期刊文献+

国企高管权力强度和资本投资与公司业绩波动 被引量:3

Managerial Power in State-Owned Enterprises,Capital Investment and Fluctuations of Performance
下载PDF
导出
摘要 投资活动作为公司最重要的理财活动之一,对公司未来业绩以及业绩的稳定性影响重大,而投资决策不可避免的受到公司高管权力强度的影响。以2004—2013年我国沪深两市国有控股上市公司为研究样本,采用固定效应模型探讨了企业高级管理层的权力强度与企业投资规模之间的相互作用关系,并且深入研究了权力强度如何影响由投资所产生的绩效波动。结果表明,高管权力强度与资本投资正相关,地方政府终极控制的上市公司较之中央控股的公司高级管理层权力强度对于投资更加敏感;投资产生的绩效波动受高级管理层权力的影响被进一步放大,地方政府此种效应比中央政府控股的公司更加显著。 The investmentactivities of company as one of the most important financial activities,for the future performance of the company and the stability of the performance have a vital effect. Taking the state-owned listed companies in Shanghai and Shenzhen as the research sample in 2004- 2013,and using the fixed effect model to discuss the relationship between the managerial power in companies and the investment scale of companies,and to further study how the managerial power affects the fluctuations of performance by the investment. The conclusions are as follow: Managerial power in state-owned enterprises has positive effect on the firms' capital investment. Moreover,the correlation between investment and managerial power in local government-owned enterprises is more significant than central government-owned enterprises. Managerial power influences the correlation between fluctuations of performance and investment positively,and the positive influence is found more significantly in local government-owned enterprises.
作者 杭建民 于蕾
出处 《天津大学学报(社会科学版)》 CSSCI 2016年第4期298-303,共6页 Journal of Tianjin University:Social Sciences
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(71172067) 教育部人文社科研究规划基金资助项目(15YJA630028) 天津市教委重大基金资助项目(2014ZD52)
关键词 高管权力强度 资本投资 业绩波动 managerial power in state-owned enterprises capital investment fluctuations of performance
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1Grossman S, Hart O. The costs and benefits of ownership: A theory of vertical and lateral integration [J]. Journal of Po- litical Economy ,1986 (94) : 691-719.
  • 2Aghion P, Tirole J. Formal and real authority in organiza- tions [J]. Journal of Political Economy, 1997 (105) : 1-29.
  • 3Chen J, Ezzamel M, Cai Z. Managerial power theory, tour- nament theory, and executive pay in China [J].Journal of Corporate Finance, 2011, 17(4) :1176-1199.
  • 4方军雄.高管权力与企业薪酬变动的非对称性[J].经济研究,2011,46(4):107-120. 被引量:333
  • 5Van Essen, Marc, Otten ], Carberry E J. Assessing manag- erial power theory: A recta-analytic approach to understand- ing the determinants of CEO compensation [ J ]. Journal of Management, 2015,41 ( 1 ) :164-202.
  • 6Grinstein Y, Hribar P. CEO compensation and incentives- evidence from M&A bonuses [ J ]. Journal of Financial Eco- nomics, 2004 (73):119-143.
  • 7Mishra D R. Multiple large shareholders and corporate risk taking : Evidence from east asia [ J ]. Corporate Governance : An International Review, 2011, 19(6) :507-528.
  • 8卢锐,魏明海,黎文靖.管理层权力、在职消费与产权效率--来自中国上市公司的证据[J].南开管理评论,2008,11(5):85-92. 被引量:427
  • 9Finkelstein S, Boyd B K. How much does the CEO matter,9 The role of managerial discretion in the setting of CEO com- pensation[ J ]. The Academy of Management Journal , 1998 (41) :179-199.
  • 10Bertrand M , Mullainathan S. Enjoying the quiet life 9 Cor- porate governance and managerial preferences [ J ]. Journal of Political Economy, 2003( 111 ) : 1043-1075.

二级参考文献61

共引文献728

同被引文献46

引证文献3

二级引证文献18

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部