期刊文献+

传统企业广告投入与企业绩效的非线性关系研究——基于工业企业数据的门槛分析 被引量:9

Nonlinear Relationship Between Traditional Advertising Investment and Enterprise Performance——Threshold Analysis Based on Industrial Enterprises Data
下载PDF
导出
摘要 广告支出的决策,是现代企业营销活动中十分重要的一个环节。在资源总量一定的情况下,如果广告费用投入过多,势必会影响企业在其他方面的支出,此时过量的广告投入反而不利于企业经营绩效的改善。采用门槛回归的方法,验证广告费用投入强度与企业绩效之间并不是简单的线性关系,传统企业广告投入对经营绩效的影响呈现出明显的阶段性特征,并且广告投入强度的最佳区间范围是[0,0.0463],在此范围内广告投入的效用达到最大。高技术产业制造业由于企业特性决定其广告投入强度的最佳区间范围是[0,0.0275],小于普通制造业。 Making advertising investment decisions is an important step of modem enterprise marketing acnvlties. In the case of a certain amount of resource, if advertising costs too much, it will definitely affect spending in other areas. In that situation, excessive advertising will be detrimental to the business performance improvement. Therefore, this paper adopts threshold regression and verifies that there is not a simple linear relationship between advertisement investment intensity and firm performance. The impact of traditional advertisement investment on enterprises operating performance shows a clear stage characteristic. What' s more, the best range of advertising investment is [ 0, 0. 0463 ] . In other words, advertising investment maximizes its effectiveness in this range. The best rang of high technology industry manufacturing is [ 0, 0. 0275 ], less than ordinary manufacturing, which is determined by its enterprise features.
出处 《北京邮电大学学报(社会科学版)》 EI CAS CSSCI 2016年第4期92-100,共9页 Journal of Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications(Social Sciences Edition)
关键词 广告投入 企业绩效 门槛回归 advertising investment business performance threshold regression
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

  • 1Bain J S. Barriers to new competition : their character and consequences in manufacturing industries [ M ]. Cambridge : HarvardE2~ E3! E4i University Press, 1956.
  • 2Lambin J J. Advertising, competition and market conduct in oligopoly over time[ M]. Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1976.
  • 3Dub6 Jean-Pierre, Gtinter J Hitsch, Manchanda P. An empirical model of advertising dynamics [J]Quantitative Marketing & Economics, 2005, 3(2): 107-144.
  • 4Erickson G, Jacobson R. Gaining comparative advantage through discretionary expenditures: the returns to R&D and advertis- ing[ J 1- Management Science, 1992, 38 (9) : 1264-1279.
  • 5Pitelis C N. The effects of advertising and investment on aggregate profits [J]. Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 1991,38 ( 1 ) : 32-40.
  • 6Chauvin K W, Hirschey M. Advertising, R&D expenditures and the market value of the firm [J]. Financial Management, 1993, 22(4): 128-140.
  • 7Ishigaki H. Informative advertising and entry deterrence: a bertrand model[J]. Economics Letters, 2000, 67(3): 337-343.
  • 8Srinivasan R, Lilien G L. R&D, advertising and firm performance in recessions[R/OL]. ISBM Report, 2009. http://www. doc88, com/p-9959968161841, html.
  • 9孙维峰,黄祖辉.广告支出、研发支出与企业绩效[J].科研管理,2013,34(2):44-51. 被引量:101
  • 10孙楚仁,张楠,陈勇兵.出口会影响企业在城市内部的区位选择吗?——基于2004年“中国工业企业数据库”上海市数据的分析[J].世界经济研究,2015(12):66-77. 被引量:4

二级参考文献100

  • 1刘楠,杜跃平.政府补贴方式选择对企业研发创新的激励效应研究[J].科技进步与对策,2005,22(11):18-19. 被引量:53
  • 2梁莱歆,严绍东.中国上市公司R&D支出及其经济效果的实证研究[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2006,27(7):34-38. 被引量:69
  • 3Fisher M, Temin P. Returns to Scale in Research and Development: What Does the Schumpeterian Hypothesis Imply? [J]. Journal of Politieal Economy, 1973(1).
  • 4Cohen M, Klepper S. Firm Size and the Nature of Innovation within Industries: the Case of Process and Product RO.D [J]. Review of Economics and Statistics,1996(78).
  • 5Gfiliches Z Returns to Research and Development Expenditure in the Private Sector[M]ff. In: Kendrick J W, Vaccara B N. New Developments in Productivity Measurement and Analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1980.
  • 6Cohen W M. Empirical Studies of Innovative Activity[M]ff. In.. Stoneman P. Handbook of the Economics of Innovation and Technological Change. Boston: Blackwell Press, 1995.
  • 7Mintzberg H. Structure in Fives: Designing Effective Organizations [M]. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall, 1993.
  • 8Tsai K, Wang J. Does R&D Performance Decline with Firm Size? Are--examination in Terms of Elasticity[J]. Research Policy, 2005(6).
  • 9Dietmar H. RD Spillovers, Technological Proximity and Productivity Growth: Evidence from German Panel Data[J]. Schrnalenbach Business Review, 2000(3).
  • 10Wakelin K. Productivity growth and R&D expenditure in UK manufacturing firms [ J]. Research Policy, 2001, 30(7) : 1079 - 1090.

共引文献281

同被引文献58

引证文献9

二级引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部