摘要
文章通过考察美韩自由贸易协定、美新自由贸易协定以及跨太平洋伙伴关系协定,总结国际规则下金融业负面清单设计的主要特点和经验,比较当前国内自贸试验区金融服务业负面清单与国际协定的主要差距,尝试分析国内负面清单保守编制做法的主要原因。文章提出,自贸试验区三周年后,为有效对接高标准国际投资贸易规则,自贸区需要编制一份更全面反映金融开放现状、更符合国际规则的金融业负面清单。
This Paper summarizes the characteristics and international practices of Financial Services Non-Conforming Measures( Annex III) in US-Korea FTA,Singapore-US FTA and TPP. It makes comparison of the financial service negative lists between international trade agreements and China's Pilot Free Trade Zone,and further analyses why Pilot Free Trade Zone adopts conservative method to develop the negative list. After three years' trial of Pilot Free Trade Zone,this Paper suggests making a more comprehensive and transparent financial service negative list,which includes more detailed description of existing non-conforming measures of financial services in China.
出处
《世界经济研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2016年第9期110-117,134,共9页
World Economy Studies
基金
2015年上海市决策咨询重点课题"中美BIT谈判金融及相关服务业领域在上海自贸试验区选择性先试先行研究(项目编号:2015-A-34-B)"部分内容基础上修改而成