期刊文献+

轻型颅脑创伤患者病情加重的回顾性研究

Retrospective study on neurological deterioration after mild traumatic brain injury
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:探讨轻型颅脑创伤患者病情加重的原因、时间过程、预测因素和治疗结果。方法搜集254例符合条件的轻型颅脑创伤患者的临床资料,采用单因素分析及Logistic回归分析的方法,分析病情加重的预测因素,比较病情加重患者与无病情加重患者的近期疗效。结果254例患者中36例病情加重,发生率为14.2%;33例(91.7%,33/36)病情加重的原因为颅内原因,其中最多见的是颅内血肿增大(44.4%,16/36)。36例病情加重患者从入院至病情加重的时间是(0.5~59.0)h。30例(83.3%,30/36)发生在入院24 h内。单因素分析结果表明,危险受伤机制、伤后有意识丧失、伤后出现剧烈头痛、伤后出现1次以上呕吐、受伤至首次CT检查的时间、入院时格拉斯哥昏迷量表(GCS)评分、颅底骨折、入院时血凝检查结果异常、饮酒嗜好是轻型颅脑创伤患者病情加重的预测因素(P<0.05或<0.01)。Logistic回归分析结果表明,受伤至首次CT检查的时间(P=0.000,OR=0.169,95%可信区间:0.083~0.344)、入院时GCS评分(P=0.004,OR=0.355,95%可信区间:0.175~0.721)、入院时血凝检查结果异常(P=0.001,OR=0.077,95%可信区间:0.017~0.354)为轻型颅脑创伤患者病情加重的独立预测因素。无病情加重组出院时的治疗结果均为良好,病情加重组出院时良好30例,轻残4例,重残1例,死亡1例,两组治疗结果比较差异有统计学意义(Z=-6.088,P=0.000)。结论轻型颅脑创伤患者病情加重的原因大多为颅内原因,且多发生在入院后24 h内。病情加重的独立预测因素有受伤至首次CT检查的时间、入院时GCS评分和入院时血凝检查结果异常。病情加重会对轻型颅脑创伤患者的近期疗效造成不利影响。 Objective To study the causes, temporal courses, predictors and outcomes of delayed neurological deterioration (DND) after mild traumatic brain injury. Methods In a cohort of 254 patients, the incidence, causes and temporal courses of DND after mild traumatic brain injury were summed up. Univariate and multivariate (Logistic regression) analysis were performed to assess the predictors of DND. The short-term outcomes were compared between patients with and without DND. Results DND occurred in 14.2% (36/254) of the 254 patients. Intracranial causes of DND such as hematoma growth were observed in 91.7%(33/36) of patients with DND. The interval from arrival to DND was 0.5- 59.0 h. Thirty patients (83.3%, 30/36) deteriorated within 24 h. The univariate analysis revealed that dangerous injury mechanism, loss of consciousness, severe headache, more than 1 time vomiting, interval from injury to first CT scanning, first Glasgow coma scale (GCS) scores, basal skull fracture, hypocoagulability, heavy alcohol consumption were the predict factors for DND (P〈0.05 or〈0.01). The multivariate analysis revealed that interval from injury to first CT scanning (P=0.000, OR=0.169, 95% CI: 0.083- 0.344), first GCS scores (P = 0.004, OR = 0.355, 95%CI: 0.175- 0.721) and hypocoagulability (P=0.001, OR=0.077, 95%CI:0.017-0.354) were the independent predict factors for DND. All of the patients without DND recovered better. But in the patients with DND, 30 patients recovered better, 4 patients had slight disability, 1 patient had severe disability, and 1 patient died. The treatment outcome between two groups had significant difference (Z =-6.088, P = 0.000). Conclusions The causes of DND are mostly intracranial. Most patients deteriorat within 24 h. The interval from injury to first CT scanning, first GCS scores and hypocoagulability appear to be independent predictors of DND. DND is associated with poor short-term outcomes.
出处 《中国医师进修杂志》 2016年第9期822-825,共4页 Chinese Journal of Postgraduates of Medicine
关键词 轻型颅脑创伤 疾病恶化 因素分析 统计学 治疗结果 Mild traumatic brain injury Disease progression Factor analysis,statistical Treatment outcome
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1Choudhry O J, Prestigiacomo CJ, Ga!a N, et al. Delayed neurological deterioration after mild head injury: cause, temporal course, and outcomes[J]. Neurosurg , 2013, 73(5):753-760.
  • 2Clement CM, Stiell IG, Schull M J, et al. Clinical features of head injury patients presenting with a Glasgow coma scale score of 15 and who require neurosurgical intervention[J]. Ann Emerg Med, 2006, 48(3): 245-251.
  • 3Davis DP, Kene M, Vilke GM, et al. Head-injured patients who "talk and die": the San Diego perspective[J]. J Trauma, 2007, 62 (2): 277-281.
  • 4Sifrl ZC, Homnick AT, Vaynman A, et al. A prospective evaluation of the value of repeat cranial computed tomography in patients with minimal head injury and an intracranial bleed[J]. J Trauma, 2006,61(4):862-867.
  • 5江基尧,朱诚,罗其中.颅脑创伤临床救治指南[M].3版.上海:第二军医大学出版社,2007:1.241.
  • 6Carlson AP, Ramirez P, Kennedy G, et al. Low rate of delayed deterioration requiring surgical treatment in patients transferred to a tertiary care center for mild traumatic brain injury[J]. Neurosurg Focus, 2010, 29(5):E3.
  • 7Velmahos GC, Gervasini A, Petrovick L, et al. Routine repeat head CT for minimal head injury is unnecessary[J]. J Trauma, 2006, 60(3):494-499.
  • 8马坤,许建强.创伤性颅内静脉窦闭塞治疗的初步经验[J].中国医师进修杂志,2013,36(8):51-53. 被引量:2
  • 9Fujii Y, Takeuchi S, Sasaki O, et al. Multivariate analysis of predictors of hematoma enlargement in spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage[J].Stroke, 1998, 29(6): 1160-1166.

二级参考文献7

  • 1Filippidis A,Kapsalaki E, Patramani G, et al. Cerebral venous sinusthrombosis : review of the demographics, pathophysiology, currentdiagnosis y and treatment. Neurosurg Focus, 2009,27(5) : E3.
  • 2Zhao X,Rizzo A,Malek B,et al. Basilar skull fracture:a risk factorfor transverse/sigmoid venous sinus obstruction. J Neurotrauma,2008,25(2):104-111.
  • 3Yuen HW,Gan BK.Seow WT,et al. Dural sinus thrombosis afterminor head injury in a child. Ann Acad Med Singapore, 2005,34(10):639-641.
  • 4Quinones-Hinojosa A,Binder DK, Hemphill JC 3rd,et al. Diagnosisof posttraumatic transverse sinus thrombosis with magneticresonance imaging/magnetic resonance venography : report of twocases. J Trauma, 2004,56( 1) :201-204.
  • 5江基亮,朱诚.颅脑创伤临床救治指南.上海:第二军医大学出版社,2002:9-170.
  • 6Bentley JN,Figueroa RE,Vender JR. From presentation to follow-up :diagnosis and treatment of cerebral venous thrombosis.Neurosurg Focus,2009,27( 5 ) : E4.
  • 7Medel R,Monteith SJ,Crowley RW,et al. A review of therapeuticstrategies for the management of cerebral venous sinus thrombosis.Neurosurg Focus,2009,27(5):E6.

共引文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部