期刊文献+

班固《离骚经章句序》与《离骚赞序》不能并时而作辨 被引量:5

Debate on the Impossibility for Ban Gu to write Preface to Commentaries on Li Sao and Preface to Li Sao Zan at the Same Time
下载PDF
导出
摘要 班固《离骚赞序》对《离骚》及屈原单纯为赞美态度,而《离骚经章句序》中则有批评。详考《离骚经章句序》,其中除批评屈原一面外,尚有褒扬其忠贞思想一面。《离骚经章句序》在观点上对《离骚赞序》实际上具有包容性,他们之间并非是矛盾的。凭两序差异断二者非同时之作的诸理由都难以讲通。因此,两序完全具有同时而作的可能性。 In Preface to Li Sao Zan(《 离骚赞序 》), Ban Gu only gave high praise to Li Sao and Qu Yuan. But in Preface to Commentaries on Li Sao(《离骚经章句序 》), he seemed critical of them. In fact, there were both praise and criticism in Preface to Commentaries on Li Sao. Therefore, there was no contradiction between these two prefaces: the latter included the former. So,using the difference between these two prefaces to prove they were written in different time is not persuasive. Accordingly, there was strong possibility for Ban Gu to write the two prefaces at the same time.
作者 谢天鹏
出处 《云梦学刊》 2016年第5期41-46,共6页 Journal of Yunmeng
关键词 《离骚经章句序》 《离骚赞序》 屈原 好而悲之 Preface to Commentaries on Li Sao Preface to Li Sao Zan Qu Yuan praise and sympathy
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献34

  • 1崔富章.班固笔下的屈原[J].深圳大学学报(人文社会科学版),1998,15(4):81-86. 被引量:2
  • 2《秦始皇本纪》
  • 3洪兴祖《楚辞补注》卷1.
  • 4《离骚经章句》.
  • 5《班孟坚序》.
  • 6《离骚赞序》.
  • 7《天问》.
  • 8《九歌》.
  • 9《章句》.
  • 10《楚辞文献学史论考》,成都:巴蜀书社1997年版,第287页.

共引文献2546

同被引文献125

引证文献5

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部