期刊文献+

正反馈交易、风险溢出与瀑布效应——基于沪深300现货指数与期货指数联动作用的经验研究 被引量:5

Positive Feedback Trading,Risk Spillover and Cascade Effect ——An Empirical Analysis of the Interactive Effects Between CSI 300 Stock Index and Futures Index
下载PDF
导出
摘要 利用VAR模型和ARCH系列模型,对2015年沪深300现货指数及期货指数之间的联动关系进行了计量检验,研究结果表明:正反馈交易行情下,沪深300指数现货市场与期货市场之间形成了风险溢出和波动积聚的联动反应,并在流动性约束的条件下不断循环和加剧,最终引发了股指断崖式下跌的"瀑布效应"。进一步的分析揭示:市场交易主体的结构失衡、交易制度的不完备、噪声交易者的"羊群行为"及监管措施的反应滞后是"瀑布效应"形成的重要原因。 The VAR model and a series of ARCH models were used to test the interactive effects between CSI 300 stock index and futures index in 2015. The results showed that under the positive feedback trading quotation, the risk spillover and fluctuating accumulation are formed between Shanghai and Shenzhen 300 index spot market and index futures market ,which recycle and intensify under the constraint of liquidity, ultimately leading to the violent falling of stock indexes (i. e.,cascade effect). The further analysis revealed that the important reasons for forming the cascade effect are structural imbalance of market traders, imperfect trading system,“herd behavior” of noise traders and delayed reaction of regulatory measures.
出处 《东北大学学报(社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第5期464-469,共6页 Journal of Northeastern University(Social Science)
关键词 正反馈 波动积聚 非对称冲击 瀑布效应 positive feedback fluctuating accumulation asymmetric sho ck cascade effect
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献78

  • 1宿玉海,黄鑫.中国股市波动性研究——基于Shiller-Sentana-Wadhwani模型[J].山东财政学院学报,2005(4):52-55. 被引量:3
  • 2李华,程婧.股指期货推出对股票市场波动性的影响研究——来自日本的实证分析[J].金融与经济,2006(2):81-83. 被引量:72
  • 3徐永韬,李忠民,王远志.股票指数期货与正反馈交易行为——对中国股市的实证研究[J].沈阳理工大学学报,2006,25(4):88-91. 被引量:6
  • 4Aragó V, Corredor P, Santamaría R. Transaction costs, arbitrage, and volatility spillover: A note[J]. International Review of Economics & Finance, 2013, 12(3): 399-415.
  • 5Zigrand J P. A general equilibrium analysis of strategic arbitrage[J]. Journal of Mathematical Economics, 2004, 40(8): 923-952.
  • 6Cai M C, Deng X T, Li Z F. Computation of arbitrage in frictional bond markets[J]. Theoretical Computer Science, 2006, 363(3): 248-256.
  • 7Officer M S. Are performance based arbitrage effects detectable? Evidence from merger arbitrage[J]. Journal of Corporate Finance, 2007, 13(5): 793-812.
  • 8Xing X J. A note on the time-series relationship between market industry concentration and market volatility[J]. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 2004, 14(2): 105-115.
  • 9Cassola N, Morana C. Comovements in volatility in the euro money market[J]. Journal of International Money and Finance, 2010, 29(3): 525-539.
  • 10Li J Y. Option-implied volatility factors and the cross-section of market risk premia[J]. Journal of Banking & Finance, 2012, 36(1): 249-260.

共引文献72

同被引文献44

二级引证文献15

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部