我国宗教财产的归属与监管问题研究

On Religious Property's Ownership and Supervision in China

宗教财产社会团体所有说在我国司法实践中备受争议且未被真正适用,《物权法》也有意回避之。宗教财产的目的性本质包括宗教性、公益性和公用性,保障实现宗教财产的目的性功用比单纯定位宗教财产的归属更有现实意义。我国应采取统一的宗教财产监管模式,强化目的性功用的宗教财产监管理念,设立以宗教财产监察人为核心的内部监管机制,形成行政监督和社会监督相协调的外部监督机制,并明确违反宗教财产目的性功用的主体法律责任。

The ownership of religious property of social organization in China＇ s social practice is undergoing dispute and is not really put into practice. Meantime, the Property Law also intends to avoid mentioning it. The purposiveness of religious property includes reli- giousness, public welfare and public use. Guaranteeing the purposiveness of using religious property has more realistic meaning than making clear its ownership. Our country should adopt unified religious property regulation mode, strengthen the regulation concept of purposiveness of religious property, set up the internal？ supervising？ mechanism with the supervisor as the core of religious property, form the external supervision mechanism coordinated with administrative supervision and social supervision and define the subject legal responsibility for violating purposiveness of religious property.