期刊文献+

超声弹性成像与常规超声对乳腺病灶鉴别诊断的对比分析

下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的比较超声弹性成像与常规超声对乳腺病灶的诊断效果,为临床应用提供借鉴依据。方法:对我院2015年1月-2016年1月收治的120例乳腺患者进行回顾性分析,对超声弹性成像与常规超声2种方式鉴别诊断乳腺病灶的数据进行对比分析。结果:超声弹性成像的检查敏感性低于常规超声检查结果,特异性检查结果高于常规超声检查结果,差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05);2组检验结果准确性相近,不具有统计学意义(P〉0.05)。结论:研究表明,在对乳腺病灶鉴别诊断价值中,超声弹性成像更优越于常规超声,相比常规超声具有更大的信息量,虽然敏感洼较低,但是特异性较高,是-种值得推广的新的诊断方式。 Objective Thro ugh this article contrast ultrasound elasticity imaging and treatment effect of conventionalultrasonography in breast lesions, reference for clinical application in the future. Methods: from January 2015 to January 2016were analyzed retrospectively, 100 cases of breast patients using ultrasound elasticity imaging and differential diagnosis ofmammary gland lesions data contrast analysis of two ways. Results: ultrasound elasticity imaging inspection sensitivity is lowerthan conventional ultrasound as a result, the specificity test results than conventional ultrasound as a result, the difference wasstatistically significant (P〈 0.05); Two groups of test results accuracy, not statistically significant (P〉 0.05). Conclusion: thestudy showed that in value to differential diagnosis of breast lesions, ultrasound elasticity imaging is more superior to theconventional ultrasound and compared with the conventional ultrasound has a greater amount of information, while thesensitivity is low, but the specificity is higher, is a new diagnostic method is worth promoting.
出处 《世界中医药》 CAS 2016年第B03期957-958,共2页 World Chinese Medicine
关键词 超声弹性成像 常规超声 乳腺病灶 鉴别对比 ultrasound elasticity imaging Conventional ultrasonic Breast lesions Identification of contrast
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献94

共引文献209

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部