期刊文献+

无医疗干预初产妇自然分娩的妊娠结局分析 被引量:51

The natural delivery outcome of primipara without interventions
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨无医疗干预初产妇自然分娩的妊娠结局。方法:将2013年1月至2014年12月在山东大学齐鲁医院住院分娩的3000例初产妇根据有无产程干预分为观察组和对照组,观察组1500例孕妇自然分娩,第一产程自由活动、饮食、休息,第二产程自主用力、自由体位分娩、无会阴保护、自然娩肩,第三产程延迟断脐、胎盘自然娩出;对照组1500例孕妇给予不同程度的医疗干预。比较两组孕妇的最终分娩方式及母儿结局。结果:观察组的自然分娩率、会阴完整率、新生儿评分高于对照组,而会阴切开率、会阴二度裂伤率、剖宫产率、产后出血量、羊水污染率明显低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组孕妇的孕周、总产程、新生儿出生体重、新生儿入住NICU率、羊水量、脐带绕颈等方面比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:对于低危初产妇,减少医疗干预,促进自然分娩,可获得较好的母儿结局。 Objective: To explore the natural delivery outcome of primipara without medical interventions. Methods: 3000 primipara who had delivery in Qilu Hospital of Shandong University from Jan. 2013 to Dec. 2014 were divided into two groups according to the delivery approach: observing group,1500 cases without medical intervention,who had free activities,food,rest in the first labor stage and independent labor force,free position without perineal protection delivery,waiting for shouders natural delivery in the second stage and delayed umbilical cord clamping after pulsation loss,natural delivery of placenta in the third stage; other 1500 cases with different medical interventions were taken as control group. Mode of delivery and pregnancy outcomes were compared between the two groups. Results: The natural delivery rate,intact perineum rate and apgar score at the 1st min after birth were higher in the observing group than that in the control group. The episiotomy rate,perineal second degree laceration rate,cesarean section rate,postpartum bleeding,amniotic fluid pollution rate in the observing group were lower than that in control group( P〈 0. 05). There were no significant differences in gestational weeks,total labor stage,amnitic fluid volume,neonatal weight and the number of newborn transferred to NICU between the two group( P 〉0. 05). Conclusions: For low-risk primipara,we can gain better outcome of pregnancy by reducing medical intervention and promoting natural delivery.
出处 《现代妇产科进展》 CSCD 北大核心 2016年第8期600-602,607,共4页 Progress in Obstetrics and Gynecology
关键词 无医疗干预 初产妇 自然分娩 妊娠结局 No medical intervation Primipara Natural delivery Pregnancy outcome
  • 相关文献

参考文献18

  • 1Frankman EA,Wang L,Bunker CH,et al.Episiotomy in the United States:has anything changed?[J].Am J Obstet Gynecol,2009,200(5):571-573.
  • 2Suzuki S,Satomi M.Episiotomy in the United States:has anything changed?[J].Am J Obstet Gynecol,2010,202(2):e5,e5.
  • 3谭晓青,余昕烊,漆洪波.限制会阴切开及会阴切口选择的临床探讨[J].实用妇产科杂志,2013,29(6):426-429. 被引量:47
  • 4侯磊,李光辉,邹丽颖,李长东,陈奕,阮焱,王欣,贾朝霞,张为远.全国剖宫产率及剖宫产指征构成比调查的多中心研究[J].中华妇产科杂志,2014,0(10):728-735. 被引量:482
  • 5Hamilton BE,Hoyert DL,Martin JA,et al.Annual summary of vital statistics:2010-2011[J].Pediatrics,2013,131(3):548-558.
  • 6Lumbiganon P,Laopaiboon M,Gulmezoglu AM,et al.Method of delivery and pregnancy outcomes in Asia:the WHO global survey on maternal and perinatal health2007-08[J].Lancet,2010,375(9713):490-499.
  • 7Gregory KD,Jackson S,Korst L,et al.Cesarean versus vaginal delivery:whose risks?Whose benefits?[J].Am J Perinatol,2012,29(1):7-18.
  • 8ACOG Practice bulletin no.115:Vaginal birth after previous cesarean delivery[J].Obstet Gynecol,2010,116(2 Pt1):450-463.
  • 9丰有吉,沈铿.妇产科学[M].第2版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2012:340.
  • 10Leeman LM,Rogers RG.Sex after childbirth:postpartum sexual function[J].Obstet Gynecol,2012,119(3):647-655.

二级参考文献49

  • 1汪萍,苏悦,周学勤.妊娠期妇女对分娩方式选择的调查分析[J].中国优生与遗传杂志,2006,14(5):80-81. 被引量:9
  • 2王炳顺,周利锋,高尔生,朱丽萍,高晓玲.产妇产后对分娩方式的再认识[J].中国妇幼保健,2006,21(20):2784-2787. 被引量:32
  • 3谷祖善 赵霞.应不应该做会阴切开.实用妇产科杂志,1993,:275-275.
  • 4Frankman EA, Wang L, Bunker CH, et al. Episiotomy in the United States : has anything changed ? [ J ]. Am J Obstet Gynecol,2009,200 (5) :573. e1 -e7.
  • 5Graham ID, Carroli G, Davies C, et al. Episiotomy rates around the world:an update[ J]. Birth ,2005,32(3 ) :219 - 223.
  • 6Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Management of third and fourth degree perineal tears following vaginal delivery [ M ]. Guide-line No 29. London :RCOG,2001:320 -321.
  • 7Nager CW, Helliwell JP. Episiotomy increases perineal laceration length in primiparous women [ J ]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2001,185 (2) :444 -450.
  • 8Bansal RK,Tan WM,Ecker JL,et al. Is there a benefit to episiotomy at spontaneous vaginal delivery? a natural experiment [ J ]. Am J Ob- stet Gynecol, 1996,175 (4) : 897 - 901.
  • 9Victoria LH, Joan L, Blomquigt, et al. Pelvic floor disorders after vagi- nal birth [ J ]. Obstet Gynecol, 2012,119 ( 2 Pt 1 ) : 233 - 239.
  • 10Werner CH, Schuler W, Meskendahl I. Midline episiotomy versus me- dio-lateral episiotomy:a randomized prospective study. Int J Gynecol Obstet Proceedings of 13th World Congress of Gynaecology and Ob- stetrics(FIGO) [J]. Singapore, 1991,1 ( 1 ) :33 -35.

共引文献690

同被引文献453

引证文献51

二级引证文献284

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部