不同部位放血疗法治疗急性腰扭伤对比研究

目的研究不同部位放血在治疗急性腰扭伤中的疗效差异.方法 90 例急性腰扭伤患者随机分成压痛点放血组、委中穴放血组 和综合组（压痛点及委中穴均放血组）进行治疗,对比观察疗效.结果压痛点穴及委中穴放血两组之间总有效率差异无统计学意义（P〉0.05）,综合放血组疗效优于压痛点放血组及委中放血组 （P 〈 0.01）.结论放血疗法是治疗急性腰扭伤的有效方法,综合放血疗法优于单纯压痛点放血或委中穴放血.

ObjectiveTo study the effect of differences in different parts of bleeding in the treatment of acute lumbar sprain. Method90 patients with acute lumbar sprain were randomly divided into tenderness point bloodletting group, Weizhong acupoint bloodletting group and comprehensive group （tenderness and appointed points were bleeding group） were treated. The efficacy was compared. Resultstenderness acupoint and appointed acupoint bloodletting between the two groups total efficiency differences had no statistical significance （P 〉 0.05） and comprehensive bloodletting group curative effect is better than tenderness point bloodletting group and appointed bleeding group （P 〈 0.01）. Conclusionbloodletting therapy is an effective method for the treatment of acute lumbar sprain, comprehensive bloodletting therapyBetter than tenderness Point Weizhong blood or blood.