' internationalization-performance relation. Both similar-firm-mimetic index and successful-firm-mimetic index constructed by us can strengthen the positive correlation of internationalization-performance, or weaken the negative correlation. This shows that firms can obtain more organizational legitimacy by mimetic isomorphism and then improve their international performance. This unique organizational legitimacy theoretical perspective will contribute a mechanism of international performance improving to internationalization-performance study area by taking mimetic isomorphism in organizational field as a moderator.
出处 《中国工业经济》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第9期127-143,共17页 China Industrial Economics
基金 国家社会科学基金重大项目“全球产业链转移新趋势下的中国出口价值链提升举措研究”(批准号15ZDA061) 国家自然科学基金面上项目“国际化战略是否有助于企业提高绩效--基于资源和制度的双重调节模型构建”(批准号71372123) 武汉大学人文社会科学“70后”学者学术发展计划“中国企业的国际竞争力提升”学术团队建设计划(批准号WD70BSM)
关键词 国际化 绩效 模仿同构 制度理论 正当性 internationalization performance mimetic isomorphism institutional theory legitimacy
  • 相关文献

参考文献35

  • 1United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. World Investment Report 2014: Investing in the SDGs: An Action Plan[R]. Switzerland: United Nations Publication, 2014.
  • 2理查德·斯科特.制度理论:对理论研究项目的贡献[A].肯·斯密斯,迈克尔·希特.管理学中的伟大思想:经典理论的开发历程[C].北京:北京大学出版社,2010.
  • 3Meyer, J. W., and B. Rowan. Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony[J]. American Journal of Sociology, 1977,83 (27) :340-363.
  • 4DiMaggio, P. J., and W. W. Powell. The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields[J]. American Sociological Review, 1983,48(2): 147-160.
  • 5Grant, R. M. Multi-nationality and Performance among British Manufacturing Companies[J]. Journal of International Business Studies, 1987,18(3) :79-89.
  • 6Collins, J. M. A Market Performance Comparison of U.S. Firms Active in Domestic Developed and Developing Countries[J]. Journal of International Business Studies, 1990,21(2):271-287.
  • 7Sullivan, D. Measuring the Degree of Internationalization of a Firm[J]. Journal of International Business Studies,1994,25(2):325-342.
  • 8Hitt, M. A., R. E. Hoskisson, and H. Kim. International Diversification: Effects on Innovation and Firm Performance in Product-diversified Firms[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 1997,40(4):767-798.
  • 9Lu, J. W., and P. W. Beamish. International Diversification and Firm Performance: The S-curve Hypothesis[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2004,47 (4) : 598-609.
  • 10Contractor, F. J., S. K. Kundu, and C. C. Hsu. A Three-stage Theory of International Expansion: The Link between Multi-nationality and Performance in the Service Sector [J]. Journal of International Business Studies, 2003,34(1 ) :5-18.

二级参考文献161

共引文献658

同被引文献817

引证文献65

二级引证文献508

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部