期刊文献+

基于DNA条形码技术常见肉类掺假鉴别技术的研究 被引量:20

Techniques for Identifying Common Meat Adulterations Based on DNA Barcoding
原文传递
导出
摘要 根据市场上常见的肉类掺假情况,本研究通过提取生鲜牛肉、羊肉、猪肉和鸭肉基因组DNA,按一定比例进行预混合,构建牛肉掺猪肉、羊肉掺猪肉、牛肉掺鸭肉和羊肉掺鸭肉4种掺假模型。通过引物COI-1和COI-2进行PCR扩增和测序比对,建立基于COI基因的动物源性食品的掺假判别方法。根据实验所得纯肉DNA提取率T实现DNA水平到肉水平掺假比例的换算。在肉的掺假水平上,引物COI-2检测效果较好,对牛-猪、羊-猪、牛-鸭和羊-鸭模型掺假物的检出限分别为5%、8%、1%和4%。对采集的28个批次的肉制品进行检测,结果表明:28个样品中89%的样品与产品标签标识的成分相符。建立的基于DNA条形码技术的检测方法可作为一种简单、快速、有效的分子鉴定技术,可以直接应用于研究物源性食品的种类和掺假鉴定。 According to the cases of common meat adulteration seen in the market,four kinds of adulteration models were built:mixed beef-pork,mutton-pork,beef-duck,and mutton-duck by extracting genomic DNAs from fresh beef,mutton,pork,and duck and premixing them at certain ratios.Through polymerase chain reaction(PCR) and sequence comparison using the universal primers COI-1 and COI-2,a COI gene–based method was established to detect adulteration in foods of animal origin.According to the pure meat DNA extraction rate T obtained from the experiment,the conversion of the adulteration ratio from the DNA level into the meat weight level was achieved.At the meat weight level,COI-2 primers provided a relatively accurate detection,and the detection limits of beef-pork,mutton-pork,beef-duck,and mutton-duck adulteration models were 5%,8%,1%,and 4%,respectively.The method was tested on 28 batches of collected meat product samples,and the ingredients of 89% of the identified samples were consistent with those described on the product labels.As a simple,rapid,and effective molecular identification approach,DNA barcoding can be directly applied to determine the animal species present in foods of animal origin and to detect adulteration.
出处 《现代食品科技》 EI CAS 北大核心 2016年第8期295-301,共7页 Modern Food Science and Technology
基金 河北省食药局科技项目(PT2014003)
关键词 DNA条形码 模型 掺假 DNA barcoding meat model adulteration
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献24

  • 1袁芳,郭培源,吴浩,孙梅.猪肉新鲜度检测方法发展的文献综述[J].中国农业科技导报,2009,11(S1):72-74. 被引量:14
  • 2肖金花,肖晖,黄大卫.生物分类学的新动向——DNA条形编码[J].动物学报,2004,50(5):852-855. 被引量:183
  • 3HEBERT P, CYWlNSKA A, BALL S L, et al. Biological identifications through DNA barcodes[J]. Proc R Soc Lond B, 2003, 270(7) : 313-321.
  • 4HEBERT P D N, RATNASINGHAM S, de WAARD J R. Barcoding animal life: cytochrome oxidase subunit I divergences among closely related species[J]. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 2003, 270(Suppll): 96-99.
  • 5BALL S L, HEBERT P D N. Biological identification of mayflies (Ephemeroptera) using DNA barcodes[J]. J N Am Benthol Soc, 2005, 24(3): 508-524.
  • 6WONG E H K, HANNER R H. DNA barcoding detects market substitution in North American seafood[J]. Food Research International, 2008, 41(8): 828-837.
  • 7FOLMER O, BLACK M, HOEH W, et al. DNA Primers for amplification of mitochondrial cytochrome C oxidase subunit I from diverse metazoan invertebrates[J]. Mol Mar Biol Biotechnol, 1994, 3(5): 294-299.
  • 8GenbankDNA序列比对官方网站[EB/OL].[2013-03-26]http://www.blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov.
  • 9DNA条形码官方网站[EB/OL](BOLDSystemv3)[2013.03-26].http://www.boldsystems.org.
  • 10WARD R D, ZEMLAK T S, INNES B H, et al. DNA Barcoding Australia's fish species[J]. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 2005, 360(1462): 1847-1857.

共引文献36

同被引文献212

引证文献20

二级引证文献57

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部