中美ICT企业知识来源的二元性对创新绩效的影响研究被引量：4

The Effect of Ambidexterity in Knowledge Sourcing on Innovation Performance:The Empirical Study of ICT Companies in China and the US

下载PDF

导出

摘要基于探索和利用的二元性视角,以ICT产业为例,研究以美国为代表的发达国家企业与以中国为代表的后发国家企业,在利用科学和技术的二元知识战略选择上不同,以及这种差异对创新绩效的影响。利用专利引文数据进行实证检验,研究显示,美国ICT企业技术知识对创新绩效有显著正向影响;中国ICT企业探索和利用的二元知识来源对创新绩效均有显著正向影响。此外,进一步研究了企业自身的吸收能力在二元性对创新绩效影响中的调节作用,结果显示美国ICT企业自身较强的对知识转化能力,促进吸收能力在技术知识对创新绩效中起正向调节作用;中国ICT企业吸收能力中的对知识的获取能力强,它在科学知识对创新绩效中起正向调节作用。 Based on the perspective of ambidexterity of exploration and exploitation,we take ICT industry as an example to analyze different strategies for using science and technical knowledge by the firms in the US and China,and then analyze the effect of such differences on innovation performance.Using patent citation database,the findings showed that the US ICT enterprises＇ technological knowledge has significant positive effect on innovation performance,while both the exploration and exploitation of Ambidexterity in Knowledge Sourcing from Chinese ICT enterprises have significant positive effect on innovation performance.We further test the moderating effect of absorptive abilities.The US firms＇ absorptive abilities significantly positively moderate the effect of technical knowledge on innovation performance.While Chinese firms＇ absorptive abilities moderate the effect of science knowledge on innovation performance.

作者徐晶钰柳卸林邱姝敏

机构地区中国科学院大学经济与管理学院清华大学经济管理学院

出处《管理学报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第9期1357-1366,共10页 Chinese Journal of Management

基金国家自然科学基金资助项目(70932001)

关键词知识来源二元性吸收能力 knowledge sourcing ambidexterity absorptive ability

分类号 C93 [经济管理—管理学]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献29

1DUNCAN R B. The Ambidextrous Organization: Designing Dual Structures for Innovation[M]. New York: North-Holland, 1976:167-188.
2MARCH J G. Exploration and Exploitation in Organ izational Learning [J]. Organization Science, 1991, 2(1): 71-87.
3LEVINTHAL D A, MARCH J G. The Myopia of Learning[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1993, 14(S2): 95-112.
4TUSHMAN M L, O'REILLY C A. The Ambidex- trous Organizations.. Managing Evolutionary and Revolutionary Change [J]. California Management Review, 1996, 38(4): 8-30.
5HE Z L, WONG P K. Exploration vs. Exploitation: An Empirical Test of the Ambidexterity Hypothesis [J]. Organization Science, 2004, 15(4): 481-494.
6GIBSON C B, BIRKINSHAW J. The Antecedents, Consequences, and Mediating Role of Organizational Ambidexterity[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2004, 47(2): 209-226.
7MILLER D. The Generic Strategy Trap[J]. Journal of Business Strategy, 1992, 13(1): 37-41.
8ATUAHENE-GIMA K. Resolving the Capability.. Rigidity Paradox in New Product Innovation [J]. Journal of Marketing, 2005, 69(4): 61-83.
9SEGARRA-CIPRES M, CARLOS BOU-LLUSAR J, ROCA-PUIG V. Exploring and Exploiting External Knowledge.. The Effect of Sector and Firm Techno- logical Intensity[J]. Innovation, 2012, 14(2): 203- 217.
10COHEN W M, LEVINTHAL D A. Absorptive Ca- pacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innova- tion[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1990, 35(1): 128-152.