期刊文献+

高龄胃癌患者术式评估及预后分析 被引量:2

Surgical modalities and prognosis in elderly patients with gastric cancer
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 了解行手术治疗的高龄胃癌患者的临床病理特征、术后并发症、围手术期死亡风险及预后影响因素.方法 回顾性分析2005年1月至2009年12月于北京医院胃肠外科行胃癌根治手术的63例高龄(≥75岁)胃癌患者的临床资料.按照手术方法分为DO(未行胃周淋巴结清扫)+D1(清扫胃周淋巴结数>15枚)手术组(32例)和D2(清扫腹腔血管周围淋巴结数>15枚)手术组(31例),对两组患者的临床病理特征、术后并发症、围手术期死亡风险进行比较,并分析影响预后的因素.结果 D2手术组的淋巴结清扫数(27.42±12.75)大于D0+D1手术组(14.59±12.11)(t=-4.095,P<0.05).两组并发症发生率[25.81% (8/31)比31.25% (10/32),X^2=0.095,P>0.05]及围手术期病死率[3.23%(1/31)比6.25%(2/32),X^2=0.324,P>0.05]差异无统计学意义.D2手术组患者5年生存率(47.3%)高于D0+D1手术组(21.4%),差异有统计学意义(X^2=6.346,P <0.05).生理学评分(PS) <20分的患者5年生存率(46.3%)高于PS≥ 20分的患者(11.1%),差异有统计学意义(X^2=5.492,P<0.05).PS≥20分组中,选择D2手术的患者术后并发症发生率(1/8)与D0+D1手术患者(3/10)比较,差异无统计学意义(X^2=0.824,P>0.05).预后分析显示,PS <20分与高龄胃癌患者预后相关(X^2=5.492,P<0.05),淋巴结转移(OR =4.103,95%CI:1.790-9.405,P<0.05)和D2手术(OR=0.313,95%CI:0.158- 0.620,P<0.05)是影响高龄胃癌患者的独立预后因素.结论 标准D2根治手术在高龄患者依然是适宜的手术方式.PS <20分与高龄胃癌患者预后相关.淋巴结转移和D2手术是影响高龄胃癌患者的独立预后因素. Objective To evaluate the surgical modalities and prognosis in elderly patients with gastric cancer.Methods Sixty three gastric cancer patients aged ≥≥ 75 years underwent radical surgery,with D0 + D1 resection in 32 cases and D2 resection in 31 cases,in Beijing Hospital from January 2005 to December 2009.Results More lymph nodes were dissected in D2 group than those in D0 + D1 group (27.42 ± 12.75 vs.14.59 ± 12.11,t =-4.095,P 〈 0.05).There was no significant difference in postoperative complication rate [25.81% (8/31) vs.31.25% (10/32),X^2 =0.095,P 〉 0.05] and perioperative death rate [3.23% (1/31) vs.6.25% (2/32),X^2 =0.324,P 〉 0.05] between two groups.The 5-year survival rate was higher in D2 group than that in D0 ± D1 group (47.3% vs.21.4%,X^2 =6.346,P 〈 0.05).The 5-year survival rate was higher in POSSUM score (PS) 〈 20 group than that in PS≥20 group (46.3% vs.11.1%,X^2 =5.492,P 〈0.05).In PS≥20 group,postoperative complication rate did not increase after D2 radical resection(1/8 vs.3/10,X^2 =0.824,P 〉 0.05).Univariate analysis showed that PS 〈 20 was associated with the prognosis of patients (X^2 =5.492,P 〈 0.05).Cox proportional hazards model showed that lymph node metastasis (OR=4.103,95% CI:1.790-9.405,P 〈 0.05) and D2 radical gastrectomy(OR =0.313,95% CI:0.158-0.620,P 〈 0.05) were the independent factors associated with the prognosis of patients aged ≥ 75 years with gastric cancer (all P 〈 0.05).Conclusion Standardized D2 lymph node dissection is beneficial for gastric cancer patients aged ≥75 years.PS 〈 20,lymph node metastasis and D2 radical gastrectomy are associated with the prognosis of patients.
机构地区 北京医院普外科
出处 《中华全科医师杂志》 2016年第9期693-697,共5页 Chinese Journal of General Practitioners
关键词 胃肿瘤 胃切除术 老年人 Stomach neoplasms Gastrectomy Aged
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

