期刊文献+

静脉治疗安全文化评价指标体系的构建 被引量:6

Construction of safety culture evaluation system for intravenous treatment
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的构建静脉治疗安全文化评价指标体系,为建立适合我国静脉治疗安全文化评价工具提供参考。方法应用德尔菲(Delphi)法,由36位静脉治疗护理专家对拟定的静脉治疗安全文化评价指标进行两轮问卷咨询,获得一致性意见,初步构建静脉治疗安全文化评价指标体系。结果两轮专家咨询调查表的回收率分别为90.00%、94.40%;专家权威系数均>0.80;专家的协调系数为0.308,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。构建的静脉治疗安全文化评价指标体系包括5个一级指标和25个二级指标,专家对各项指标的意见趋同。结论通过该指标体系可了解静脉治疗安全文化现状,从而有针对性地进行改善,对保障患者静脉治疗安全具有重要的实践和指导意义。 Objective To construct safety culture evaluation system for intravenous treatment. Method On the basis of literature review and in- depth interview of two rounds using Delphi method, consensus was achieved to build an evaluation system for safety culture of intravenous treatment. Results The recovery rate from expert consultation questionnaires of two rounds was 90.00% and 94.40%, respectively. The expert′ s authority coefficient was greater than 0.80. The expert′ s coordination coefficient was 0.308, with significant difference statistically( P〈0.05). After two rounds of expert consultation, an evaluation index system for safety culture of intravenous treatment was formed, including five 5 primary indexes and 25 secondary indicators. The experts had consensus on the indexes. Conclusion The evaluation system can help us to understand the status quo of intravenous treatment′s safety culture so that we can make targeted improvement. It is of importance for guaranteeing the safety of patients with intravenous therapy.
出处 《现代临床护理》 2016年第6期59-63,共5页 Modern Clinical Nursing
基金 中国科协科研基金项目 项目编号为GGFZ2114010-A 广州医科大学科研立项资助项目 项目编号为2013B12) 广东省护理学会基金资助课题 项目编号为YH20150225
关键词 静脉治疗 安全文化 质量评价 德尔菲技术 intravenous treatment safety culture quality evaluation Delphi method
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1Singer SJ, Gaba DM, Geppert JJ, et al. The culture of safety: results of an organization-wide survey in 15 California hospitals [ J ]. Qual Saf Health Care, 2003,12 (2) : 112-118.
  • 2田敏,刘峰,陶俊荣,宋红霞.影响患者安全的护理组织因素及其权重分析[J].中华护理杂志,2014,49(6):696-699. 被引量:32
  • 3Singla AK, Kitch BT, Weissman JS, et al. Assessing patient safety culture : a review and synthesis of the measurement tools [ J ]. Journal of Patient Safety, 2006,2 (3) : 105-115.
  • 4罗敏,谢惠兰,欧阳庆,刘玉娥,成放群,胡碧波,周利华,周扬飞,张晓玲,唐颖,刘颖.中文版曼彻斯特病人安全框架的构建与测评[J].现代临床护理,2015,14(12):1-6. 被引量:6
  • 5Hartmann CW, Rosen AK, Meterko M, et al. An over-view of patient safety climate in the VA [ J ]. Health Serv Res, 2008,43(4) : 1263-1284.
  • 6许璧瑜,张晋昕,成守珍,梁碧宁,张小燕,许红璐,方海云,张熙,王霄,刘明华,薛允莲.医疗机构患者安全文化测评量表信度与效度研究[J].中华护理杂志,2010,45(9):840-842. 被引量:32
  • 7Moussa A, Bridges-Webb C. Quality of care in general practice: A delphi study of indicators and methods [ J ]. Aust Fam Phvsician. 1994 (23 ) : 465-468.472-473.
  • 8Institute of Medicine. To err is human : Building a safer health system [M]. Washington, DC : National Academies Press, 1999 : 1-4.
  • 9Wang X, Liu K, You LM, et al. The relationship between patient safety culture and adverse events: a questionnaire survey[J]. Int Stud,2014,51 (8) : 1114-1122.
  • 10夏成凤,周山.我国患者安全文化测评的循证分析[J].医学研究生学报,2015,28(5):526-529. 被引量:10

二级参考文献90

共引文献356

同被引文献59

引证文献6

二级引证文献24

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部