期刊文献+

血药浓度监测指导下的51例替考拉宁用药分析 被引量:6

Analysis of 51 Cases of Teicoplanin Administration under the Guidance of Blood Drug Concentration Monitoring
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨替考拉宁合理的给药方式及进行血药浓度监测(TDM)的必要性。方法:对使用替考拉宁治疗的51例患者的临床资料进行回顾性分析,按负荷给药方式和剂量不同,分为两组,A组:负荷量头三剂400 mg,ivgtt,每12 h给药一次。B组:负荷量头三剂200 mg,ivgtt,每12 h给药一次。所有患者在第4 d用药前30 min采集血样,应用HPLC法进行血药谷浓度(C_(min))监测。结果:C_(min)和负荷给药剂量及疗效相关。使用A组负荷剂量的患者C_(min)要明显高于使用B组负荷剂量的患者(P<0.05),对C_(min)监测患者进行剂量调整后,治疗效果好,且不良反应发生率低。结论:使用替考拉宁时,要规范负荷剂量,且有必要进行TDM监测,根据结果调整给药剂量,避免替考拉宁疗效不佳或发生不良反应。 Objective: To study the necessity of therapeutic drug monitoring(TDM) and the reasonable dose of teicoplanin. Methods: The clinical data of 51 patients who suffered from severe G+ infection and were treated with teicoplanin were retrospectively analyzed. According to the different loading modes and doses, patients were divided into two groups; group A(400 mg for the first three times, ivgtt, q12 h), group B(200 mg for the first three times, ivgtt, q12 h). The bloods samples were collected at 30 min the 4th day before administration, The C_(min) of teicoplanin was measured by means of HPLC. Results: The C_(min) of teicoplanin was closely related to the loading dose and therapeutic effect of patients. The C_(min) of patients in group A was higher than the patients in group B(P0.05). Clinical effect of patients was good after adjustments of maintenance dose according to the results of C_(min). The incidence of adverse reactions was low. Conclusion: A regular initial loading dose of teicoplanin made it possible to rapidly attain an optimal administration dose. It is necessary for patients treated with teicoplanin to adjust dose based on the result of TDM so as to avoid low efficacy or occurrence of side effect.
出处 《中国药事》 CAS 2016年第8期832-835,共4页 Chinese Pharmaceutical Affairs
关键词 糖肽类抗生素 替考拉宁 HPLC 负荷剂量 血药浓度检测 合理用药 sugar peptide antibiotics teicoplanin HPLC loading dose blood concentration detection rational drug use
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1Yoon YK, Park DW, Sohn JW, et al. MulticenterProspective Observational Study of the ComparativeEfficacy and Safety of Vancomycin Versus Teicoplanin inPatients with Health Care-associated Methicillin-resistantStaphylococcus Aureus Bacteremia[J]. Antimicrob AgentsChemother, 2014,58 ( 1 ) : 317-324.
  • 2Svetitsky S,Leibovici L,Paul M. Comparative Efficacyand Safety of Vancomycin Versus Teicoplanin: SystematicReview and Meta-analysis[J]. Antimicrob AgentsChemother, 2009,53 ( 10) : 4069-4079.
  • 3Tobin CM, Lovering AM, Sweeney E, et al. Analyses ofTeicoplanin Concentrations from 1994 to 2006 from a UKAssay ServicefJ]. J Antimicrob Chemother, 2010, 65(10); 2155-2157.
  • 4Wilson AP. Clinical Pharmacokinetics of Teicoplanin[J].Clin Pharmacokinet,2000,39 ( 3 ) : 167-183.
  • 5Lamont E,Seaton RA, Macpherson M , et al.Development of Teicoplanin Dosage Guidelines for PatientsTreated within an Outpatient Parenteral Antibiotic Therapy(OPAT ) Programme[J]. J Antimicrob Chemother,2009,64 ( 1 ) : 181-187.
  • 6Ueda T,Takesue Y, Nakajima K, et al. Evaluation ofTeicoplanin Dosing Designs to Achieve a New TargetTrough Concentration[J]. J Infect Chemother, 2012, 18(3): 296-302.
  • 7Begg EJ, Barclay ML, Kirkpatrick CM. The TherapeuticMonitoring of Antimicrobial Agents[J], Br J Clin Pharmacol.2001, 52: 35S-43S.
  • 8Wang JT, Liao HI,Wu LL, et al. Loading Dose Requiredto Achieve Rapid Therapeutic Teicoplanin Trough PlasmaConcentration in Patients with Multidrug-resistant Gram-positive InfectionsfJ]. Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol,2012,110 (5) : 416-420.
  • 9杨睿,鲁新华,张国俊.不同起始负荷剂量替考拉宁治疗革兰阳性菌下呼吸道感染的疗效与安全性评价[J].中华医院感染学杂志,2015,25(20):4673-4675. 被引量:16
  • 10江学维,梁蓓蓓,王凯,王瑾,王睿.替考拉宁药代动力学/药效学研究与给药方案优化[J].中国临床药理学杂志,2015,31(16):1662-1664. 被引量:31

二级参考文献20

  • 1俞汝佳,吕晓菊,过孝静,高燕渝.337株金黄色葡萄球菌对替考拉宁等的体外抗菌活性研究[J].中国抗生素杂志,2005,30(5):274-276. 被引量:5
  • 2Flamm RK, Mendes RE, Ross JE, et al. An international activity and spectrum analysis of linezolid: ZAAPS Program results for 2011 [ J], Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis ,2013,76:206 - 213.
  • 3Uhart M, Leroy B, Michaud A, et al. Inter - individual and intra - individual pharmacokinetic variability during teicoplanin therapy in geriatric patients [ J ]. Med Mal Infect, 2013,43:295 - 298.
  • 4Tascini C, Flammini S, Leonildi A, et al. Comparison of teicopla- nin and vancomycin in vitro activity on clinical isolates of Staphylo- coccus aureus[ J]. J Chemotherapy, 2012,24:187 - 190.
  • 5Kuti JL, Kiffer CR, Mendes CM, et al. Pharmacodynamic compari- son of linezolid, teicoplanin and vancomycin against clinical isolates of Staphylococcus aureus and coagulase - negative staphylococci col- lected from hospitals in Brazil [ J]. Clin Microbiol Infect, 2008,14: 116 - 123.
  • 6Ahn B J, Yim DS, Lee DG, et al. Teicoplanin dosing strategy for treatment of Staphylococcus aureus in Korean patients with neutro- penic fever [J]. Yousei Med J, 2011,52:616 -623.
  • 7Niwa T, Imanishi Y, Ohmori T, et al. Significance of individual adjustment of initial loading dosage of teicoplanin based on popula- tion pharmacokinetics [ J ]. Int J Antimicrob Agents, 2010, 35 : 507 - 510.
  • 8Pea F, Brollo L, Viale P, et al. Teicoplanin therapeutic drug moni- toring in critically ill patients: a retrospective study emphasizing the importance of a loading dose [ J ]. J Antimicrob Chemother , 2003, 51:971 - 975.
  • 9Ueda T, Takesue Y, Nakajima K, et al. High - dose regimen to a- chieve novel target trough concentration in teicoplanin [ J ]. J Infect Chemother ,2014 ,20 :43 - 47.
  • 10Wang JT, Liao HI, Wu Lin FL, et al. Loading dose required to a- chieve rapid therapeutic teicoplanin trough plasma concentration in patients with multidrug - resistant gram - positive infections [ J ]. Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol , 2012, 110:416 - 420.

共引文献42

同被引文献38

引证文献6

二级引证文献36

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部