  • 1Endo S, Dousei T, Yoshikawa Y, et al. Prognosis of gastric carcinoma patients aged 85 years or older who underwent surgery or who received best supportive care only [ J ]. Int J Clin Onco], 2013,18(6) :1014-1019. DOI: 10. 1007/s10147-012-0482-9.
  • 2Endo S, Yoshikawa Y, Hatanaka N, et al. Treatment for gastric carcinoma in the oldest old patients [ J ]. Gastric Cancer, 2011,14 (2) : 139-143. DOI : 10. 1007/s10120-011-0022-8.
  • 3赵刚,曹祥龙,唐红,余涛,安琦,杨华,吴国举,肖刚.75岁及以上老年胃癌患者的手术治疗分析[J].中华老年医学杂志,2014,33(2):189-191. 被引量:11
  • 4Hayashi T, Yoshikawa T, Aoyama T, et al. Severity of complications after gastrectomy in elderly patients with gastric cancer[J]. World J Surg, 2012,36(9) :2139-2145. DOI: 10. 1007/s00268-012-1653-6.
  • 5Sobin LH, Gospodarowicz MK, Wittekink C. TNM classification of malignant tumours[ M]. 7th ed. Oxford:Wiley-Blackwell, 2009.
  • 6Japanese Gastric Cancer Association. Japanese classification of gastric carcinoma: 3rd English edition [J]. Gastric Cancer, 2011,14(2) :101-112. DOI: 10. 1007/s10120-011-0041-5.
  • 7Ajani JA, Bentrem DJ, Besh S, et al. Gastric cancer, version 2. 2013: featured updates to the NCCN Guidelines [ J ]. J Natl Compr Canc Netw, 2013, 11 (5) :531-546.
  • 8Copeland GP, Jones D, Waiters M. POSSUM: a scoring system for surgical audit[J]. Br J Surg, 1991,78(3) :355-360.
  • 9Biondi A, Cananzi FC, Persiani R, et al. The road to curative surgery in gastric cancer treatment : a different path in the elderly? [J]. J Am Coll Surg, 2012,215(6) :858-867. DOI: 10. 1016/j. jamcollsurg. 2012.08. 021.
  • 10Kiyokawa T, Hiki N, Nunobe S, et al. Feasibility of gastrectomy with standard lymphadenectomy for patients over 85 years old with gastric cancer [ J ]. Ann Surg Oncol, 2015,22 ( 12 ) : 3962-3969. DOI: 10. 1245/s10434-015-4489-0.

二级参考文献12

  • 1Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA, et al. Classification of surgical complications a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg, 2004,204 205-213.
  • 2Duggan M, Kavanagh BP. Perioperative modifications of respiratory function. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol, 2010, 24 : 145-155.
  • 3Akasaka T, Nishida T, Tsutsui S, et al. Short-term outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for early gastric neoplasm: multicenter survey by Osaka university study group. Dig Endosc, 2011, 23 : 73-77.
  • 4ChappellD, Jacob M, Hofmann KK, et al. A rational approach to perioperative fluid management. Anesthesiology, 2008, 109 : 723-740.
  • 5Stewart RM, Park PK, Hunt JP, et al. Less is more: improved outcomes in surgical patients with conservative fluid administration and central venous catheter monitoring. J Am Coll Surg, 2009, 208: 725-735.
  • 6Palma S, Cosano A, Mariscal M, et al. Cholesterol and serum albumin as risk {actors for death in patients undergoing general surgery. Br J Surg , 2007, 94:369-375.
  • 7Katai H, Sasako M, Sano T, et al. Gastric cancer surgery in the elderly without operative mortality. Surg Oncol, 2004, 13..235 238.
  • 8Oken MM,Creech RH,Tormey DC. Toxicity and response criteria of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group[J].{H}American Journal of Clinical Oncology(CCT),1982.649-655.
  • 9Saif MW,Makrilia N,Zalonis A. Gastric cancer in the elderly:an overview[J].J Can Surg,2010.709-717.
  • 10Eguchi T,Takahashi Y,Ikarashi M. Is extended lymph node dissection necessary for gastric cancer in elderly patients[J].{H}European Journal of surgery,2000.949-953.

共引文献12

同被引文献11

引证文献2

二级引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部