摘要
李振钧早年诗歌记录了他的生平行事,后期供职于翰林院期间,其深受性灵诗风影响的诗作被乡试座主黄爵滋斥为"狎亵"之作,但他似乎并未从此改弦易辙,主动融入以黄爵滋为核心的宣南文人群体,而是始终疏离于他们的诗歌活动。李振钧的"艳诗"在后世受到一定关注,从侧面印证了他既没有参与道光年间雅正诗风的重建,也没有参与经世诗风的变革。
Li Zhenjun's earlier poetry recorded his life story. Later, when he worked for Hanlin Academy, his poetry was regarded as obscene by Hnang Juezi because of its being influenced by the Xingling poetry. But he didn't change his style of creation or integrated him into Xuannan Group, kept him away from their poetry activity constantly instead. Li's poetry received certain attention in later times, which showed indirectly that he didn't participate in reestablishing the writing style advocating elegance during Daoguang or reforming the writing style advocating life experience.
出处
《淮南师范学院学报》
2016年第4期1-7,共7页
Journal of Huainan Normal University
关键词
李振钧
黄爵滋
性灵
佚诗
Li Zhenjun
Huangjuezi
Xingling
lost poetry