期刊文献+

话轮转换下的《蛙》中陈鼻性格特征及变化研究 被引量:1

Analysis of the Personalities of Chen Bi of Frog Based on Turn-Taking Theory
下载PDF
导出
摘要 随着本研究领域内容的不断丰富与发展,话轮转换理论已由将日常会话作为研究对象分析会话参与者的话轮特征,逐渐扩大到日常会话以外的其他机构会话的研究中。目前,国内外利用话轮转换进行的研究大都基于英文文本,鲜有以中文文本作为分析对象的研究。为验证该理论对于中文文本分析的适用性,文章在继承传统的话轮转换分析框架的基础上,提出了话轮发话率与话轮控制率、话轮比例与话语比例等变量,对《蛙》中陈鼻的会话进行了量化分析,并对其话轮特征进行了对比研究。研究表明,在中文文学作品中人物的性格特征及其变化与其话轮特征紧密相关,而且话轮转换理论同样适用于中文文本分析。 Turn-taking Theory,which is first introduced by Harvey Sacks in 1970 s,has been proved effective in analyzing the power relationships and personalities of characters in English literature works. However,the research on the applicability of the theory on Chinese literature works is far from sufficient,hence scientific verification of it is urgently required. This paper aims at making analysis on the Chinese novel,Frog,from the perspective of turn-taking to verify the applicability of the theory on Chinese literature works. To make the theory better fit for the analyses in this paper,some revisions are made on the framework of turn-taking proposed by Li Huadong and Yu Dongming. Five sets of conversations are carefully selected as samples for the analysis under the revised framework of the turn-taking. The finding of the research reveals that turntaking theory is equally effective in analyzing Chinese novels since the result indicates that the personality variations and the turn changes of Chen Bi are closely related.
出处 《天津大学学报(社会科学版)》 CSSCI 2016年第4期367-372,共6页 Journal of Tianjin University:Social Sciences
基金 天津市哲学社会科学规划基金资助项目(TJWW13-018)
关键词 话轮转换 人物性格 话轮发话率 话题控制率 话轮长度 turn-taking personality initiative turns control of turns turn length
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献8

  • 1杨雪燕.话语分析与戏剧语言文体学[J].外语教学与研究,1991,23(2):17-22. 被引量:26
  • 2杨雪燕.试论戏剧在语言文体学中的地位[J].外国语,1989,12(1):69-72. 被引量:20
  • 3俞东明.戏剧文体与戏剧文体学[J].浙江大学学报(社会科学版),1996,26(1):100-103. 被引量:46
  • 4刘海平.英美戏剧[M].南京:南京大学出版社,1991.273-277.
  • 5俞东明.英语戏剧文体学的范围、性质与方法[A].王德春.英语百人百论[C].成都:四川科学技术出版社,1993.
  • 6Bennison, V.Discourse Analysis and the Dramatic Character [J].Journal of Language and Literature.2 (1993).
  • 7Sacks, H.Schegloff, A.& Jefferson, G.A Simplest Systematics for the Organization of Turn-taking for Conversation [J].Language.50 (1974).
  • 8Short, M.H.Discourse analysis and the analysis of drama [A].Carter, R.& Simpson, Language, Discourse and Literature [C].ed.P.London: Unwin Hyman, 1989.

共引文献93

同被引文献4

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部