期刊文献+

喉罩吸入全麻用于小儿腹腔镜疝修补术的临床应用疗效分析 被引量:1

下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的研究将喉罩吸入全麻作为小儿腹腔镜疝修补手术麻醉方式的效果和安全性.方法将 2014 年 5 月-2015 年 11 月于我院进行小儿腹腔镜疝修补术患儿75例,根据麻醉方式分为对照组(气管插管全麻)32例和观察组(喉罩吸入全麻)43例,对比两组的手术效果和手术过程中生命体征变化.结果观察组并发症发生率和术后镇痛药物使用率分别为6.98%、23.26%,均显著低于对照组(X2=5.49,6.12;P〈0.05);且观察组术中MBP、HR与术后苏醒时间依次为(68.57±6.94)mmHg、(114.95±17.42)次/min、(14.65±3.21)min,均显著短于对照组(t=12.85,10.57,13.56;P〈0.05).结论小儿腹腔镜疝修补术中采用喉罩吸入全麻方式,不会对患儿的呼吸功能产生不利影响,且并发症风险较低,具备于临床外科推广应用的意义和价值. ObjectiveTo study the laryngeal mask inhalation anesthesia for pediatric laparoscopic hernia repair surgery anesthesia effect and safety.Methods in May 2014 - November 2015 in our hospital in 75 cases of children with infantile laparoscopic hernia repair, according to the way of anesthesia were divided into control group (32 endotracheal intubation anesthesia) and observation group (laryngeal mask inhalation anesthesia) 43 cases, compared two groups of vital signs change during the process of operation effect and operation.Results to observe the incidence of complications and postoperative analgesia drug utilization rate were 6.98%, 23.26%, respectively, were significantly lower than the control group (X squared = 5.49, 5.49; P 〈 0.05);Intraoperative MBP and observation group, HR and postoperative waking time was (68.57 + 6.94) mmHg, (114.95-17.42) times/min, (14.65-3.21) min, were significantly shorter than the control group (t = 12.85, 10.57, 12.85; P 〈 0.05).Conclusionchildren with laryngeal mask inhalation anesthesia in laparoscopic hernia repair, not harmful to the patient's respiratory function, and a lower risk of complications, have the meaning and value of application in clinical surgery.
出处 《湖南中医药大学学报》 CAS 2016年第A01期425-426,共2页 Journal of Hunan University of Chinese Medicine
关键词 喉罩吸入全麻 小儿腹腔镜疝修补术 临床应用效果 The laryngeal mask inhalation anesthesia Pediatric laparoscopic hernia repair The clinical application effect of
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献33

  • 1李宇洲.我国腹腔镜治疗小儿斜疝的现状和发展前景[J].中国微创外科杂志,2004,4(5):368-369. 被引量:183
  • 2李子刚,陈虹.七氟醚吸入麻醉诱导与异丙酚静脉麻醉诱导的临床比较[J].浙江预防医学,2005,17(11):75-76. 被引量:57
  • 3HURFORD W E,BAILIN M T,DAVISON J K.Clinical anesthesia procedures of the nassachusetts General Hospital[M].Philadephia:Lipp incott willams&,2002:165-166.
  • 4LEACH A B,ALEXANDER C A.The laryngeal mask,an overview[J].Eur J Aneasthsiol,1991,4:19-31.
  • 5HIGGINS P P,CHUNG F,MEZEI G.Postoperative sore throat after ambulatory surgery[J].Br J Anaesth,2002,88(4):582-584.
  • 6JOSHI G P,INAGAKI Y,WHITE P F,et al.Use of the laryngeal mask airway as an alternative to the tracheal tube during ambulatory anesthesia[J].Anesth Analg,1997,85(3):574-576.
  • 7薛富善.现代呼吸道管理学:麻醉与危重症治疗关键技术[M].郑州:郑州大学出版社,2001.585.
  • 8Manyam SC, Gupta DK, Johnson KB, et al. Opioid-volatile anes- thetic synergy: a response surface model with remifentanil and sevoflurane as prototypes [ J ]. Anesthesiology, 2006,105 ( 2 ) :267- 278.
  • 9Albertin A, Casati A, Bergonzi P, et al. Effects of two target2 con- trolled concentration ( 1 and 3 ng/ml ) of remifentanil on MAC (BAR) of sevoflurane [ J ]. Anesthesiology, 2004, 100 ( 2 ) : 255-259.
  • 10Fombeur PO, Tilleu1 PR, Beaussier M J, et al. Cost-effectiveness of propofol anesthesia using TCI with a standard regimen using des- flurane [ J ]. Am J Health Syst Pharm, 2002,59 ( 14 ) : 1344-1350.

共引文献40

同被引文献9

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部