期刊文献+

对美国NFPA101《生命安全规范》的探析 被引量:4

Exploration and Enlightenment of US NFPA101 " Life Safety Code"
下载PDF
导出
摘要 美国NFPA 101《生命安全规范》(以下简称NFPA 101)经过100多年的发展完善,体系渐趋成熟,由于其出色的工作,在美国生命安全保障工作中发挥了巨大作用。运用文献资料法对美国NFPA101进行探析,深入分析其发展历程,对其在美国的实际应用现状进行分析,以期为我国逃生自救训练的发展,以及生命安全教育提供有效借鉴。在借鉴经验的基础上,提出启示:提高家庭与学校对增强逃生自救技能学习的意识;制订专门的政策和法规,扶持逃生培训行业发展;以学校、培训机构为依托,培养高素质的专业型人才;中小学体育与健康课程中增加逃生自救训练内容;重点培养高校学生的逃生自救技能。 After more than 100 years of development, the system of US N F PA 101 "L ife Safety Code'1 (hereinafter referred as NFPA 101) is yet to mature,b. Because of its excellent w o rk ,N F PA 101 it played a huge role in the safe security work in the United States. Through using the method of literature review, this paper made a deeply thorough analysis on the historical development and practical application of US NFPA 101. The main purpose is to provide the reference for escape save and life safety education. Based on it,some suggestions are put forward: improving home-school learning for enhancing the awareness of escape self-help skills formulating specific policies and regulations to support the development of training industry to escape; with schools, training institutions as the basis, cultivating high-quality professional talents. The primary and middle school physical education and health curriculum in primary and secondary schools should increase escape self-help training content; ,and focus on training college students^ escape self-help skills.
作者 李冲 史曙生
出处 《首都体育学院学报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第5期419-422,共4页 Journal of Capital University of Physical Education and Sports
关键词 美国 NFPA 101 逃生训练 生命安全教育 学校体育 中小学体育与健康课程 United States NFPA 1 0 1 escape savedrill life safety education school physical education pri-mary and middle school physical education and health curriculum in primary and secondary schools
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献39

  • 1郁震飞,陈保胜.历史街区消防规划初探[J].中国公共安全(学术版),2009(4):83-86. 被引量:16
  • 2斯科特·拉什,王武龙.风险社会与风险文化[J].马克思主义与现实,2002,54(4):52-63. 被引量:308
  • 3Douglas M. 1970: Natural Symbols, Explorations in Cosmology. Barrie & Rockliff, London.
  • 4Douglas M. 1978: Cl~ltural Bias. Royal Anthropological Institute Occasional Paper No. 35, Royal Anthropological Institute, London (reprin- ted in: M. Douglas, 1982a, In the Active Voice, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London, pp. 183 - 254).
  • 5Douglas M. (ed.). 1982b: Essays in the Sociology of Perception. Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.
  • 6Douglas M. 1982c: Introduction to grid/group analysis. In: Douglas M. ( ed. ), Essays in the Sociology of Perception. Routledge & Kegan Paul, London, pp. 1 - 8.
  • 7Douglas M. 1985: Risk Acceptability according to the Social Sciences, Russell Sage Foundati6n, New York.
  • 8Douglas M. 1992: Risk and Blame: Essays in Cultural Theory. Routledge, London.
  • 9Douglas M. 1997: The depolitisation of risk. In: Ellis R. J. and Thompson M. (eds), Culture Matters. Westview, Boulder, pp. 121 - 132.
  • 10Douglas M. and Wildavsky A. 1982 : Risk and Culture, an Essay on the Selection of Technological and Environmental Dangers. University of California Press, Berkeley.

共引文献23

同被引文献27

引证文献4

二级引证文献22

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部