期刊文献+

概念隐喻与概念整合互补性研究——以反腐热词“打虎拍蝇”为例 被引量:2

The Complementary Studies on Conceptual Metaphor Theory and Blending Theory——Catchword“Da Hu Pai Ying”as an Example
下载PDF
导出
摘要 概念隐喻理论和概念整合理论都将自身视为一种普遍存在的认知方式,是人们认知、思维、语言的基础。目前认知语言学界对两种理论间的关系存在着对立观和阐释观,系统对比分析两种理论在长期记忆与在线处理、单线性与多维性、重要关系与关系压缩、规约与创新四个方面存在互补。"打虎拍蝇"的意义建构与创新经历了隐喻与概念整合两个阶段,是二者互动性的成果,是两种理论互动性关系的有利证明。 Abstract. Conceptual Metaphor Theory and Blending Theory are both regarded as a common cognitive way and the basis of thinking and language. Through comparison between these theories it is found that they are complementary in terms of long-term memory and on-the-spot processing, unidimension and multi-dimension, relation and relation compression, convention and creation which refutes the opposing and explanatory ideas about these two theories. The meaning construction and creation of catchword "Da Hu Pal Ying" has been through two phase in the light of Conceptual Metaphor Theory and Blending Theo- ry, which can prove the above conclusion.
作者 田薇
出处 《中北大学学报(社会科学版)》 2016年第4期105-109,共5页 Journal of North University of China:Social Science Edition
关键词 概念隐喻 概念整合 互补 “打虎拍蝇” conceptual metaphor theory blending theory complementary "Da Hu Pai Ying"
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1文旭.国外认知语言学研究综观[J].外国语,1999,22(1):35-41. 被引量:191
  • 2Fauconnier, Gile Mark Turner. Conceptual integra- tion networks [J]. Cognitive Science, 1998 (2).. 133- 201.
  • 3Fauconnier, Gile. Mental Spaces: Aspects of Meaning Construction in Natural Language[M]. Cambridge Uni- versity Press, 1994.
  • 4Fauconnier, Gile Mark Turner. The Way We Think: Conceptual Blending and the Minds Hidden Complexi- tiesEM], New York: Basic Books, 2002.
  • 5Ungerer, F. Sehmid, H. J. An Introduction to Cog- nitive Linuistics[M]. London: Lonman, 1996.
  • 6孙毅,陈朗.概念整合理论对概念隐喻观的补偿性阐释功能[J].宁夏大学学报(人文社会科学版),2009,31(3):171-175. 被引量:16
  • 7Lakoff, G. g M. Johnson. Metaphors We Live By [M]. Chicago.. The University of Chicago Press, 1980.

二级参考文献13

  • 1王红孝.空间映射论与概念整合的认知过程[J].外语学刊,2004(6):66-72. 被引量:40
  • 2苏晓军,张爱玲.概念整合理论的认知力[J].外国语,2001,24(3):31-36. 被引量:150
  • 3刘敦萍.概念整合对幽默言语的阐释力[J].四川外语学院学报,2006,22(4):80-83. 被引量:31
  • 4FAUCONNIER G.Mappings in Thought and Language[M].Cambridge:CUP,1997:149-186.
  • 5FAUCONNlER G,TURNER M.Principles of Conceptual Integration[M]//JEAN PIERRE KOENING.Discourse and Cognition.Stanford:CSLI Publications,1998:269-283.
  • 6FAUCONNIER G,Turner M.The Way We Think[M].Basic Books:New York,2002:279-295.
  • 7COULSON S.The Menendez Brothers Vires:Analogical Mapping in Blended Spaces[M]//Adele Goldberg.Con-ceptual Structure,Discourse,and Language.Stanford,CA:CSLI,2000:67-81.
  • 8GRADY J.Cognitive Mechanisms of Conceptual Integration[J].Cognitive Linguistics,2000(11-3/4):335-345.
  • 9FAUCONNIER G.Mental Spaces:aspects of meaning con-struction in natural language[M].Cambridge University Press,1994:16-34.
  • 10LAKOFF G,JOHNSON M.Metaphors We Live By[M].Chicago:University of Chicago Press,1980:3.

共引文献204

同被引文献13

引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部